+ Reply to Thread
Page 10 of 14 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 135
  1. #91
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    27
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    23
    Reviews
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BigRedV View Post
    I don't get the financial argument. Sure Childcare is expensive but they would have already been paying Childcare fees in previous years and budgeted for that. I had 3 in daycare at one stage for 12 months and my eldest could've started school that year here in NSW at aged 4 being born in May so I could've only had 2 in daycare but that's not the right reason to send your child to school.
    I completely get it - we pay $1500 a fortnight for childcare but that will increase to $3000 a fortnight once the rebate is gone (for about 4-5 months each financial year). It's not necessarily right but I completely get the argument! Public schooling is nothing compared to that

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    8,245
    Thanks
    762
    Thanked
    783
    Reviews
    5
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    And what about the kids turning 5 in December, starting school in Jan/Feb then they're in a class with kids turning 6 early the year because their parents held them back so they're not the youngest?
    Last edited by 2BlueBirds; 18-08-2016 at 21:34.

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    13,067
    Thanks
    9,846
    Thanked
    12,960
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 9/1/15Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 7/11/14Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 3/10/14100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by BigRedV View Post
    I find it interesting that the people getting defensive about parents using their right to send their children to school later are the ones who sent their children or are planning to send their children at 4.
    .... It's no more interesting than people supportive of delayed schooling (despite not delaying be a legal right) being the ones who plan on sending their kids when they are 5 or 6.

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    5,749
    Thanks
    3,833
    Thanked
    3,656
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    I think there is no simple answer to this question - it depends so much on the individual child, what's right for one may not be right for another. There are so many factors to consider with prep readiness. And individual schools also need to be considered - and unfortunately what state you live in (as the minimum age and minimum consideration age differ between states). No wonder people get confused.

    Unless you're planning on moving state anytime soon (which might influence your decision), I would be having a discussion with the principal (and potentially a prep teacher if available) at your school of choice to help decide when is best for your individual child.

    As a mother of a child who was born on the cusp (in qld, so a July baby), and also having had the 'consideration age' shifted by one month just this year, I understand the dilemma. We chose not to change his starting year (next year) just because the state suddenly extended the age by a few weeks. And our principal prefers children to start later rather than earlier, unless under exceptional circumstances (all children must have an interview with both principal and prep teachers). We are fortunate however, that our school caters for the more advanced children (in addition to those needing extra help). I was a little worried my DS2 would become bored as he is quite advanced academically (but may not have been ready socially this year).

    I think it's important to have this discussion with your specific preferred school.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    my house
    Posts
    18,046
    Thanks
    1,423
    Thanked
    7,642
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts

    Default What age to start school?

    Quote Originally Posted by VicPark View Post
    .... It's no more interesting than people supportive of delayed schooling (despite not delaying be a legal right) being the ones who plan on sending their kids when they are 5 or 6.
    I'm in NSW. I could send my May and July children the year they were 4 turning 5 or 5 turning 6. It is not actually a legal requirement for children to be enrolled in school in NSW until 6 years old so I'm not sure what legalities you're talking about. I exercised my right to choose the best time for my children to start school and that wasn't breaking any rules or laws.

    In actual fact, school is not even compulsory in every single state and territory for children until 6 years of age except Tasmania where it is 5. So in other words, school is not even a legal requirement until your child turns 6 (or 5 if you're in Tasmania.)

    ETA - FYI vicpark

    http://www.schools.nsw.edu.au/media/...nd_schools.pdf

    Here's a screenshot from that link

    ImageUploadedByThe Bub Hub1471544868.207666.jpg
    Last edited by BigRedV; 19-08-2016 at 03:29.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BigRedV For This Useful Post:

    binnielici  (19-08-2016),cheeeeesecake  (19-08-2016)

  7. #96
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,559
    Thanks
    854
    Thanked
    1,988
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by 2BlueBirds View Post
    And what about the kids turning 5 in December, starting school in Jan/Feb then they're in a class with kids turning 6 early the year because their parents held them back so they're not the youngest?
    I've stayed out of this one so far because I don't really have the energy for it. But I personally believe kids are far far more ready to start school at age 5 turning 6, rather than 4 turning 5. I am a prep teacher, so know my sh!t when it comes to this.

