+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 82
  1. #51
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Central West
    Posts
    1,596
    Thanks
    1,998
    Thanked
    947
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by delirium View Post
    Literacy performance has gone through the roof since our school implemented L3. I did placement in a JollyPhonics primary and prefer L3
    I love L3 but that's because I'm a trained Reading Recovery teacher. Our reading results have gone through the roof since we implemented L3. We are currently trying to have it for K-2 rather than just K-1. We do Reading to Learn from year 2 onwards and it just isn't explicit enough in its reading instruction for my liking. Great for your average and brighter kids and useless for your strugglers.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Chippa For This Useful Post:

    delirium  (28-08-2016)

  3. #52
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    At the beach
    Posts
    10,486
    Thanks
    1,430
    Thanked
    9,006
    Reviews
    3
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 17/10/14100 Posts in a week

    Default Choosing a school for my son

    Quote Originally Posted by Elijahs Mum View Post
    Not prep as in pre school ( they do no sight words at 4 year old pre school ) but kindergarten ( NSW first year of primary school) DS learnt 250 sight words by June but they do them at the boys pace and they have tons of play time , sport and outside time ( we are an IB school as well ) and they do music and language
    250 sight words for a 5 year old? All power to them but it wouldn't have worked for my son. My girls yes but not my son. He spends far too much time pretending to be a pirate to learn that many words.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Sonja For This Useful Post:

    binnielici  (28-08-2016)

  5. #53
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    10,885
    Thanks
    3,429
    Thanked
    6,811
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sonja View Post
    250 sight words for a 5 year old? All power to them but it wouldn't have worked for my son. My girls yes but not my son. He spends far too much time pretending to be a pirate to learn that many words.
    Some boys are only up to about 100 but it's child led so they go as fast as they want too which I like as DS is a sponge at this age and loves learning , we are lucky we have a full time teachers aid in a class of 19 so they have a lot of support

  6. #54
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    At the beach
    Posts
    10,486
    Thanks
    1,430
    Thanked
    9,006
    Reviews
    3
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 17/10/14100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by Elijahs Mum View Post
    Some boys are only up to about 100 but it's child led so they go as fast as they want too which I like as DS is a sponge at this age and loves learning , we are lucky we have a full time teachers aid in a class of 19 so they have a lot of support
    My son would be lucky to be at 40. To be honest I wouldn't have a clue. We do his reader but I don't do sight words at home.

  7. #55
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    my house
    Posts
    18,327
    Thanks
    1,453
    Thanked
    7,932
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Chippa View Post
    I love L3 but that's because I'm a trained Reading Recovery teacher. Our reading results have gone through the roof since we implemented L3. We are currently trying to have it for K-2 rather than just K-1. We do Reading to Learn from year 2 onwards and it just isn't explicit enough in its reading instruction for my liking. Great for your average and brighter kids and useless for your strugglers.
    We are one of the pilot early action for success schools. Our current year 3 students are the first in our school to have L3 since they started school. This year we had the number of year 3 students at proficiency in reading double. I know not to place too much emphasis on NAPLAN, but that is quite impressive.

    We have L3 for K-2 at my school and at my children's school. I'm in the middle of doing my stage 1 L3 training. I've touched a bit on kindy L3 for guided writing and interactive writing and some red level reading.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to BigRedV For This Useful Post:

    Chippa  (29-08-2016)

  9. #56
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    my house
    Posts
    18,327
    Thanks
    1,453
    Thanked
    7,932
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts

    Default Choosing a school for my son

    Quote Originally Posted by delirium View Post
    Literacy performance has gone through the roof since our school implemented L3. I did placement in a JollyPhonics primary and prefer L3
    Yes, same as at my children's school too

  10. #57
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    my house
    Posts
    18,327
    Thanks
    1,453
    Thanked
    7,932
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by misho View Post
    So why does it differ so much between schools in Sydney?

    Genuine question. I have no experience with this.
    Honestly, I think it depends a lot on the expectations of parents and the school itself. I'd guess that the schools that expect their children to be learning a lot of sight words would be high income and highly educated areas.

    I think it also depends on the school's plan/goals.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to BigRedV For This Useful Post:

    Sonja  (28-08-2016)

  12. #58
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,616
    Thanks
    888
    Thanked
    2,068
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    In SA, I've not worked in a school with such a huge focus on sight words. We've always used more of a phonics-based approach, with some high-frequency words to complement the phonics curriculum.

    And in regards to WA bullying the parents into starting school too young - great that they've lowered the curriculum expectations to account for the fact that the kids are younger. The thing I disagree with is basically FORCING parents to start their kids in full time school at 4.5 years old,and not letting them wait until the child is 5.5, even if the child isn't ready. My 2nd is starting preschool 2 days per week next year. She will be 4.5. She is bright and capable, but socially and emotionally,there is NO WAY she would have been ready to be in school for 5 full days at 4.5y.o, or in preschool for 2 days at age 3.5, no matter how play based the curriculum is. That's where the individual needs of the child (socially,emotionally and cognitively) should be taken into account,rather than forcing kids into school too early, when Australian law only dictates they need to be in school by age 6. This is what I disagree with. As a mother AND as a prep teacher.
    Last edited by cheeeeesecake; 28-08-2016 at 20:30.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to cheeeeesecake For This Useful Post:

    ClaireI  (30-08-2016)

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    on a sandy beach!
    Posts
    6,645
    Thanks
    343
    Thanked
    2,288
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    I'm so confused with words people are using I'm a bit far behind with intelligence 😁 L3 etc!? What on earth is this.

  15. #60
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8,396
    Thanks
    5,947
    Thanked
    4,955
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 17/4/15100 Posts in a week
    Those saying 4.5 years old, just to clarify, are you saying a child who is between 4 and 10/11 months the day they start is still 4.5 or 5?


 
+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. What is important to you when choosing a school?
    By Nafsika in forum General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 31-12-2015, 19:21
  2. What is important to you when choosing a primary school?
    By Nafsika in forum Preschools and Schools
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 29-12-2015, 14:57

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
TreeHutVillageWe offer a secure, quick and easy way to hire and lend baby equipment. It directly connects families across Australia ...
FORUMS - chatting now ...
REVIEWS
"Made bed time less anxious"
by Meld85
My Little Heart Whisbear - the Humming Bear reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›