+ Reply to Thread
Page 22 of 23 FirstFirst ... 1220212223 LastLast
Results 211 to 220 of 227
  1. #211
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    3,899
    Thanks
    4,556
    Thanked
    1,929
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by Moxy View Post
    The religion question was optional.
    But even if it wasn't, what difference does it make? How is that information useful to anyone outside the ABS?
    In a world FULL of religious NUTS I think that info is very valuable in the wrong hands.

  2. #212
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    3,786
    Thanks
    1,216
    Thanked
    2,134
    Reviews
    15
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    I think the religion question is one of the most important. If only say, 15% of the population identify with Christianity (for example, I have no idea of numbers/stats - I'm making things up here) then you wouldn't want to see the government funneling a heap of money their way.

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Anjalee For This Useful Post:

    Elijahs Mum  (10-08-2016),Moxy  (10-08-2016)

  4. #213
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    3,732
    Thanks
    906
    Thanked
    2,838
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Phony View Post
    In a world FULL of religious NUTS I think that info is very valuable in the wrong hands.
    Really? I honestly don't. Nut jobs are everywhere and kill willy nilly. I'm very doubtful that a religious extremist is going to target an individual person based on the box they ticked on a census. Bombing a random group at a major event, sure, but not a random person based on a census. I think that sort of reaction is OTT to be honest.

  5. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Moxy For This Useful Post:

    A-Squared  (10-08-2016),baby245  (10-08-2016),BettyV  (10-08-2016),Chippa  (10-08-2016),witherwings  (10-08-2016)

  6. #214
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    3,899
    Thanks
    4,556
    Thanked
    1,929
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by Moxy View Post
    I think that sort of reaction is OTT to be honest.
    Well hold that thought until we see who the hackers are.
    The Australian Defence Force have been hacked before by a certain group haven't they. If you can't see why that information would be useful to certain groups then I'm happy for you, but you don't get to tell me I'm having an overreaction.
    Knickers still on here!

  7. #215
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    3,732
    Thanks
    906
    Thanked
    2,838
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Phony View Post
    Well hold that thought until we see who the hackers are.
    The Australian Defence Force have been hacked before by a certain group haven't they. If you can't see why that information would be useful to certain groups then I'm happy for you, but you don't get to tell me I'm having an overreaction.
    Knickers still on here!
    I'm not telling you anything, simply saying that I think if people honestly think that random people care that much about the boring information collected by the census is more valuable than the absolute mountain of information the government and financial institutions already have then yeah, I think getting that paranoid is an overreaction. It's simply my thought.

    My understanding was that no information was "hacked", that it was simply a case of bots being used to deliberately overwhelm the system to basically prove the ABS wrong when they said they had done capacity testing? Not even in the same realm as hacking if that's actually the case. I could be wrong, I can't actually remember where I read that.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Moxy For This Useful Post:

    Meg2  (10-08-2016)

  9. #216
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    395
    Thanks
    187
    Thanked
    384
    Reviews
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Phony View Post
    In a world FULL of religious NUTS I think that info is very valuable in the wrong hands.
    For most people their religion is hardly a private matter, they'll be visiting their church or religious events, and will most likely be happy to tell you their religion if you ask them. Seems a bit extreme to hack into Census data to find out this information. On the other hand, I think a lot of people are interested in the changing religious beliefs and affiliations of our country. Where could they find reliable information about this? Oh yeah, the Census.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Meg2 For This Useful Post:

    A-Squared  (10-08-2016),witherwings  (10-08-2016)

  11. #217
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,158
    Thanks
    1,350
    Thanked
    1,231
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    The identifiable data is stripped from the rest of the form once it's submitted so what does it matter who hacks in and what they use the info for? A "terrorist" will be able to tell that person 12322432321 was catholic at some point in time and they had 6 children. This is definitely going to help them launch an attack.

  12. #218
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8,366
    Thanks
    5,898
    Thanked
    4,929
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 17/4/15100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by VicPark View Post
    #colesandwooliesjustcalledtoconfirmtheyhaverunouto falfoil
    And took everyone's private details when they used their loyalty cards!

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to A-Squared For This Useful Post:

    babyno1onboard  (10-08-2016),VicPark  (10-08-2016)

  14. #219
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,390
    Thanks
    1,583
    Thanked
    2,615
    Reviews
    10
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    So now they saying it was not an attack, just poor system design...

    Man they trully have no idea

    Loving the tweets going on, too funny

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to ExcuseMyFrench For This Useful Post:

    Phony  (10-08-2016)

  16. #220
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    3,899
    Thanks
    4,556
    Thanked
    1,929
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by Moxy View Post
    My understanding was that no information was "hacked", that it was simply a case of bots being used to deliberately overwhelm the system to basically prove the ABS wrong when they said they had done capacity testing? Not even in the same realm as hacking if that's actually the case. I could be wrong, I can't actually remember where I read that.
    Yes that's the spiel so far.


    Quote Originally Posted by Meg2 View Post
    Seems a bit extreme to hack into Census data to find out this information.
    Well, it's not that I think they would specifically try hack the census for this info only but if it's there for the taking...
    It's just an example. There's a lot of defence force workers really concerned about the online version too.
    I would imagine the next census won't even give the paper option.

    Anyway, yeah my real issue is not about the info we give but how we were made to give it.
    Every day there's something on TV or news websites about internet security and how we shouldn't trust it.
    Anything online is at risk of being hacked.
    It's a big ask/demand.

    Quote Originally Posted by witherwings View Post
    The identifiable data is stripped from the rest of the form once it's submitted so what does it matter who hacks in and what they use the info for? A "terrorist" will be able to tell that person 12322432321 was catholic at some point in time and they had 6 children. This is definitely going to help them launch an attack.
    Yeah, true.
    Wonder how quickly does that process happens after we click submit.
    Immediately or are the ABS manually doing that for weeks afterwards like when they used the paper version only?


 

Similar Threads

  1. Census - donor info required for donor conceived children
    By Candiceo in forum General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 13-08-2016, 21:07
  2. TTC-May, 2016 #3
    By Lozz90 in forum Conception & Fertility General Chat
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 01-06-2016, 09:48
  3. TTC - May, 2016 #2
    By Lovemysons in forum Conception & Fertility General Chat
    Replies: 1120
    Last Post: 28-05-2016, 20:45

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
House Call DoctorHouse Call Doctor can provide an urgent after-hours visit to you and your family, when urgent medical situations arise ...
FORUMS - chatting now ...
REVIEWS
"Pigeon teats rule!"
by Alex
Pigeon PP Wide Neck reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›