Just released ABS data show Net Overseas Migration in 2012 was 235,000 persons -- a record high level, and representing 60% of Australia's population growth of 1.8%.
While I am generally a supporter of a robust immigration program, there are a couple of reasons to believe these levels are excessive:
- Because economic growth is still subdued, such high immigration is not good for unemployment and has a suppressive effect on real wages.
- Population growth of 1.8% would mean our population would double by 2051 to 46 million, which is 10 million more than even the "Big Australia" that was talked about a few years ago
What do you think?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
22-06-2013 17:49 #1
Record immigration a good thing?
22-06-2013 18:48 #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
Are you concerned about immigration or population? (I ask only because your second point about "Big Australia" is also a question about natural increase, not just immigration.) Anyway, I'm no economist, but I tend to be in support of higher immigration because:
It leads to an increased demand for goods and services, which is helpful for business, employment and the economy.
Many immigrants start their own small businesses - again helpful for Australians, especially if they employ people.
I have some confidence that the Department of Immigration follows government planning and guidelines, which means that the states can manage expansion of infrastructure to accommodate more people.
Australia's cities have the capacity to accept more people. Our cities, have some of the lowest population densities in the world.
Having said all this, I have to admit that I like living in a less populated place and like everyone, I probably have a bit of fear of that changing. But when I think about people wanting to make a new life for themselves in a new country, I am in support of that.
22-06-2013 19:03 #3
22-06-2013 19:28 #4
I too support immigration however do feel it is risky to not have plans in place to accommodate the changing needs of infrastructure so that the growing population can be supported.
When infrastructure doesn't effectively support increased immigration the current population tend to turn on our new residents....at least this was my experience when living in Scotland.
The Following User Says Thank You to giggle berry For This Useful Post:
happy wanderer (25-06-2013)
22-06-2013 19:30 #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
Also, you mentioned that net immigration was 235,000, and on the Department of Immigration website, it says 190,000. Like I said, I'm not an economist, but seems like there might be some confusion in the data.
I guess then that the problem a broader one of disconnected population and infrastructure policy? Perhaps because one is federal and the other largely state controlled. What do you think?
22-06-2013 19:43 #6
The keeper of NOM stats is the ABS, which on Friday released this:
The preliminary estimates of net overseas migration recorded for the year ended 31 December 2012 (235,900 people) was 17.0%, or 34,400 people, higher than the net overseas migration recorded for the year ended 31 December 2011 (201,600 people).
Innovations Sports PhysiotherapyWomen’s Health Physios who are able to assess and treat a wide range of Pregnancy and Post Natal Issues. We offer ...
LATESTWhat is a blessing way? How is it different to a baby shower?7 ways to break the ‘mumnotony’ at homeGuide to government family benefit payments
POPULARWhen can I start giving chores to my children?New baby nursery checklist – a guide to newborn essentialsWhat to pack for labour and hospital – a checklist
FORUMS - chatting now ...
IVF babies due Sep/Oct/Nov 2017pregnancy and babies through IVF
"loose" vagina after birth, how to fix? [TMI]Pregnancy & Birth General Chat
Miracle March TTC and Testing ChatConception & Fertility General Chat
This vs thatChoosing Baby Names
How long would you leave your 8 (almost 9) year old at home alone?General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat