+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    535
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked
    109
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts

    Default Natural vs cesarean birth?

    Need some factual info - why is natural better for me and the baby?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Melbourne VIC
    Posts
    303
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    34
    Reviews
    0
    As far as I know there is higher incidence of asthma and respiratory problems with bubs born via c section but it doesn't mean they will have these problems it's just That stats are higher for them. My sister and I were born via c section and have never had any problems like that but a higher amount of babies born that way do if that makes sense.

    Also goes with that they are more likely to need help breathing ie their airways cleared when they're born as they may have more mucus still present than a baby born via vaginal birth when squeezing them out helps with removing that from their airways.

    Typically less risk of hemorrhage and less risk to do with anesthetic obviously. Most likely quicker recovery than a c section though not in some cases I guess it depends on if you have complications or not

    I'll shut up now cos you know I've researched this

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    518
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked
    90
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Peaze View Post
    Need some factual info - why is natural better for me and the baby?
    This thread is gonna get messy lol.....

  4. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Hunkamunka For This Useful Post:

    beebs  (09-08-2012),Bonkers  (09-08-2012),Buttoneska  (09-08-2012),PomPoms  (09-08-2012)

  5. #4
    Bonkers is offline wishes she was a glow worm. A glow worm's never glum, 'cos how can you be grumpy when the sun shines out of your bum?
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Under Your Bed
    Posts
    2,864
    Thanks
    2,361
    Thanked
    429
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    I was born nat and I have asthma. Both my kids were born by csection and so far they have had no medical reaction to being born that way. I had no choice with my first and 2nd was a personal choice. I had good experiences with both mine and I'm glad I had my children that way

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    389
    Thanks
    57
    Thanked
    79
    Reviews
    0
    Subscribing, just in case I will require a section (find out next week )

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    The Kimberley WA
    Posts
    4,665
    Thanks
    920
    Thanked
    1,192
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Can tell this thread will get heated but anyway....

    My concerns as to why I did not want a cs and I believe natural is best unless recommended by your dr are;
    -I want to be able to hold my bub straight away not have a quick look then get bubs back after Dr has finished his surgery
    -cs is major surgery and apart from the lengthy recovery time, a lot of people I have spoken to have had trouble with tummy muscles for a long time or indefinately after wards
    -There is often bonding issues with bub after a cs
    -I didnt need a cs even after a long labour the first time, i was determined to birth naturally unless my ob recommended I have one I wouldn't opt to have one

    I had 2 natural births, the first being a long intense labour ending in failed suctionx2 then forcep delivery after 33 hrs of labour, I also had an episiotomy with discomfort for only up to a week after, I healed very well, all back to normal.
    Even following that I was not opting for a cs with my second delivery. I had quick 4hr labour second time round Both times I was able to hold bubs right away in which was important to me!

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Melbourne VIC
    Posts
    303
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    34
    Reviews
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Hunkamunka View Post
    This thread is gonna get messy lol.....
    Dont see why it would get messy, im pro choice for either birth option and support what any mums decision is, we're just discussing each method the pros and cons, risks to both etc

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,279
    Thanks
    2,361
    Thanked
    2,023
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Kimberleygal1 View Post
    Can tell this thread will get heated but anyway....

    My concerns as to why I did not want a cs and I believe natural is best unless recommended by your dr are;
    -I want to be able to hold my bub straight away not have a quick look then get bubs back after Dr has finished his surgery
    -cs is major surgery and apart from the lengthy recovery time, a lot of people I have spoken to have had trouble with tummy muscles for a long time or indefinately after wards
    -There is often bonding issues with bub after a cs
    -I didnt need a cs even after a long labour the first time, i was determined to birth naturally unless my ob recommended I have one I wouldn't opt to have one
    My reasoning for wanting a vaginal birth was similar, and resulted in a vacuum delivery, however the recovery was quick, my milk came in quick and I was generally happy.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Luna Lovegood For This Useful Post:

    Blessedwith3boys  (09-08-2012)

  11. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,279
    Thanks
    2,361
    Thanked
    2,023
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    FWIW, while c-section are brilliant in the sense that they can save both the baby and mothers lives and they have their place in obstetrics, I don't think they will ever be a perfect substitute for a vaginal delivery.

    Vagina is natural and optimum way to have a baby, because that is how women and babies are built. Of course there are variables- physical and mental illnesses, but generally it is optimum.
    Last edited by Luna Lovegood; 10-08-2012 at 12:25.

  12. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Luna Lovegood For This Useful Post:

    Blessedwith3boys  (09-08-2012),Gandalf  (09-08-2012),headoverfeet  (10-08-2012),missie_mackxxxx  (09-08-2012),sweetsugardumplin'  (09-08-2012),wannawannabe  (09-08-2012)

  13. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    3,786
    Thanks
    1,216
    Thanked
    2,134
    Reviews
    15
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Before I reply, are you looking to hear the pro's of both, or just natural?

    I had an extremely positive c-section story if you're interested. But your OP seems like you're more after positives of natural birth


 

Similar Threads

  1. Sex after natural birth, TMI!
    By maddisongirl in forum Postnatal & General Women's Health Chat
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 12-06-2012, 16:23
  2. Natural vs Cesarean
    By Doritos in forum Birth & Labour Questions
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 29-05-2012, 14:45

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
Innovations Sports PhysiotherapyWomen’s Health Physios who are able to assess and treat a wide range of Pregnancy and Post Natal Issues. We offer ...
FORUMS - chatting now ...
REVIEWS
"Made bed time less anxious"
by Meld85
My Little Heart Whisbear - the Humming Bear reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›