+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 48 of 48
  1. #41
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Launceston
    Posts
    13,466
    Thanks
    732
    Thanked
    2,355
    Reviews
    34
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    No! I don't agree with the slaughter of animals. They are just doing what's in their nature.

    I think it's repulsive that the answer is to murder them

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to waterlily For This Useful Post:

    Bonkers  (20-07-2012)

  3. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    3,115
    Thanks
    748
    Thanked
    458
    Reviews
    2
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    They were there first... Leave them be...

    *most* attacks by Great Whites at least are testing bites.... Whites tend to not like the taste of human...
    Tiger & Bulls are a different story.
    Last edited by Chocolate All Gone Now; 20-07-2012 at 08:50.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Chocolate All Gone Now For This Useful Post:

    Bonkers  (20-07-2012)

  5. #43
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    703
    Thanks
    358
    Thanked
    285
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ToughLove View Post
    Uhhh...yes...that's kindof the point of BSL laws.

    In Victoria at least, if the ranger decides your dog looks {not acts, they don't need proof} like it might be dangerous one day, they can legally go onto your property without your permission, seize and destroy your family dog.

    The point is to destroy all dogs of a particular size, colour or shape regardless of whether they present a danger to society or not.

    That's no more fair, just or logical than killing all sharks based on the actions of one.
    That's awful!!

  6. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    8,794
    Thanks
    3,395
    Thanked
    3,081
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ToughLove View Post
    Uhhh...yes...that's kindof the point of BSL laws.

    In Victoria at least, if the ranger decides your dog looks {not acts, they don't need proof} like it might be dangerous one day, they can legally go onto your property without your permission, seize and destroy your family dog.

    The point is to destroy all dogs of a particular size, colour or shape regardless of whether they present a danger to society or not.

    That's no more fair, just or logical than killing all sharks based on the actions of one.
    Looks like Qld has similar coming in. I hope not.

  7. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Qld
    Posts
    26,930
    Thanks
    2,736
    Thanked
    6,744
    Reviews
    2
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    No way.

    I don't want to get hurt by various ocean-dwelling creatures, so I rarely venture into the sea. It's THEIR domain. It's like entering a bear's cave and then b*tching that you got attacked. How about if you don't want to get attacked, you stay out of the ocean... or just accept there's a risk of it happening, though minimal, when you enter the ocean and suck it up?

    I think slaughtering animals because WE think WE deserve to have a dip in the ocean is so arrogant.

  8. #46
    ToughLove's Avatar
    ToughLove is offline Meaner than a junkyard dog
    Winner 2012 - Funniest Member
    Winner 2012 - Funniest Thread
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    996
    Thanks
    121
    Thanked
    1,284
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by share a book View Post
    Looks like Qld has similar coming in. I hope not.
    They're actually doing worse; there was a discussion at the MDBA this year where a representative was putting forward the idea that since banning certain breeds hasn't worked {wonder why? It's such a perfect plan }; instead they'll ban anything over 25kg.
    This is so if a child is bitten, they have a higher chance of surviving.

    All dogs that will be over the weight limit at their adult weight will have to keep to restricted breed limitations- they will have to be a concrete floored pen 24/7, unless they're being taken to the vet. In that case, they will have to be muzzled and wear a dangerous dog collar, and only be around people over 18 years of age.
    No time out of the pen at all, not even walks, playing, training or even being allowed inside with their family on a cold night.

    Can you even imagine the mental damage that would do to an 8 week old puppy?

    Thankfully it's been shot down, but I hope they don't keep trying in the next few years.

    I have no idea how politicians come up with this kind of rubbish; like shark slaughters. It makes no logical sense whatsoever.

  9. #47
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    4
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0
    Reviews
    0
    No they shouldn't. It's their home and they are just doing what they are supossed to. Eat whats in their home to eat...

  10. #48
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,719
    Thanks
    1,042
    Thanked
    396
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    We are in their territory. Whatever happens we have to suck it up. Or not go in the water.....

    Sent from my GT-I9100T using BubHub


 

Similar Threads

  1. SHARK MENACE: Licence to kill sharks close to swim beaches
    By headoverfeet in forum Social Issues
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 30-09-2012, 20:38

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
Heinz Baby BasicsOur BPA Free range offers you a choice for every stage of your baby’s feeding development. You’ll love our ...
REVIEWS
"Pigeon teats rule!"
by Alex
Pigeon PP Wide Neck reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›