+ Reply to Thread
Page 19 of 42 FirstFirst ... 9171819202129 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 190 of 415
  1. #181
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    my house
    Posts
    18,205
    Thanks
    1,433
    Thanked
    7,830
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by VicPark View Post
    Either highlight where my views in this thread are inconsistent with the other thread or zip it/accept the title of stirrer.
    Don't tell me what to do. Your views are hypocritical. Full stop.

  2. #182
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    5,005
    Thanks
    1,052
    Thanked
    3,524
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    I'm not talking about what VP said in particular but I don't think it's hypocritical to claim entitlements even if you don't philosophically believe in them.

    I didn't vote Tony in - not my responsibility when he makes changes the country doesn't agree with. But I'm not going to turn down $50k if it's available.

    I would still prefer a different party to be in power where such payments were likely not forthcoming!

  3. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to kw123 For This Useful Post:

    A-Squared  (01-05-2014),babyla  (01-05-2014),ExcuseMyFrench  (01-05-2014),smallpotatoes  (01-05-2014)

  4. #183
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    13,067
    Thanks
    9,846
    Thanked
    12,964
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 9/1/15Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 7/11/14Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 3/10/14100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by BigRedV View Post
    Don't tell me what to do. Your views are hypocritical. Full stop.
    So you were just looking for an opportunity to attack and can't actually back what you are saying. Roger that, hope your day improves.

  5. #184
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    13,067
    Thanks
    9,846
    Thanked
    12,964
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 9/1/15Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 7/11/14Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 3/10/14100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by babyla View Post
    Sorry if you've answered this VP (I'm popping in and out of this thread casually) - why is it that you support 18 weeks? It's about 4.5 months so not long before the 6 month breast feeding recommendations..
    It's at minimum wage and is more affordable. The 26 weeks I think is way too long... Just crosses a psychological barrier for me. And the original plan was for 26 weeks full pay capped at $100,000 which I think is too expensive. It's not fair on businesses who already have to find a replacement employee and it's not fair on taxpayers. And I suppose I am not really a socialist: I believe people should pay their own way more.

  6. #185
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    3,321
    Thanks
    335
    Thanked
    1,002
    Reviews
    13
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by VicPark View Post
    It's at minimum wage and is more affordable. The 26 weeks I think is way too long... Just crosses a psychological barrier for me. And the original plan was for 26 weeks full pay capped at $100,000 which I think is too expensive. It's not fair on businesses who already have to find a replacement employee and it's not fair on taxpayers. And I suppose I am not really a socialist: I believe people should pay their own way more.
    You obviously DONT understand what was proposed.
    Original cap for income was 150k ( full years wage) so 6 months of that would be 75k.
    Now it's 100k so 6 months would be 50k

    Edit- also isn't it better for employers to have longer time with new employees ( rather than hire someone for 18 weeks then get rid of them) AND tax payers are NOT footing the bill

    Maybe you should educate yourself before posting
    Last edited by maternidade; 01-05-2014 at 10:49.

  7. #186
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    13,067
    Thanks
    9,846
    Thanked
    12,964
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 9/1/15Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 7/11/14Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 3/10/14100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by maternidade View Post
    You obviously DONT understand what was proposed.
    Original cap for income was 150k ( full years wage) so 6 months of that would be 75k.
    Now it's 100k so 6 months would be 50k

    Edit- also isn't it better for employers to have longer time with new employees ( rather than hire someone for 18 weeks then get rid of them) AND tax payers are NOT footing the bill

    Maybe you should educate yourself before posting
    Sorry I was typing as I was walking the pram... $150,000 , $100,000 either way I think it's a load of poo. But I sincerely aplogise for the obvious distress that my typo has caused you

  8. #187
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8,395
    Thanks
    5,947
    Thanked
    4,952
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 17/4/15100 Posts in a week
    Sorry, but a mum is a mum is a mum and a dad is a dad is a dad. If you don't work, you should get the new PPL at the minimum wage. If you do work, you should get it at your pay rate, if you earn over $100k, you should still get it, but at the same rate a parent earning $100k would get it.

