I heard about this controversial proposal of the UK's on the radio this morning and when posed the question to the radio listeners, as expected, there were those who were vehemently against the idea, and others (namely adult children of parent who conceived over the age of 40) not in favour.
*Please be mindful in your answers as this is a sensitive subject for many of our members.*
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 49
27-02-2014 09:12 #1
Survey Calls for IVF to be banned for all women over the age of 40
Last edited by Mod-Uniquey; 27-02-2014 at 10:30. Reason: oops, meant to write 'not in favour' as opposed to 'in favour'
27-02-2014 09:20 #2
For me, I don't feel comfortable with any notion that imposes an age restriction on a woman's right to bare children, provided they can support those children. I know that a lot of women spend many years of heartache on the IVF/ fertility train and often come out broken. I understand the UK is concerned about the cost of IVF to the NHS health system over there, hence wanting a cut off for IVF rounds.
Last edited by Mod-Uniquey; 27-02-2014 at 09:26. Reason: typo
27-02-2014 09:42 #3
It makes me angry that there is a perception that an older mother isn't going to be a good mother - what the hell?
I think anyone judging anyone's parenting potential based solely on their age needs to take a step back and mind their own business.
I have no issue with a woman over 40 going through IVF in order to conceive a child. It's a hard road, and it simply shows to me that the woman is yearning to be a mother. She is desperate to have a child to love. What's wrong with that? What makes a young mum better?
I've frequently heard young mothers bag out older mothers, and of course young mums cop a lot of judgement too. We see it here all the time. If people are happy with the age they were when they had children, that's great - leave it at that. Enjoy your own personal sense of satisfaction without telling others they are too young/too old. We all shouldn't have to defend our choices.
27-02-2014 09:51 #4
I haven't read the article but I think 40 is too young to be the cut-off.
I do however think there is a point where IVF shouldn't be an option. There comes a point where IVF & pregnancy become too risky for mother and baby so that needs to outweigh a desire for biological children. It should be a decision made by highly qualified specialists in the area if an age restriction is imposed.
27-02-2014 09:51 #5
I think it should be up to the individual woman/couple when they want to stop. There's too many factors as to why a woman may still need IVF after 40.
27-02-2014 10:02 #6Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
It doesn't bother me one bit what age a woman (or man) has a child. I'm pretty sure in our grandparents era it was relatively common to have a child or two in your 40s actually.
However, I don't think it is out of the question to ask if it is a wise use of health $$ to fund IVF for women that have an approx. 2% chance of conceiving. I'm sorry if that offends anyone, but our government health budget has a lot to stretch to, and with such small odds of success, I'm not sure if it couldn't be more wisely allocated.
That is not a judgement call on people's ability to be a good parent, it's just my 2c.
27-02-2014 10:07 #7
I think 40 is too young for women to be cut-off but I do agree with PP that there is a point in time where it needs to stop due to health risks to mother and baby. If the odds of falling pregnant are also getting slimmer and slimmer with advancing age, couples end up losing thousands and thousands of $$ to IVF, with no end result that just prolongs heartache, and I have trouble with how ethical this is. I don't feel its right for doctors/clinics to continue taking money from people when their chances of falling pregnant are next to none.
I don't think IVF should be available to women who have hit menopause (unless the woman had early menopause eg age 30) so I guess that is where my personal cut-off is.
27-02-2014 10:23 #8
I would like to hear what the 'adult children' of older moms are saying
10-03-2014 21:21 #9
The Following User Says Thank You to bhjules For This Useful Post:
10-03-2014 21:26 #10
Many women have a baby naturally at 40, i think it's way too young a cut off.
The Following User Says Thank You to Clementine Grace For This Useful Post:
By sugartweety10 in forum Research HelpReplies: 1Last Post: 27-03-2014, 12:46
By aimeeclaire in forum Research HelpReplies: 5Last Post: 25-02-2014, 21:12
By DesperatelySeekingSleep in forum House & GardensReplies: 5Last Post: 20-11-2013, 15:55
Wendys Music SchoolWendy’s Music School. Experience, Quality and great service! For qualifying students we will get you playing or ...
LATESTToilet training: when is the best time to start?Why it is OK for your child to be differentWhat is a blessing way? How is it different to a baby shower?
POPULARWhen can I start giving chores to my children?New baby nursery checklist – a guide to newborn essentialsWhat to pack for labour and hospital – a checklist
FORUMS - chatting now ...
Dr Antony Lighten - Appreciation threadpregnancy and babies through IVF
Funniest thing your kid has said to youGeneral Chat
Rude 10 year old. Ideas?General Chat
Egg/donor code discussion - South AfricaEgg Donation
Happiness thread.General Chat
Awesome Mums of Autistic kids-how many of us are there (#3)????????Parents of Children with Special Needs
Support out there? ED issues, ttcMale Infertility Issues