+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    9,728
    Thanks
    1,547
    Thanked
    6,568
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Disgusting. Actually makes me rather ashamed.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to SheWarrior For This Useful Post:

    Lumpy Melon (22-06-2012)

  3. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,109
    Thanks
    92
    Thanked
    764
    Reviews
    5
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    And apparently religion and politics have nothing to do with each other in this country....pffft

    All Campbell Newman has done is appease religious groups from the second he got in

  4. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to KnockKnockPenny For This Useful Post:

    CaptainJaneway (22-06-2012),Lumpy Melon (22-06-2012),Myztik (22-06-2012),Zombie_eyes (22-06-2012)

  5. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    749
    Thanks
    836
    Thanked
    252
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    I'm going to go against the grain and say I can see the merits for a de facto couple waiting two years but as for single sex couples and same sex couples being banned that is preposterous!!! What century are we in????

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Carpe diem 2013 For This Useful Post:

    Lumpy Melon (22-06-2012)

  7. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    19,599
    Thanks
    3,252
    Thanked
    4,046
    Reviews
    8
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    can i clarify - so say I wanted to be a surrogate for a same sex couple I couldn't? (totally in theory - I think surrogates are amazing but I couldn't do it)

    Sent from my GT-I9300 using BubHub

  8. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    13,063
    Thanks
    9,840
    Thanked
    12,960
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Bleepin religious old farts!

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to VicPark For This Useful Post:

    Lumpy Melon (22-06-2012)

  10. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    3,665
    Thanks
    1,425
    Thanked
    1,432
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by scotmum2be View Post
    I'm going to go against the grain and say I can see the merits for a de facto couple waiting two years but as for single sex couples and same sex couples being banned that is preposterous!!! What century are we in????
    Genuine question - can I ask why you would be against a defacto couple with less than 2 years together, but would be ok with a single person with no partner at all?

  11. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,680
    Thanks
    794
    Thanked
    1,230
    Reviews
    3
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Boobycino: No you wouldn't be 'allowed' to

  12. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    98
    Thanks
    41
    Thanked
    22
    Reviews
    0
    I heard this today and felt appalled and ashamed! I can't believe in the year 2012 in a country that prides itself on diversity; narrow, small minded people still make all the rules!

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to haylithan For This Useful Post:

    Lumpy Melon (22-06-2012)

  14. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    749
    Thanks
    836
    Thanked
    252
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Pesca77 View Post
    Genuine question - can I ask why you would be against a defacto couple with less than 2 years together, but would be ok with a single person with no partner at all?
    fair point. Probably from a stability perspective - you don't want an important person coming and going from a child's life. But as I suppose this could happen with a single person dating it prob invalidates my original thought.

  15. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    19,599
    Thanks
    3,252
    Thanked
    4,046
    Reviews
    8
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Lumpy Melon View Post
    Boobycino: No you wouldn't be 'allowed' to
    ... but... so... how could they stop that?

    If someone wants to be a surrogate - privately arranged. Via ivf or however - births baby and then nominates the couple to legally adopt the baby...? which stage does the government step in and say "ahem you can't do that?"

    Sent from my GT-I9300 using BubHub


 

Similar Threads

  1. Surrogacy
    By Raphael in forum Adoption / Surrogacy
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-03-2018, 22:31
  2. IUI for surrogacy?
    By richo22 in forum iui / iudi
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 17-10-2012, 11:48
  3. changes to same-sex surrogacy in Qld
    By OJandMe in forum News & Current Affairs
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 24-06-2012, 11:08

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

FEATURED SUPPORTER
Prams and StrollersLooking to buy a pram or stroller? :: Viewer reviews of prams :: Pram Buyers ...
FORUMS - chatting now ...
Two lines?Pregnancy Tests & Help / Support with Results
Tongue thrust reflex?Weaning & Starting solids
Postnatal anxietyPostnatal & General Women's Health Chat
Sensational September 2020 TTCConception & Fertility General Chat

ADVERTISEMENT