+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 48
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    3,362
    Thanks
    532
    Thanked
    1,196
    Reviews
    9
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts

    Default Stretch and sweep

    So I am 40+2 with my 3rd baby and I have an appointment with my midwife tomorrow. At my appointment last week she mentioned that at my appointment tomorrow if I haven't had Bub she could do a s&s if I wanted but it was up to me.

    I've never had one pre labour (the midwife did a bit of a stretch when I arrived at hospital in labour with DS1 but I was already in established labour and waters had ruptured 12 hours prior).

    DS1 was born 40+4 but was a long labour that basically started at 40+2, DS2 was born 40+1 with a much shorter labour.

    I'm not overly worried, just a little over being pregnant, I do know that he will arrive in due course. I'm also drinking loads of RLT, using some clarry sage oil to massage on my belly and using EPO. I'm not stressing over doing these things, just more I figure I may aswell do something.

    So my question is, would you get a s&s or not? She mentioned the slight risk of membranes rupturing but hadn't mentioned any other risks so I'm more just curious to any reasons why you wouldn't.

    Also been getting lots and lots of prelabour for a week now so I am quite hopeful that when things properly kick off it won't be to long and drawn out.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    278
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked
    80
    Reviews
    0
    Both pregnancies I have had a s&s done at/just after due date.
    First baby I had her 2 days later, after pre labour for 12 hours. I had a slight hind water leak the next day that cleared up/resealed by the time I was in labour. The first 24 hours after the sweep I had nothing except a little bloody discharge.

    Second time I had Bub 14 hours after the sweep.

    This time, I'll be asking for a sweep at my 40 week appointment again. It doesn't hurt me/I don't find it uncomfortable, and it's the only real intervention I have ever had.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to moto For This Useful Post:

    shani2  (07-02-2016)

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,311
    Thanks
    2,387
    Thanked
    4,599
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    I had a S&S with both pregnancies. Neither encouraged labour - although plenty of contractions.

    I eventually gave birth both times about 10 days later.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to NancyBlackett For This Useful Post:

    shani2  (07-02-2016)

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,390
    Thanks
    1,583
    Thanked
    2,616
    Reviews
    10
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    Yes I would.

    I had one with my first and I'm convinced it kick started labour. I didn't feel a thing either.

    I had planned to have another one at 40wks with my second but she came earlier on her own 😊

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to ExcuseMyFrench For This Useful Post:

    shani2  (07-02-2016)

  8. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    5,013
    Thanks
    972
    Thanked
    3,160
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    I would. Your body sounds like it is getting ready anyway. You sound so chilled out for 40 weeks!

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to twinklify For This Useful Post:

    shani2  (07-02-2016)

  10. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,684
    Thanks
    1,293
    Thanked
    1,834
    Reviews
    9
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Nope i personally wouldn't.
    I had one with ds and it hurt so much and was bleeding for a few days after and ds was born a week later at 41+2. I don't think it did anything to induce labor

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Mod-Zeddie For This Useful Post:

    shani2  (07-02-2016)

  12. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    3,362
    Thanks
    532
    Thanked
    1,196
    Reviews
    9
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mod-Zeddie View Post
    Nope i personally wouldn't.
    I had one with ds and it hurt so much and was bleeding for a few days after and ds was born a week later at 41+2. I don't think it did anything to induce labor
    See I've only had a few internals - only had 1 with DS2 but had a couple with DS1 and I didn't really feel them, however I'm not sure if it'd be different if I wasn't in labour.

  13. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    3,362
    Thanks
    532
    Thanked
    1,196
    Reviews
    9
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NancyBlackett View Post
    I had a S&S with both pregnancies. Neither encouraged labour - although plenty of contractions.

    I eventually gave birth both times about 10 days later.
    See that's my concern, I'm already having lots of contractions. But really, both my previous labours started really from when my membranes broke.

  14. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,311
    Thanks
    2,387
    Thanked
    4,599
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    The first time I was slightly dilated but nothing else was conducive to labour - and I was eventually induced. The second time I was ripe and ready yet it still didn't make a difference.

    Most people have much more instant results! My babies arrive quickly when they're ready. They just don't take any hints until then.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to NancyBlackett For This Useful Post:

    shani2  (07-02-2016)

  16. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    5,013
    Thanks
    972
    Thanked
    3,160
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Maybe the 'small' chance of membrane rupture can be a blessing lol.

    I'd say just see how you feel on the day.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to twinklify For This Useful Post:

    shani2  (07-02-2016)


 

Similar Threads

  1. Stretch & Sweep Success Stories?
    By No3please in forum Pregnancy & Birth General Chat
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 15-01-2016, 22:14
  2. Did a stretch and sweep help start labour?
    By cheekychook in forum Pregnancy & Birth General Chat
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 26-08-2015, 10:00
  3. Bleeding after stretch and sweep
    By babyblu11 in forum Third Trimester Chat
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-03-2015, 14:18

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
Melbourne Natural Medicine ClinicLeading natural health practitioners in fertility, preconception, pregnancy, and children's health. We take an ...
REVIEWS
"Pigeon teats rule!"
by Alex
Pigeon PP Wide Neck reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›