+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 30
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    466
    Thanks
    185
    Thanked
    151
    Reviews
    0
    Oh and I still need a full morph at around 20 weeks though too

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    1,986
    Thanks
    1,613
    Thanked
    1,715
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by tootsiegirl View Post
    I'm the same as @witherwings... My ob recommended NIPT and a scan, I assume like a morph scsn checking for physical abnormalities at 13 weeks. Apparently that's the standard procedure at the women's specialist scan clinic I'm having to go through.
    The 13 week scan is called a Nuchal scan, looks at different things to the morphology scan. As you said you need both the 12 week and 20 week scans.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    466
    Thanks
    185
    Thanked
    151
    Reviews
    0
    Cool Im happy to know all of those things will be looked at. Maybe he my ob does not referr to it as a nuchal scan as he explained my options were one or the other (nuchal or nipt) and to save confusion in having people think they are paying for both unnecessarily (as obviously bloods aren't taken to accompany the 13 week scan if you have paid for nipt).

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,297
    Thanks
    1,410
    Thanked
    1,322
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mummymaybe View Post
    @witherwings NT shows things that harmony wouldn't and you can't have a morph scan before 18 weeks.

    This option might cause an issue to be missed at 12 weeks that could be fix or monitored and actually risk the bubs or mums health. Sadly unsurvivable or life limiting abnormalities are found on NT scans and termination is much more straight forward at 12 weeks than 20.
    @Shoopuf, I'm sure your NT scan will show a happy healthy baby, just don't want you to be misinformed.
    My ob referred me for an "early morph" scan in my first trimester which looked at nuchal translucency as well as nasal bone. I've had 2 NT scans in my previous pregnancies and I can tell you there really wasn't much difference, if any between an early morph(or anatomy) scan and an NT scan. As for the blood test, the harmony test is more accurate in determining chromosomal abnormalities.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,297
    Thanks
    1,410
    Thanked
    1,322
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by tootsiegirl View Post
    I'm the same as @witherwings... My ob recommended NIPT and a scan, I assume like a morph scsn checking for physical abnormalities at 13 weeks. Apparently that's the standard procedure at the women's specialist scan clinic I'm having to go through.
    Yes this. Exactly. My ob wouldn't have recommended something that would put my baby or myself at risk.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    6,014
    Thanks
    4,001
    Thanked
    1,699
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by witherwings View Post
    If you have the harmony test you might not need to do an NT blood test. I only did the harmony test and then an early morph scan. So the harmony test was around 11 weeks and then the morph scan was around 12-13 weeks from memory
    I was told you should still have the bloods, because it can indicate possible future issues with the placenta

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Lil Smurfy For This Useful Post:

    Mum-I-Am  (15-09-2016)

  8. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1,726
    Thanks
    459
    Thanked
    911
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    You can have an ultrasound at ~12 weeks that looks at morphology without having the NT done. I didn't have the NT with DS but had a full scan to look at everything else at 12 weeks. They just didn't take the measurements of the neck fold.

    NT is done between 11-13 weeks so you will still be able to get it done in time @Shoopuf.

  9. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,297
    Thanks
    1,410
    Thanked
    1,322
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by tootsiegirl View Post
    Cool Im happy to know all of those things will be looked at. Maybe he my ob does not referr to it as a nuchal scan as he explained my options were one or the other (nuchal or nipt) and to save confusion in having people think they are paying for both unnecessarily (as obviously bloods aren't taken to accompany the 13 week scan if you have paid for nipt).
    The way my ob explained it was, the NIPT (blood test combined with early anatomy scan) is more "accurate" than an NT screening (although not diagnostic like a CVS or amnio) and if you have both, they can end up with different results, leaving the mother confused and unsure which one to trust. Since the NIPT is more "accurate" than NT screening, if you're planning to do NIPT (harmony) then there is no need to do the NT screening as well.

  10. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,109
    Thanks
    897
    Thanked
    1,069
    Reviews
    2
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    I had my bloods done at 11 wks, my NT scan at 12 wks where given results immediately by head of radiology in turn we didn't need the harmony scan. I am 100% private all the way. I was only out of pocket $2500 for OB, scans, paed for baby, anastetic for c-sec.

    I'm very surprised that your gp hadn't hasn't given you referrals for anything.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to babybeeno1 For This Useful Post:

    Mum-I-Am  (15-09-2016)

  12. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,327
    Thanks
    2,217
    Thanked
    3,215
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by babybeeno1 View Post
    I had my bloods done at 11 wks, my NT scan at 12 wks where given results immediately by head of radiology in turn we didn't need the harmony scan. I am 100% private all the way. I was only out of pocket $2500 for OB, scans, paed for baby, anastetic for c-sec.

    I'm very surprised that your gp hadn't hasn't given you referrals for anything.
    My GP hasn't seen me since 7.5 weeks due to me being overseas for the past 3.5 weeks. I'd imagine 7.5 weeks was maybe a bit early for her to give me any referrals.


 

Similar Threads

  1. Follicles scan via transabdominal scan
    By makino in forum pregnancy and babies through IVF
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 13-08-2016, 07:47
  2. First Scan
    By PinkTutu in forum First Trimester Chat
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-03-2016, 14:04
  3. Nuchal scan
    By fluffykitty in forum First Trimester Chat
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 26-10-2015, 12:07

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
Sarah Tooke Childbirth & Parenting EducationProviding private, personalised antenatal childbirth & parenting education to expectant parents in the comfort of their ...
FORUMS - chatting now ...
Boys will be boys?General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
Come chat, Ladies who are 40+ TTC or ExpectingConception & Fertility General Chat
Change of care planStep-parents / Blended families
Spectacular September TTCConception & Fertility General Chat
HSG or HyCoSy Western SydneyConception issues & ttc
Return to work after parental leaveWorking Hubbers - Employed
REVIEWS
"Made bed time less anxious"
by Meld85
My Little Heart Whisbear - the Humming Bear reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›