+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 51
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    17,802
    Thanks
    5,160
    Thanked
    8,754
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    Awards:
    Past Moderator - Thank you
    100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by harvs View Post
    This is quite interesting:

    http://theconversation.com/six-reaso...ty-drugs-34073

    I'm undecided myself but leaning towards the yes - at least to the strongly encourage with no repercussions part.

    To me it's kind of like when pubs started giving free soft drink to desi drivers or clubs (in my day they are called recovery? The ones that are open from like 5am - 11am) giving out free bottled water - a gesture to try and support people in having the safest night out possible.

    I don't really buy that it would encourage drug use, and I think the stats around improving quality in the black market overall etc are rather compelling.
    Yeah I think I'm with you in that drug use is a given in our society, and as a society we should try and make it as safe as possible - a bit like selling fit packs which we used to do when I worked at a chemist twenty years ago, not sure what they're called now but they were clean needles and very cheap.
    I agree that I don't think it encourages drug use. Drug use is never "safe" you never know what's going to happen but I think you can make it "safer".

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to misskittyfantastico For This Useful Post:

    harvs  (21-09-2015)

  3. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,392
    Thanks
    504
    Thanked
    1,522
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Absolutely, but I think a lot of illegal drugs should be legal, so am definitely in the "harm minimisation" camp.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to deku For This Useful Post:

    harvs  (21-09-2015),Moxy  (22-09-2015)

  5. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    2,256
    Thanks
    3,924
    Thanked
    2,278
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts

    Default Would you support...

    This is a hard one.

    I have to go with a reluctant yes, I have older children, if they were going to take drugs I would rather they survived the experience. It's a very reluctant yes though.
    Last edited by Mokeybear; 21-09-2015 at 21:44.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Mokeybear For This Useful Post:

    harvs  (21-09-2015)

  7. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    8,544
    Thanks
    1,351
    Thanked
    2,308
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    No

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to sunnyflower For This Useful Post:

    harvs  (21-09-2015)

  9. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    3,420
    Thanks
    4,498
    Thanked
    3,389
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Yes I definitely support harm reduction strategies like this. I worked in the alcohol and other drug sector for many years and I'm a very strong advocate of harm reduction.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to gingermillie For This Useful Post:

    harvs  (21-09-2015)

  11. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    5,145
    Thanks
    998
    Thanked
    3,238
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by gingermillie View Post
    Yes I definitely support harm reduction strategies like this. I worked in the alcohol and other drug sector for many years and I'm a very strong advocate of harm reduction.
    So is this something that can maybe described as the next step after supervised injecting rooms (do they still have this in Sydney btw?)

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to twinklify For This Useful Post:

    harvs  (21-09-2015)

  13. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,593
    Thanks
    1,654
    Thanked
    2,739
    Reviews
    10
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    Yes, it would be a good public health policy. Cheap and efficient.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to ExcuseMyFrench For This Useful Post:

    harvs  (21-09-2015)

  15. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    930
    Thanks
    216
    Thanked
    297
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Oohh tough one. I can see the benefit of trying to help stop people taking dirty/contaminated drugs. However, it is not reducing the problem, just a consequence. What happens if a person gets a testing kit which ok's the drug, person has an unexpected reaction (physical or mental) & either hurts/kills someone or themselves? It could be argued that the provider of the test is liable (morally & legally) because they contributed to the drug being taken.

    I'm leaning more towards having more resources put into catching those taking or dealing/manufacturing drugs & diverting them into appropriate areas. That is, addiction help for the average user & criminal proceedings for dealers. I know it can be a whole lot more complex than that, but that should be the base of it.

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using The Bub Hub mobile app

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Izzys Dragon For This Useful Post:

    harvs  (21-09-2015)

  17. #19
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3,287
    Thanks
    1,296
    Thanked
    3,176
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Izzys Dragon View Post
    What happens if a person gets a testing kit which ok's the drug, person has an unexpected reaction (physical or mental) & either hurts/kills someone or themselves? It could be argued that the provider of the test is liable (morally & legally) because they contributed to the drug being taken.



    Sent from my GT-I9505 using The Bub Hub mobile app
    Harm minimisation doesn't work like that, just so you know

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Full House For This Useful Post:

    harvs  (21-09-2015),Izzys Dragon  (22-09-2015)

  19. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    7,345
    Thanks
    4,978
    Thanked
    4,457
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    yes I do support it. people will take the substance regardless, why not provide a level of assurance that it's at least pure/what they're expecting it to be. someone might still die from an overdose of the pure drug but at least they know it's not laced with rat poison.

    as a former attendee of these kinds of events and frequent drug taker/pill popper, I can only thank my lucky stars none of us ended up OD-ing or dead. did the risk put us off taking them? no. but test kits would've made it a bit safer.

  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to turquoisecoast For This Useful Post:

    harvs  (21-09-2015),Lincolns mummy  (21-09-2015)


 

Similar Threads

  1. New and looking for some support TTC
    By cluckles in forum Introductions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 27-03-2015, 23:40
  2. Support for anyone TTC
    By terrastrega in forum Contraception issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 18-12-2014, 18:26

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
Baby MonitorsLooking to buy a baby monitor? :: Read viewer reviews of baby monitors BEFORE you buy :: Buy at a local or online Baby ...
REVIEWS
"Made bed time less anxious"
by Meld85
My Little Heart Whisbear - the Humming Bear reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›