+ Reply to Thread
Results 41 to 50 of 57
12-08-2013 13:25 #41
12-08-2013 13:30 #42
This is all ridiculous
IMHO, all of Australia should all have the same name for the first year of school and the same cut off.
12-08-2013 13:31 #43Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
Hence Queensland changed their system.
12-08-2013 13:45 #44
It's still not uniform though. They need to do this once the national curriculum is fully implemented.
12-08-2013 14:25 #45Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
I'm in WA, I started Kindergarten the year I turned 5, everyone in our class was born in the same year. There was no part time schooling prior to this, it was straight to 5 days a week 9am-2pm.
12-08-2013 14:45 #46
Ahhhh I think the whole cut off thing is ridiculous. DS missed the cut off by 8 days.
For example his cousin is one month older and will start prep next year an ds will only be in pre prep.
I believe he's well and truly ready but because of the whole cut off thing I have no choice but to wait.
12-08-2013 14:45 #47
Bring back the days where if you turned thAt age that year you started.
12-08-2013 15:09 #48Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
I like the way dd's school does it- born between term 1-start of term 3 you start in term 3 and have 6 terms of reception (that's the first year of school, when most kids will be 5 in SA)
Kids born after the start of term 3 but before term 1 the following year start in the first term and have 4 terms of reception.
My dd is early july so at this school she will do- 4 terms of 3yo kindy (mid year intaake) 4 terms of 4 yo kindy (starting mid year again) and then 6 terms of reception.
eta- to avoid confusion, most schools in SA the child needs to turn 5 on or before April 30th will start in term 1, all kids born after start term 1 the next year. dd's school is private so can have their own dates.
Last edited by F&A; 12-08-2013 at 15:14.
12-08-2013 15:09 #49
It doesn't matter which way you look at it, there is always a cutoff. I'm 29th December meaning I would've been the youngest in my class if it had to be everyone start the year they turn 5.
12-08-2013 15:12 #50
I think they should have just left the cut off in December. At least then all the kids are born in the same year.
DS1 is a November baby so had to start a year later. He's a bright kid who excels academically. There was no gain from delaying his schooling by a year.
DS2 missed the cut off by 4 days and had to start the next year as well. He is mildly autistic and doesn't do well at school. I'm sure thus would be the same regardless of when he started.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using The Bub Hub mobile app
The Following User Says Thank You to HarvestMoon For This Useful Post:
By Emperor in forum General Child Health IssuesReplies: 8Last Post: 14-04-2013, 17:35
By sweetseven in forum Preschools and SchoolsReplies: 19Last Post: 12-04-2013, 14:32
By MrsOhara in forum General Parenting Tips, Advice & ChatReplies: 25Last Post: 17-12-2012, 13:16
Cryosite Family Cord Blood & Tissue BankCryosite has been providing Cord Blood Banking services for over 14 years, and is the trusted choice of Australian ...
LATESTToilet training: when is the best time to start?Why it is OK for your child to be differentWhat is a blessing way? How is it different to a baby shower?
POPULARWhen can I start giving chores to my children?New baby nursery checklist – a guide to newborn essentialsWhat to pack for labour and hospital – a checklist
FORUMS - chatting now ...
Mixed slumber partyGeneral Chat
Married At First Sight 2017Movies / Music / Books / TV Chat
WOW what a shockWorking Hubbers - Employed
Growth Of Intellection. Discussion?General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
IVF babies due Sep/Oct/Nov 2017pregnancy and babies through IVF
Early waking/routine help 17 month oldToddlers (1 year olds)
IUI QueryNon-IVF fertility assistance
Feature film callout to expecting mothers - melbourneMedia Requests