What about the idea that was floated last year of like the Medicare levy on high income earners making parents who earn a lot but choose public education pay an extra fee or levy because they opt out of the private system?
If you argue private schools get nothing why not charge high income earners a levy to opt into public? Where we lived in Melbourne there were amazing public schools where people moved into the area to send them. Houses cost over $1m in the area but there was also substantial government housing.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 111 to 120 of 208
12-04-2016 21:32 #111
12-04-2016 21:33 #112
In your kid's school's case, their fees don't come close to covering their costs to educate each child. Therefore imo it's fair the govt tops up the fees. But I don't support an elite school who is already getting around 8-10k a year above the rough 16k high school figure per child to get even more funding. They don't need it. We have public schools in disrepair, with no air con as you say, while elite schools are using tax payer funds for frivolous things.
I know that won't be a popular view among some. But the same people in other threads will argue how it's not the tax payer's job to support low income earners and they need to stand on their own two feet. So why should those same funds go to ridiculously wealthy schools?
Last edited by delirium; 12-04-2016 at 21:35.
12-04-2016 21:39 #113-
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
12-04-2016 21:39 #114
Australia is one of the very few oecd countries that funds private schools. Not even private schools in USA receive one cent of taxpayers' money.
Should people who buy cars to use privately receive a subsidy for doing so because they're not using public transport and straining the system? Should we subsidise the same drivers who pay to drive on a private motorway instead of using the public road which their taxes have funded?
The Following User Says Thank You to BigRedV For This Useful Post:
Ra Ra Superstar (13-04-2016)
12-04-2016 21:42 #115
12-04-2016 22:09 #116
12-04-2016 22:15 #117
Taxpayers fund private school orchestra pits and swimming pools...
Just to grind your gears even more..
ImageUploadedByThe Bub Hub1460466886.917939.jpg
Knox grammar school received over $4m in government funding over the past 4 years for capital works 😱
ETA- they only got $3100 per student from the government in 2014 but still.. 4.5m!!!! I drive past this school almost daily and let me tell you, they don't need any extra facilities. But even if they did, their total income in 2014 was over $77m ...
This type of scenario I think, is the main reason for outrage that is highlighted in the original post and related article.
Last edited by witherwings; 12-04-2016 at 22:19.
13-04-2016 05:02 #118
13-04-2016 05:19 #119
all kids should get the SAME amount of govt funding per child, irrespective of parent contribution. Each child is entitled to the same amount of funding regardless of school attended.
Then the govt tops up low SES schools the most and low fee paying a bit too depending on their needs
I have mixed feelings on govt funding for capital works for private schools. I know my old high school hall was funded partially by govt funds and the rest raised by fundraising plus the school took a loan out. That hall ended up being a great social hub for the school. It was the centre of all parish/school events, hired out for private parties/events and used for various after school sports/holiday programs. But there was no way the school could have afforded it otherwise without finding.
I'm concerned that the many of these school communities would miss out if funding was reduced/eliminated.
you guys are aware that many of the elite schools offer fully funded scholarships? And I don't mean 1-3 a year. I know Brisbane grammar girls has 10% of their students under various scholarship programs with uniforms/excursions included. We've got friends who went thru on these programs and it worked brilliantly for them career wise.
13-04-2016 05:57 #120
Well from what we can see,it is a sliding scale. Starting at 3k per child for the elite schools, up to 21k+ for the low ses school. I guess what youre saying (?) is the scale should start at $0 for the elite schools, up to $24k for the low ses. I personally dont agree, but I see what youre saying. I've said similar things with FTB & child care rebate, etc for families over 100 or 150k+. So I understand the point. I do find Sonja's point interesting about an education levy for high income earners.
The Following User Says Thank You to cheeeeesecake For This Useful Post:
By PinkTutu in forum School aged childrenReplies: 18Last Post: 13-10-2016, 07:31
By monnie24 in forum Preschools and SchoolsReplies: 8Last Post: 19-07-2015, 13:12
By SAgirl in forum General ChatReplies: 4Last Post: 26-04-2015, 06:08
Little Kickers NSWLittle Kickers was launched in 2002 in the UK and arrived Down Under in 2009. Our motto is “Play not Push” and we ...
LATESTToilet training: when is the best time to start?Why it is OK for your child to be differentWhat is a blessing way? How is it different to a baby shower?
POPULARWhen can I start giving chores to my children?New baby nursery checklist – a guide to newborn essentialsWhat to pack for labour and hospital – a checklist
FORUMS - chatting now ...
Chickenpox after being immunised?Pro-Vaccination
HGC lelvels stressed please helpConception & Fertility General Chat
Happiness thread.General Chat
April/May TTC group chatConception & Fertility General Chat
Miracle March TTC and Testing ChatConception & Fertility General Chat
Bbt chart thread #8Conception & Fertility General Chat
Married At First Sight 2017Movies / Music / Books / TV Chat