+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    691
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked
    104
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts

    Default Stage 2 formula

    My DD is 6 months three weeks old and is currently on Karicare Aptamil Gold Stage 1 formula.

    She also has silent reflux which seems to be getting worse lately.

    Im wondering if going to the stage 2 formula which is from 6 months would make a difference.

    What actually is the difference in the two stages? Does it take long for babies to get used to it?

    TIA


  2. #2
    MrJones&Me's Avatar
    MrJones&Me is offline sometimes as useless as the 'ueue' in queue
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    4,613
    Thanks
    1,993
    Thanked
    1,370
    Reviews
    22
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Subscribing as I am curious myself. I know DD was constipated on step 1 I Bellamy's, then had trouble pooing on step 2. I've switched to s26 now and it seems she has diarrhoea! Can't win!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    3,288
    Thanks
    221
    Thanked
    1,105
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    When I switched DS from stage 1 s26 to stage 2 it didn't suit him, it Made him vomit and have runny poos. I checked with the MHCN first if it was ok to go back to stage 1 and she said yes. If I were you I'd stick to what they are happy with, I don't think there's much difference nutrition wise I just think the stage two fills them up a bit more and I suspect that's why some babies have trouble digesting it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    691
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked
    104
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Hmmm, if it fills them up more, it might be better for DD because she's not on an anti-reflux formula as we worry that will constipate her too much, but she's becoming really hard to burp lately and I'm wondering if it's because the milk just isn't thick enough.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    8,371
    Thanks
    777
    Thanked
    816
    Reviews
    5
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Hi, I'm considering changing from stage 1/HA to stage 2 as DS is almost 8m and no longer needing HA.

    How do you know stage 2 is more filling?
    Last edited by 2BlueBirds; 02-10-2012 at 10:28.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Brisbane North
    Posts
    4,459
    Thanks
    1,581
    Thanked
    1,803
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    I had my dd on Nan Pro Gold 1 and when i put her on the stage two she refused.. and i was told it was completely ok to keep her on the stage 1. i had no probs with her at all.


 

Similar Threads

  1. Looking for a new "Stage 3" formula - suggestion please :)
    By perthmumm in forum Bottlefeeding Support
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-12-2012, 20:00
  2. Please tell me this is a 'stage'!
    By emz1082 in forum General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-09-2012, 06:31
  3. Is it neccessary to go from stage 1 formula to stage 2?
    By One of THOSE mums! in forum Bottlefeeding Support
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 24-01-2012, 08:21

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
Innovations Sports PhysiotherapyWomen’s Health Physios who are able to assess and treat a wide range of Pregnancy and Post Natal Issues. We offer ...
REVIEWS
"Made bed time less anxious"
by Meld85
My Little Heart Whisbear - the Humming Bear reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›