+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    23,244
    Thanks
    6,365
    Thanked
    17,643
    Reviews
    10
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    Awards:
    Bubhub Blogger - Thanks100 Posts in a week
    see, good detective skills huh

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to delirium For This Useful Post:

    bel2466  (27-01-2014),Lauzy  (27-01-2014)

  3. #12
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,551
    Thanks
    655
    Thanked
    824
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnC View Post
    Good question.

    If you actually read the article you'll find the answer, which in short is that the speculation surrounding Prince George was the creation of myth-makers in the Anglo-American Jewish communities, who sought support for their own practice of infant circumcision in an imaginary royal tradition.

    The issue addressed is how, and why, contemporary legends are generated.
    Thanks for that, I did actually read the article. It's clear you care about the circumcision of the Royals but it's still unclear why? What difference does it make to you or Anglo-American Jewish people? Hopefully, regardless of what they do or don't do, it isn't going to influence anyone. Myth or not. I don't understand why someone would write an article about this. Each to their own.

  4. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,310
    Thanks
    136
    Thanked
    808
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by moosey View Post
    I don't understand why someone would write an article about this.
    Well, since you've read the article let me give you an example. A central player in this sorry saga is Edgar Schoen who, as we reveal, invented the link between the imaginary Davidic lineage of the English monarchy and a royal circumcision "tradition". Now Schoen is not just any old dude. He was the chair of 1989 American Academy of Pediatrics Taskforce on Circumcision, and was for two decades the most high-profile proponent of routine infant circumcision worldwide.

    So myth meets reality, and it does influence people's decisions. Which is why a systematic academic article on this history has some value, IMO.


 

Similar Threads

  1. Myth busted
    By Father in forum Pro-Circumcision
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-11-2013, 00:18
  2. The pregnant ***** - Myth or Fact?
    By Sally1981 in forum Pregnancy & Birth General Chat
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 28-10-2012, 13:30

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
ProSwimProSwim runs learn to swim classes for babies, children and adults. Our indoor centre in Plympton Park has lessons all ...
REVIEWS
"Made bed time less anxious"
by Meld85
My Little Heart Whisbear - the Humming Bear reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›