    I guess we have to look at why these changes are being proposed. Does Tony Abott want to keep mums at home for longer 'where they should be' (not my opinion at all, but I'm sure it is his!) or is it so that employers will stop their payments (may not happen in every business) hence making them increase their profits ie looking after businesses, or something else???

    having said that, I don't agree with the new arrangements, when they are thinking of cutting many benefits including FTB and taxing those earning over $80k. Those changes are almost being put in place to counteract the ridiculous amounts of money the government is planning on forking out PPL.
    Last edited by A-Squared; 01-05-2014 at 12:12. Reason: Typo

  9. #188
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8,395
    Thanks
    5,947
    Thanked
    4,952
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 17/4/15100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by Lili81 View Post
    So you actually agree with me
    I'm saying that we should get our super contributions paid while on 18 weeks on PPL. I never mentioned an extended leave.

    In my home country, where we don't believe that a women's place is at home and happy to support each other through tax, the more babies you had the earlier one can access their defined benefit pension.

    Oh also childcare and school are free.

    Oh also you get your full salary for 4-6 months on maternity leave.

    Oh also you get paid to be a SAHM.

    You'd think that most people have 5 kids family hey?!

    Still kicking hubby to go back there lol
    Can I ask for an in a nutshell summary of how taxation works there? Eg tax rates, do they have brackets, do they have welfare?
    Last edited by A-Squared; 01-05-2014 at 12:11. Reason: Typo

  10. #189
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    7,877
    Thanks
    3,397
    Thanked
    5,160
    Reviews
    8
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by VicPark View Post
    It's at minimum wage and is more affordable. The 26 weeks I think is way too long... Just crosses a psychological barrier for me. And the original plan was for 26 weeks full pay capped at $100,000 which I think is too expensive. It's not fair on businesses who already have to find a replacement employee and it's not fair on taxpayers. And I suppose I am not really a socialist: I believe people should pay their own way more.
    Thanks. I also wouldn't class myself as a socialist but I don't see ppl as welfare either, it serves a bigger purpose than just giving people a hand out. I think the labour, family landscape has changed so much that we need to provide families with better support not saying I agree with what's on offer either.

    I think I like @Lili81 idea - 75%, 26 weeks plus super. I'd go the super over the payment to be honest - the super is the biggest concern for me staying out of the workforce for too long. My mum was out 10 years and it has knocked a massive whack out of her super compared to others that even went back in 5 years. I also think super provides us with an important safety net as individuals and as a nation.

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to babyla For This Useful Post:

    ExcuseMyFrench  (01-05-2014),VicPark  (01-05-2014)

  12. #190
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    my house
    Posts
    18,205
    Thanks
    1,433
    Thanked
    7,830
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by VicPark View Post
    So you were just looking for an opportunity to attack and can't actually back what you are saying. Roger that, hope your day improves.
    I think it's hypocritical of you to say people should save up but then complain you have to reduce your mortgage because you're relying on ppl.

    My my day is fine, thanks


 

Similar Threads

  1. Paid Parental Leave
    By Silvana in forum General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-07-2013, 23:29
  2. Paid parental leave
    By joannamarie in forum General Chat
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 17-05-2013, 07:51
  3. Paid parental leave
    By joannamarie in forum News & Current Affairs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 16-05-2013, 00:42

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
Little Rugby NSWCatch, weave, chase, run, but most of all have FUN! Little Rugby runs a NSW network of fun, safe and non-contact footy ...
FORUMS - chatting now ...
Help with BBT chartConception & Fertility General Chat
❤Joyous June/July TTC!❤Conception & Fertility General Chat
Very Very Early Signs!Conception & Fertility General Chat
Preparing for a NICU babyPregnancy & Birth General Chat
Anyone have kids with NF1?General Child Health Issues
REVIEWS
"Made bed time less anxious"
by Meld85
My Little Heart Whisbear - the Humming Bear reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›