+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 52
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,603
    Thanks
    126
    Thanked
    267
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by beebs View Post
    bahaha, Pseudo science. There goes father cherry picking the parts of science he "believes" in. So cute, almost like a 5 year old talking about santa.
    I will start another thread about this today to not go off topic. Thanks for reminding me.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    10,012
    Thanks
    14,124
    Thanked
    7,612
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    Oh no, that is ok. You don't have to, if you've seen one Father climate denier post, you've seen them all


    Quote Originally Posted by Father View Post
    I will start another thread about this today to not go off topic. Thanks for reminding me.

  3. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to beebs For This Useful Post:

    Atropos  (16-09-2013),babybabycakes  (17-09-2013),DJ Nette  (17-09-2013),Ellewood  (17-09-2013),JungleMum  (16-09-2013),Renn  (16-09-2013),sockstealingpoltergeist  (16-09-2013),SpecialPatrolGroup  (17-09-2013),~ElectricPink~  (17-09-2013)

  4. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,603
    Thanks
    126
    Thanked
    267
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by beebs View Post
    Oh no, that is ok. You don't have to, if you've seen one Father climate denier post, you've seen them all
    Who 'denies the climate'? That statement alone highlights how much this 'science' has warped the english language. Just like 'carbon' (the solid element) is dangerous to the environment.

    Other thread here:

    http://www.bubhub.com.au/community/f...C-got-it-wrong

  5. #14
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    10,012
    Thanks
    14,124
    Thanked
    7,612
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    You can always spot someone with a flawed argument when they argue semantics. Beep, next question please.

    Quote Originally Posted by Father View Post
    Who 'denies the climate'? That statement alone highlights how much this 'science' has warped the english language. Just like 'carbon' (the solid element) is dangerous to the environment.

    Other thread here:

    http://www.bubhub.com.au/community/f...C-got-it-wrong

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to beebs For This Useful Post:

    Kirst33  (17-09-2013),sockstealingpoltergeist  (16-09-2013)

  7. #15
    Busy-Bee's Avatar
    Busy-Bee is offline Offending people since before Del :D
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    11,211
    Thanks
    3,690
    Thanked
    4,765
    Reviews
    2
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    Past Moderator - Thank you
    Quote Originally Posted by Father View Post
    although I sincerely hope that any 'climate changy' type of pseudo science doesn't receive any more money.
    We agree! I too hope investment is made in main******, credible science - ya know, empirical evidence 'n' all. The stuff that makes planes fly, lights turn on, cures illnesses and builds technology advances. The stuff that 97% of scientists pursue. You never know, with sufficient investment in non-pseudo science Australia may even have it's own space program, like NASA!! How exciting would that be!

  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Busy-Bee For This Useful Post:

    beebs  (16-09-2013),Ellewood  (17-09-2013),Kirst33  (17-09-2013),sockstealingpoltergeist  (16-09-2013)

  9. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    3,494
    Thanks
    1,027
    Thanked
    2,110
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Father View Post
    The article said it.

    Abbott is ******lining the portfolios. That is all. It does not mean that science won't receive any money.... although I sincerely hope that any 'climate changy' type of pseudo science doesn't receive any more money.
    .
    I can't believe there are still people that think all a minister does is allocate money to program's. They make complex decisions that affect the future of our country. Science reaches into almost everyone's life in one way or another, ******lining portfolio's just reduces the ability for robust, considered policy decisions.

  10. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Clementine Grace For This Useful Post:

    Atropos  (16-09-2013),beebs  (16-09-2013),Ellewood  (17-09-2013),FearlessLeader  (16-09-2013),HappyBovinexx  (16-09-2013),Kirst33  (17-09-2013),sockstealingpoltergeist  (16-09-2013)

  11. #17
    Busy-Bee's Avatar
    Busy-Bee is offline Offending people since before Del :D
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    11,211
    Thanks
    3,690
    Thanked
    4,765
    Reviews
    2
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    Past Moderator - Thank you
    Quote Originally Posted by Clementine Grace View Post
    I can't believe there are still people that think all a minister does is allocate money to program's. They make complex decisions that affect the future of our country. Science reaches into almost everyone's life in one way or another, ******lining portfolio's just reduces the ability for robust, considered policy decisions.
    And I'm guessing conflicts of interest.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Busy-Bee For This Useful Post:

    beebs  (16-09-2013),HappyBovinexx  (16-09-2013)

  13. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    3,494
    Thanks
    1,027
    Thanked
    2,110
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Busy-Bee View Post
    And I'm guessing conflicts of interest.
    Absolutely it's all kinds of wrong.

  14. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    8,820
    Thanks
    7,291
    Thanked
    9,740
    Reviews
    5
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Father View Post
    The article said it.



    Abbott is ******lining the portfolios. That is all. It does not mean that science won't receive any money.... although I sincerely hope that any 'climate changy' type of pseudo science doesn't receive any more money.

    Rest assured, the CSIRO won't vanish overnight because there is not a politician in Canberra without the word 'Science' in the title.
    Phew, thanks for explaining it to me. I guess I'll just stop worrying my pretty little head! So a ministerial role that has existed for over 80 years was unnecessary after all! Fancy that!

  15. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Atropos For This Useful Post:

    beebs  (16-09-2013),FiveInTheBed  (16-09-2013),risfaerie  (16-09-2013),snowqu33n  (16-09-2013)

  16. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Haunted House
    Posts
    10,891
    Thanks
    1,538
    Thanked
    1,568
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Atropos View Post
    Phew, thanks for explaining it to me. I guess I'll just stop worrying my pretty little head! So a ministerial role that has existed for over 80 years was unnecessary after all! Fancy that!
    Yup, there's just no need for science schmience, now we have Tony at the helm, he and his magical fairy in the sky will see that everyone's taken care of according to the one true word of his old mate upstairs.

    Its a pity no one can agree on the one true word. I wonder if Jebus mentioned climate change if Tony would be worried . Then again I think there was some stuff about being kind and giving to the poor. Tony has missed a lot of memos.

  17. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sockstealingpoltergeist For This Useful Post:

    Atropos  (16-09-2013),beebs  (16-09-2013),BigRedV  (17-09-2013)


 

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-12-2012, 18:09
  2. Let's talk science!
    By Ana Gram in forum General Chat
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 27-10-2012, 20:11
  3. Petition to the Minister for Health
    By serendipity22 in forum Anti Routine Infant Circumcision
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-10-2012, 20:52

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
TPS Health Physiotherapy and PilatesTPS Health Physiotherapy and Pilates has three clinics located at Morningside, Redlands and Lutwyche. We offer pre and ...
FORUMS - chatting now ...
REVIEWS
"Pigeon teats rule!"
by Alex
Pigeon PP Wide Neck reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›