+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    17,991
    Thanks
    5,349
    Thanked
    9,041
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    Awards:
    Past Moderator - Thank you
    100 Posts in a week
    To use for stock? Nope.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to misskittyfantastico For This Useful Post:

    Frankenmum  (28-01-2016)

  3. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,393
    Thanks
    504
    Thanked
    1,522
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    I would if there were no faces showing... and if I got a cut of any money made selling them! Even a one-off fee.
    I just assume that any photo I put online (here or on facebook or blogs or whatever) is entering the public domain and is utterly out of my hands, so I'm not too precious about them.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to deku For This Useful Post:

    Frankenmum  (28-01-2016)

  5. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    5,338
    Thanks
    5,293
    Thanked
    5,085
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by sunnygirl79 View Post
    Your photos would be able to be used for ANYTHING. I mean, do you really want your family photos used for (potentially) things such as: haemorrhoid cream commercials. ...
    This reminded me of drug company ads in America that always list off the potential side effects in a cheery voice... 'side effects may include dry mouth, shivering and anal leakage...' while showing a couple laughing together, walking hand in hand.

    Don't be the anal leakage couple frankenmum.

  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to HollyGolightly81 For This Useful Post:

    babyno1onboard  (28-01-2016),bezzy  (28-01-2016),Frankenmum  (28-01-2016),Mum-I-Am  (28-01-2016)

  7. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    2,825
    Thanks
    2,914
    Thanked
    2,681
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by HollyGolightly81 View Post
    Don't be the anal leakage couple frankenmum.
    ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Frankenmum For This Useful Post:

    HollyGolightly81  (28-01-2016)

  9. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,292
    Thanks
    595
    Thanked
    460
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    As sad as it is, if you're holding hands with your son, these type of photos often accompany articles about child abuse, so it's not worth that risk IMO.


 

Similar Threads

  1. Which is better and WWYD?
    By Mod-Nomsie in forum General Chat
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 01-11-2015, 20:26
  2. Wwyd?
    By debsch in forum General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-05-2015, 19:49
  3. Wwyd?
    By amyd in forum General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 22-04-2015, 17:58

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
Baby SensoryBaby Sensory is the only baby programme that offers a complete approach to learning & development. Our classes ...
FORUMS - chatting now ...
REVIEWS
"Made bed time less anxious"
by Meld85
My Little Heart Whisbear - the Humming Bear reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›