+ Reply to Thread
Page 30 of 44 FirstFirst ... 20282930313240 ... LastLast
Results 291 to 300 of 438
  1. #291
    Mod-pegasus's Avatar
    Mod-pegasus is offline ADMINISTRATOR
    and all that the Lorax left here in this mess was a small pile of rocks with the one word...UNLESS
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    14,645
    Thanks
    1,735
    Thanked
    1,735
    Reviews
    2
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    How interesting it is to see the way that its seen as ok to liken a male politician to a green ogre and comment on his weight, whereas in other threads I've seen condemnation of media doing the equivalent to the prime minister.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mod-pegasus For This Useful Post:

    Busy-Bee  (05-02-2013),MINIRoo  (06-02-2013)

  3. #292
    lambjam's Avatar
    lambjam is offline Nitwit! Blubber! Oddment! Tweak!
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    7,177
    Thanks
    2,062
    Thanked
    4,956
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts

    Default Abbott to axe school bonus if he gets in

    I can't think of an Australian politician that has escaped caricature. Male, female, overweight, underweight, attractive, unattractive. Comes with the territory

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to lambjam For This Useful Post:

    Clementine Grace  (05-02-2013),mama and her little bearxxx  (05-02-2013)

  5. #293
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    South East QLD
    Posts
    4,033
    Thanks
    3,349
    Thanked
    1,623
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts

    Default Re: Abbott to axe school bonus if he gets in

    Quote Originally Posted by pegasus View Post
    How interesting it is to see the way that its seen as ok to liken a male politician to a green ogre and comment on his weight, whereas in other threads I've seen condemnation of media doing the equivalent to the prime minister.
    Ah, but I was commenting on his weight loss and saying it's good. Is it not ok to say positive things about weight loss?

    IMO, if there was a female pollie who looked like Shrek my comment would be the same.

    Sent from my GT540 using BubHub

  6. #294
    lambjam's Avatar
    lambjam is offline Nitwit! Blubber! Oddment! Tweak!
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    7,177
    Thanks
    2,062
    Thanked
    4,956
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts

    Default Abbott to axe school bonus if he gets in

    Quote Originally Posted by delirium View Post
    Either way the govt is spending money to help families with school. Be it to businesses or more funding for excusions/uniforms etc. So why not give it to families so they can get the best deal?
    For the same reason we don't tax people more and distribute the proceeds for other people to spend on their gardens. Or haircare. Or art. Because it makes better sense to not tax them in the first place but rather let them use that money as they choose.

    If it's a necessary part of the curriculum (books, pencils, excursions) it should be covered by the school, and if the schools can't afford that then they should be given enough to do so.

    But redistributing taxed income so people can buy polos and runners? What happened to personal accountability? If someone can't afford to buy their children clothing then there are charities to assist them, but such situations shouldn't be treated as the norm.

  7. #295
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    23,244
    Thanks
    6,365
    Thanked
    17,643
    Reviews
    10
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    Awards:
    Bubhub Blogger - Thanks100 Posts in a week
    But if you wanting schools to provide everything necessary education wise and people are left to buy uniforms etc, then they are not going to give tax cuts. I would say it would either be a choice of tax cuts with the same, if not less that the school covers, or more spending and no tax cuts.

    The other issue I think is that using tax cuts as a way of making schooling more affordable, is that the wealthy, who should def be the ones that should have financial accountability are the ones getting help while the ones that most need it get little to nothing.

  8. #296
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    3,496
    Thanks
    1,027
    Thanked
    2,112
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts

    Default Abbott to axe school bonus if he gets in

    Quote Originally Posted by pegasus View Post
    How interesting it is to see the way that its seen as ok to liken a male politician to a green ogre and comment on his weight, whereas in other threads I've seen condemnation of media doing the equivalent to the prime minister.
    It was Paul Keating who did it as a joke on radio and it stuck. It's a labor party joke.

    I would comment further on real life experiences but not on a public forum. It's not because of his weight.

  9. #297
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    The Kimberley WA
    Posts
    4,665
    Thanks
    920
    Thanked
    1,192
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MsTruth View Post
    I don't know what I truly think about the education payment and the potential axing of it. I do agree that if it is axed it will be replaced with some other payment or a return to being able to claim it at tax time.

    I understand the principle behind it being for lower income families but I wonder whether we as a society are getting caught in the trap of holding people down by keeping them trapped in the welfare cycle rather than giving them a hand up out of it.

