+ Reply to Thread
Page 22 of 28 FirstFirst ... 122021222324 ... LastLast
Results 211 to 220 of 272
  1. #211
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    my house
    Posts
    18,205
    Thanks
    1,433
    Thanked
    7,830
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sonja View Post
    Yes I appreciate that but arguing about the impact of removing negative gearing in the Sydney market is like taking $100000 off Rupert Murdoch.
    I don't think it is futile at all.

  2. #212
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    23,244
    Thanks
    6,365
    Thanked
    17,643
    Reviews
    10
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    Awards:
    Bubhub Blogger - Thanks100 Posts in a week
    Statistically though, households in regional areas earn less than Sydney/capital cities. So the family living in Mildura may pay a lot less to buy/rent, but their factory wages are also a lot less. Obviously I don't have exact figures but I think you'd find when you look at wage:housing ratio it's probably reasonably close. I read people here who live in capital cities saying how they aren't high income and are normal for the city and are earning 150k. Families in rural areas are often earning half that.

    In addition my community is a perfect example of how neg gearing has completely ruined it for many first time home buyers. We are factory workers, farmers, truck drivers, very blue collar. A small proportion of the community has wealth and many have 6 or 7 investment properties. This has driven up prices so many ended up renting. Rental demands are huge now, so rentals prices are completely ridiculous for a small town and now investors are actually in positive gearing bc the rent vs buy price is high. The low to middle income people now can afford mortgage repayments but rent is so high in relation to wages many can't save the deposit. It's actually cheaper to pay off a mortgage here! Return on rentals is over 7%.

  3. #213
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    At the beach
    Posts
    10,495
    Thanks
    1,430
    Thanked
    9,006
    Reviews
    3
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 17/10/14100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by BigRedV View Post
    I don't think it is futile at all.
    Not it's not futile and my analogy was not quite right. I mean more that the problem with Sydney housing prices are not going to be fixed by removing negative gearing alone. It's far more complicated than that

    I think negative gearing should be changed dramatically but I honestly think if anyone thinks that will cause housing prices to drop they're kidding themselves.

    And then when it doesn't the critics will say "see it didn't make a difference" and want to bring it back in.

  4. #214
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,253
    Thanks
    1,395
    Thanked
    1,297
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sonja View Post

    And then when it doesn't the critics will say "see it didn't make a difference" and want to bring it back in.
    I don't think they would bring it back in for that reason. The idea of getting rid of negative gearing is to increase government revenue. I don't actually think it will increase revenue by that much.. People will just find other ways to minimise their tax..

  5. #215
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    23,244
    Thanks
    6,365
    Thanked
    17,643
    Reviews
    10
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    Awards:
    Bubhub Blogger - Thanks100 Posts in a week
    I know negative gearing is not the sole reason for crazy prices, it's much more complex than that. But I do think an overhaul is needed. I don't even think it's should be totally taken away. 1 investment property and that's it is my stance when I become Prime Minister

  6. #216
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8,395
    Thanks
    5,947
    Thanked
    4,952
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 17/4/15100 Posts in a week

  7. #217
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    At the beach
    Posts
    10,495
    Thanks
    1,430
    Thanked
    9,006
    Reviews
    3
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 17/10/14100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by A-Squared View Post
    It's a subscriber only article

  8. #218
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    4,903
    Thanks
    10,209
    Thanked
    4,911
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts

    Default Negative Gearing - Politics talk

    Quote Originally Posted by A-Squared View Post
    Apparently that report that the article is based on is flawed, and contains a crucial error. The authors acknowledged this before it was publicised. The liberals decided to run with it anyway.
    http://m.smh.com.au/federal-politics...in=smart-phone
    Last edited by Little Miss Sunshine; 03-03-2016 at 12:29.

  9. #219
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    my house
    Posts
    18,205
    Thanks
    1,433
    Thanked
    7,830
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to BigRedV For This Useful Post:

    Little Miss Sunshine  (03-03-2016)

  11. #220
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8,395
    Thanks
    5,947
    Thanked
    4,952
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 17/4/15100 Posts in a week

    Default Negative Gearing - Politics talk

    "Mr Hawtrey said the mistake was "an unfortunate typo" that should have read $1.9 trillion but it had no impact on the overall findings. He also stood by the report."

    The article says the report was also done before labour released their plans, but it doesn't say whether the premise of it was scrapping it for established homes and reducing the CGT discount to 25%, but I'm assuming those two things were factored in as the only error Labour are pointing out is a typo.
    Last edited by A-Squared; 03-03-2016 at 13:55.


 

Similar Threads

  1. Change to Negative Gearing tax breaks
    By ExcuseMyFrench in forum News & Current Affairs
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 17-02-2016, 11:56
  2. 8yo quite negative & whingy
    By ICanDream in forum Discipline & behaviour
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-07-2015, 22:31
  3. 8DPT negative HPT
    By Lex23 in forum Conception & Fertility General Chat
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 23-06-2015, 21:18

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
Shapland Swim SchoolsSemi private learn to swim classes for a maximum of 3 children in specialized heated teaching pools. Our swim schools ...
FORUMS - chatting now ...
REVIEWS
"Made bed time less anxious"
by Meld85
My Little Heart Whisbear - the Humming Bear reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›