Wow I would like to learn more details as well as given the basic information it does sound horrendous!
There must be a lot more to this story, surely?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 11 to 20 of 45
01-12-2013 14:02 #11
01-12-2013 14:03 #12
01-12-2013 14:05 #13
Even if the reasoning for doing so was because of the stability or danger of the mum (though the reasoning mentioned in the article do not sit well with me) would not putting the mother through what they have done been worse on her then had they gone about it in a different way.
As if anyone would come out of being sedated and operated on, one minute being pregnant then waking up not being pregnant. Any better then they went it.
Its scary and sad to think people can do that to another person. Imo it couldve been dealt with in a manner that was less horrifying for that woman. I can only imagine what someone who has had that or similar done to them must go through and feel, im sure its absolutely gut wrenching.
01-12-2013 14:09 #14
But if she is stable now and cannot be reunited with her daughter? That is really sad .
But I guess we have no idea of the mothers current condition, or anything about the extended family and how suitable they are to care for the child.
01-12-2013 14:14 #15
The Following User Says Thank You to Atropos For This Useful Post:
01-12-2013 14:32 #16
01-12-2013 14:35 #17
I think one of three things here is the truth, either
a. This actually happened and there is a law that has allowed this to happen and the council won't be held liable,
b. This actually happened but the council has done this outside of any current laws and will be held liable for doing this or;
c. There is far more to this story and this didn't happen as reported.
I would hope for everyone's sake scenario c is the truth.
The Following User Says Thank You to A-Squared For This Useful Post:
01-12-2013 14:51 #18
This is really perplexing, I really hope someone releases more information on why something so extreme was done, and why the baby is still in custody I'm kind of hoping it is a hoax or mistake (someone relaying info from the onion news network or something similar).
01-12-2013 14:54 #19
01-12-2013 15:07 #20
I, too, am having trouble believing this story is true because it's so appalling.
The part that has me most confused is why they didn't contact the correct/any Italian authorities a. while she was in care, before any decisions were made and b. once the baby was born.
The MAMA CentrePregnancy, birth & beyond care with your very own midwife. Home & hospital birth support, VBACs, antenatal & postnatal ...
LATESTWhat is a blessing way? How is it different to a baby shower?7 ways to break the ‘mumnotony’ at homeGuide to government family benefit payments
POPULARWhen can I start giving chores to my children?New baby nursery checklist – a guide to newborn essentialsWhat to pack for labour and hospital – a checklist
FORUMS - chatting now ...
IVF babies due Sep/Oct/Nov 2017pregnancy and babies through IVF
What do you think is the best resource for new Mums?General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
Lite & Easy ???Second Trimester Chat
Bulk-Billing may end for after-hours home doctor services - petition!Can you help with these campaigns?
Support group, gay/lesbian planning pregnancySame Sex Parents
IVF babies due June/July/August 2017pregnancy and babies through IVF