And to add, maybe while this idiot wants to bring in these measures he could also outline how we can get deadbeat fathers to start paying their CS. Aust non-custodials owe BILLIONS. If we not only were tougher, but set min CS amounts that were meaningful maybe men (and I say men as 85% of non custodials are male) might stop sitting on benefits themselves and working for cash and get a proper job! Imagine the savings to the tax payer if these men actually supported their kids
+ Reply to Thread
Results 81 to 85 of 85
07-01-2016 11:34 #81
07-01-2016 12:49 #82
I really appreciate how joining bubhub and listening to the lives of others has opened my eyes to life in Australia. Pre-bubhub I probably would have sort-of agreed with this idiot. I lived in my affluent little bubble socialising with my affluent bubble friends and couldn't understand how people could be unemployed and on welfare if they didn't want to be. I didn't know that families were struggling to buy clothes for their kids, pay doctors bills, food, etc. Sure I understood that this was common overseas and I had great sympathy to the plight of those in developing countries but little empathy for my fellow Aussies. Now I get it, I think (I hope!) and my views have changed substantially. Thanks bubhub
07-01-2016 13:27 #83
07-01-2016 13:32 #84
I don't personally know anyone on the welfare (beyond taking the 18 weeks ppl) but I think if there are people out there who do rely wholly on their centrelink payments to support their family, and they already have a few kids, then yes, there needs to be some kind of limit. you can't expect the public purse to support you and your expanding family if you haven't the means to do it yourself.
I just think the implanted contraceptive seems very basic and crude as a means to implement this. it's also bloody sexist as what about men? plus it's not fool proof. people still fall pregnant on contraceptives.
why not just introduce a rule and say "beyond 3 kids, your parenting payments will not increase for each subsequent child you have". puts the onus back on the welfare recipient.
07-01-2016 14:45 #85
By sarebare81 in forum Product Recommendations & QuestionsReplies: 22Last Post: 20-04-2016, 14:19
By TeBe in forum Weightloss & Fitness ChallengesReplies: 15Last Post: 26-06-2015, 11:20
Little Rugby NSWCatch, weave, chase, run, but most of all have FUN! Little Rugby runs a NSW network of fun, safe and non-contact footy ...
LATESTSurrogacy and why many parents break the lawHow to get your kids to bring home empty lunch boxesIs the secret to saving for your child’s education in your home loan?
POPULARWhen can I start giving chores to my children?New baby nursery checklist – a guide to newborn essentialsWhat to pack for labour and hospital – a checklist
FORUMS - chatting now ...
Any recommendations for convertible stroller?Product Recommendations & Questions
WorriedFirst Trimester Chat
April/May TTC group chatConception & Fertility General Chat
Early risers .... 7 and 5 yearsGeneral Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
Increased bleeding 2 weeks post-partumPregnancy & Birth General Chat
IVF Babies due Sep/Oct/Nov 2017 #2pregnancy and babies through IVF
Help with 7 week scan interpretationFirst Trimester Chat
Work from homeWorking From Home