    For me, it has nothing to do with wanting *my* child to be older in comparison to their peers. It's wanting my child to be closer to age 6 than age 4, because I strongly believe and support the research that says 5- 6 year olds are far more ready to learn in a classroom environment and meet thr demands of school, and most 4 year olds are not.

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to cheeeeesecake For This Useful Post:

    atomicmama  (19-08-2016),binnielici  (19-08-2016),harvs  (19-08-2016)

  9. #97
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    13,067
    Thanks
    9,846
    Thanked
    12,960
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 9/1/15Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 7/11/14Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 3/10/14100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by BigRedV View Post
    I'm in NSW. I could send my May and July children the year they were 4 turning 5 or 5 turning 6. It is not actually a legal requirement for children to be enrolled in school in NSW until 6 years old so I'm not sure what legalities you're talking about. I exercised my right to choose the best time for my children to start school and that wasn't breaking any rules or laws.

    In actual fact, school is not even compulsory in every single state and territory for children until 6 years of age except Tasmania where it is 5. So in other words, school is not even a legal requirement until your child turns 6 (or 5 if you're in Tasmania.)

    ETA - FYI vicpark

    http://www.schools.nsw.edu.au/media/...nd_schools.pdf

    Here's a screenshot from that link

    Attachment 83601
    You've missed my point.

  10. #98
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    262
    Thanks
    323
    Thanked
    173
    Reviews
    0
    I think the individual schools approach to the prep learning is a huge factor as well.
    My DS is a Jan baby and started this year at just gone 5. His school is probably close to 30% play based learning in prep and he is thriving.
    If the school was quite structured from prep (I have friends with kids at school where preps have homework etc) I might have held back a year.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to mmaf For This Useful Post:

    AdornedWithCats  (19-08-2016)

  12. #99
    AdornedWithCats's Avatar
    AdornedWithCats is offline Winner 2013 - Spirit of BubHub Award
    Winner 2014 - Best Username

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    8,123
    Thanks
    7,260
    Thanked
    3,653
    Reviews
    17
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the WeekBusiest Member of the Week - week ended 12/6/15Funniest Caption400 Posts in a week300 posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by mmaf View Post
    I think the individual schools approach to the prep learning is a huge factor as well.
    My DS is a Jan baby and started this year at just gone 5. His school is probably close to 30% play based learning in prep and he is thriving.
    If the school was quite structured from prep (I have friends with kids at school where preps have homework etc) I might have held back a year.
    This is likely going to factor a lot in my decision. Ds is a jan baby too and originally I thought I would want to send him at 6 rather than 5. But as he has gotten older I've started to think he would be better off starting at 5.

  13. #100
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8,366
    Thanks
    5,898
    Thanked
    4,929
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 17/4/15100 Posts in a week
    I'll put all my cards on the table here, my DD *may* benefit from staying home until 5 turning 6 (but like I said is ready next year but even more ready the year after - whose kid wouldn't be more ready if at a delayed start) but there's no way in hell she's staying at home another year.

    I need her to go to school next year and if the rules in SA allow it (which they do) she's going to school.

    Yes she will be the youngest but the same daily routine 5 days a week (instead of the 4 different routines throughout the week) will do her good too - she's a stickler for a routine and I finally since the day she was born will get a tiny ounce of my sanity back.

    So my reasons are 2 fold. Judge all you like but sending MY DD at 4 turning 5, 5ish weeks into the school is best for OUR family.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to A-Squared For This Useful Post:

    smallpotatoes  (19-08-2016)


 

Similar Threads

  1. What do your school age kids do after school??
    By Freyamum in forum General Chat
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-02-2016, 19:00
  2. When to start trying for a second?
    By lu552 in forum What Gap between Babies?
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 04-11-2015, 22:02

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
Wendys Music SchoolWendy’s Music School. Experience, Quality and great service! For qualifying students we will get you playing or ...
FORUMS - chatting now ...
REVIEWS
"Pigeon teats rule!"
by Alex
Pigeon PP Wide Neck reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›