+ Reply to Thread
Page 21 of 51 FirstFirst ... 11192021222331 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 210 of 509
  1. #201
    BH-KatiesMum's Avatar
    BH-KatiesMum is offline Community Manager
    Winner 2008 - The most optimistic poster
    Winner 2014 - Most Helpful Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Perth WA
    Posts
    22,671
    Thanks
    5,501
    Thanked
    5,965
    Reviews
    3
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    Awards:
    Past Moderator
    200 Posts in a week100 Posts in a week
    The current work/study test is for the CCR

    from what I understand (and it is complex) those who get FTB part A can get various amounts of subsidised childcare (both CCR and CCB) without meeting the work/study test.

  2. #202
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    617
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked
    299
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ChelleBH View Post
    I see a lot of people saying working mums will suffer if their work entitlement is less than govt PPL - I understood the new proposal to mean that you could CHOOSE one or the other ie. if your work pays you 4 weeks and that equates to less than govt PPL you'd choose govt PPL..?
    Yes that is my understanding also. However the govt would then need to take into consideration that payment occuring ONLY after birth plus the possible 28 day wait isnt going to be sufficient. As it would leave mothers with a good 2-3 months with no payment when its needed.

  3. #203
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,390
    Thanks
    1,583
    Thanked
    2,615
    Reviews
    10
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    @BH-KatiesMum

    This little mention here "85 per cent back per child of the actual fee or benchmark price (whichever is lower)" raises alarm bells to me.

    It actually means that working families from inner cities will get between 50% and 85% of that benchmark price.
    The productivity commission estimated that price to be $79 per day. So parents would get between $39 and $67 back per day.

    Most inner cities childcare charge between $100-$120 per day if not more.

    Effectively inner cities parents would therefore get between 33 and 56% back...!

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to ExcuseMyFrench For This Useful Post:

    BH-KatiesMum  (11-05-2015)

  5. #204
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    5,897
    Thanks
    3,192
    Thanked
    1,649
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ScubaGal View Post
    Slated for 2017 but hopefully never. Labor and Greens have both said they will not support it or the previous budget measures in the senate.
    I read effective July 2016 for ppl, childcare changes effective 2017

  6. #205
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Inner West
    Posts
    3,267
    Thanks
    1,892
    Thanked
    1,916
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the WeekBusiest Member of the Week - week ended 19/9/2014Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 17/7/2014200 Posts in a week100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by Lil Smurfy View Post
    I read effective July 2016 for ppl, childcare changes effective 2017
    Yep. But it will be hard to pass before July 2016 and next year is an election year (most likely - the deadline for the election is Jan 2017 and it'll get called before then).

  7. #206
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    404
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked
    137
    Reviews
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ExcuseMyFrench View Post
    @BH-KatiesMum

    This little mention here "85 per cent back per child of the actual fee or benchmark price (whichever is lower)" raises alarm bells to me.

    It actually means that working families from inner cities will get between 50% and 85% of that benchmark price.
    The productivity commission estimated that price to be $79 per day. So parents would get between $39 and $67 back per day.

    Most inner cities childcare charge between $100-$120 per day if not more.

    Effectively inner cities parents would therefore get between 33 and 56% back...!
    I read somewhere that the benchmark is $110 but I can't remember where I read it.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Amber4304 For This Useful Post:

    ExcuseMyFrench  (11-05-2015),MINIRoo  (11-05-2015)

  9. #207
    BH-KatiesMum's Avatar
    BH-KatiesMum is offline Community Manager
    Winner 2008 - The most optimistic poster
    Winner 2014 - Most Helpful Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Perth WA
    Posts
    22,671
    Thanks
    5,501
    Thanked
    5,965
    Reviews
    3
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    Awards:
    Past Moderator
    200 Posts in a week100 Posts in a week
    yes that is the bit that concerned me too. What they set as the benchmark.

    I understood it to be high at the moment ... but it is very likely that it wont keep pace with actual costs

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to BH-KatiesMum For This Useful Post:

    ExcuseMyFrench  (11-05-2015)

  11. #208
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,383
    Thanks
    709
    Thanked
    1,955
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    I'd love to know where in Perth I can get my DD in for the benchmark. We're on a list for two and one is $110 a day and the other $120 a day. We've been on the list since September last year before she was even born.....

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Molros For This Useful Post:

    ExcuseMyFrench  (11-05-2015)

  13. #209
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,390
    Thanks
    1,583
    Thanked
    2,615
    Reviews
    10
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by Amber4304 View Post
    I read somewhere that the benchmark is $110 but I can't remember where I read it.
    Ah! much better than $79
    I hope they keep revising the benchmark every year...

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to ExcuseMyFrench For This Useful Post:

    Molros  (11-05-2015)

  15. #210
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    3,270
    Thanks
    326
    Thanked
    990
    Reviews
    13
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by beebs View Post
    66k are year is not a lot surely? It doesn't take into account the amount of children either. Sure 66K for one person is perfectly fine, but what if someone has 3, 4, 5 kids? It wouldn't go anywhere. It is just going to make it harder for those who are already on low incomes. Gah!
    To me no, but I've seen families on here say their total combined income is under 40k

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to maternidade For This Useful Post:

    beebs  (11-05-2015),KitiK  (11-05-2015)


 

Similar Threads

  1. The Budget!! #2
    By beebs in forum News & Current Affairs
    Replies: 267
    Last Post: 07-07-2014, 12:12
  2. What does the budget mean for you
    By loislane2010 in forum General Chat
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 24-05-2014, 13:49
  3. The Budget?
    By Ellewood in forum News & Current Affairs
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 18-05-2014, 18:44

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
KindyROOKindyROO offers activities for babies & toddlers in a fun learning centre, focussing on developmental education. ...
REVIEWS
"Pigeon teats rule!"
by Alex
Pigeon PP Wide Neck reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›