    I also find myself getting slightly annoyed at the fact that we are missing out again on a rebate/bonus/payment - even though technically we do not need them and would not even notice them going into our account to be honest.

    This feeling does not sit well with me though as my political leanings have always been towards the ALP and what it has traditionally stood for.

    As a couple of others have mentioned as a household we would be much better off until the Libs but I just cannot bring myself to put them any higher then last on the ballot paper (regardless of who the leader or the local candidate is).

    So, as my post demonstrates I am suddenly finding myself in the position of being one of the confused voters.
    I think what you have said in the second and third paragraph has hit the nail on the head.

  10. #298
    lambjam's Avatar
    lambjam is offline Nitwit! Blubber! Oddment! Tweak!
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    7,177
    Thanks
    2,062
    Thanked
    4,956
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by delirium View Post
    But if you wanting schools to provide everything necessary education wise and people are left to buy uniforms etc, then they are not going to give tax cuts. I would say it would either be a choice of tax cuts with the same, if not less that the school covers, or more spending and no tax cuts.

    The other issue I think is that using tax cuts as a way of making schooling more affordable, is that the wealthy, who should def be the ones that should have financial accountability are the ones getting help while the ones that most need it get little to nothing.
    I'm not suggesting tax cuts; I'm all for high taxes that go towards necessary public goods and services. But I am opposed to middle class welfare which, as I see it, is simply the government meddling in how, when and where we spend our money, usually for little reason more than vote collecting. Not great economic policy.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to lambjam For This Useful Post:

    BlissedOut  (05-02-2013)

  12. #299
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    The Kimberley WA
    Posts
    4,665
    Thanks
    920
    Thanked
    1,192
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by delirium View Post
    Not that I don't support that, I do. But clearly this isn't about saving the country money. It's about redirecting to middle and high income earners (given 2 people working are going to be more likely to be middle to high than low).

    Under the argument you know what kids cost, prepare for it, shouldn't those on PPL plan ahead instead of having the tax payer fund them?? and again I support PPL all the way, I'm just pointing out the inconsistencies here. It seems this isn't about saving tax payers, but wanting the money to go to the rich and not the poor.
    But those that do work should have an incentive to be able to have time at home with their children by being paid the ppl. I have been with my employer for 12 years so i think i deserve to be paid a bit of money being the ppl from the government to enable me to have time off, I have paid 12yrs of taxes so why shouldn't I get something back!

    And while we all know what kids cost the point you raise to plan ahead, well that applies to everyone, low, middle or high income earners but it just seems to me that a majority of the handouts paid to lower income earners and the more they get the less incentive there is for them to better their situation by getting a job or a higher paying one etc, why would one remove themselves from the welfare system when receiving school bonuses, ccr, ccb, tax a and b payments, rent assistance, health care card and the list goes on.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Blessedwith3boys For This Useful Post:

    MummaOJ  (05-02-2013)

  14. #300
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    23,244
    Thanks
    6,365
    Thanked
    17,643
    Reviews
    10
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    Awards:
    Bubhub Blogger - Thanks100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by lambjam View Post
    I'm not suggesting tax cuts; I'm all for high taxes that go towards necessary public goods and services. But I am opposed to middle class welfare which, as I see it, is simply the government meddling in how, when and where we spend our money, usually for little reason more than vote collecting. Not great economic policy.
    Ah I see. Well then I agree. I would support higher taxes and everything for free, much like the Sweden and Denmark.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to delirium For This Useful Post:

    BlissedOut  (05-02-2013)


 

Similar Threads

  1. School kids bonus
    By kgh09 in forum Family Finances
    Replies: 174
    Last Post: 17-01-2013, 11:24
  2. School Kids Bonus - When do we get it?
    By Ready To Run in forum Family Finances
    Replies: 90
    Last Post: 28-06-2012, 16:33
  3. School kid bonus Qu
    By LoveLivesHere in forum Family Finances
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 26-06-2012, 12:12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
Pea Pods Reusable NappiesPea Pods are the smart choice when it comes to choosing what's best for you, your baby and the environment. Affordable ...
FORUMS - chatting now ...
Emilia vs EmeliaChoosing Baby Names
LTTTC terrified to testConception & Fertility General Chat
Help with BBT chartConception & Fertility General Chat
❤Joyous June/July TTC!❤Conception & Fertility General Chat
Very Very Early Signs!Conception & Fertility General Chat
Preparing for a NICU babyPregnancy & Birth General Chat
REVIEWS
"Made bed time less anxious"
by Meld85
My Little Heart Whisbear - the Humming Bear reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›