The Case of JonBenèt Ramsey

[atomicmama]

Reading this article, the DNA on the underwear is a spot of blood:

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment...msey-case.html

I literally just read it was blood.
Does anyone recall if they said that during the show? Because that makes the new underwear test ridiculous.

[Wise Enough]

I can see that those in this thread who are criticising the program didn't actually watch it.

.

No I watched it and I'm still doubtful. I'm not saying he didn't do it, but nor am I saying he did. There's a lot of convincing arguments for (the letter, his reaction to the pineapple picture). But as I've said previously I found their DNA argument weak. They would have had to have been brand new (not washed). And they said it was on two items of clothing from transferring from the first. I find that very hard to believe.

Honestly I think if it had gone to trial there wouldn't have been enough evidence to convict beyond a reasonable doubt. The show should have presented the evidence and let viewers decide. But they said at the end we think Burke did it. So I would sue too if I were them.