Im definitely way to emotionally biased! I would be a terrible defense lawyer for anyone convicted of violence against another or hurting another in sone form. It would play on my mind if they did it and I would probably not represent them very well at all! But thats why Im not a lawyer I take my hat off to any who can/could though
Sent from my GT-I9000 using BubHub
+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 40 of 45
07-06-2012 19:22 #31
07-06-2012 19:40 #32
Guilt is determined in court. Even if the facts are not in dispute, a person has - and SHOULD have - the right to affirmative defences and representation on sentencing.
Until a person has had the charge tested in court, they all have "allegedly" committed the crime. That even the most obviously guilty have the right to competent representation doesn't protect them, it protects all of us.
That even the obviously guilty have to the right to avail themselves of every facet of the court process is the sole reason why Lindy Chamberlain's surviving kids didn't grow to adulthood visiting their mother in prison. That alone makes the job worthwhile.
07-06-2012 19:45 #33
Courts don't always get it right.
Normally a client tells their lawyer if they've committed the crime. That's what I'm talking about, not whether or not you can stand up in court make everyone think they're innocent when they're not.
The Following User Says Thank You to BigRedV For This Useful Post:
07-06-2012 19:58 #34
I couldn't personally but have nothing against those who do.
07-06-2012 20:28 #35
No, but only because court work doesn't interest me. Currently in the family law area which I thought I'd never do (well, on leave from this work) but when I go back to work next year I want to do something different.
07-06-2012 21:15 #36Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
it's not in their interests to confess anything to their lawyer, as from my hazy memory of legal ethics, once a client admits they are guilty, all you can do is test the prosecution's case, but you can't put forward another defence.
The Following User Says Thank You to MsMummy For This Useful Post:
07-06-2012 21:27 #37Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
Once a client has admitted guilt I don't think there is any continuing obligation to put forward a defence?
If you feel there has been an abuse of process you are free to pursue that but there is no requirement to do so.
It's been a long time but my recollection is that there is a convention preventing criminal barristers from being sued for presenting less than convincing defence cases when they believe their client is guilty.
It's the 'out' for the cab rank rule.
07-06-2012 21:42 #38
All this lawyer talk is hawt *blush*
07-06-2012 21:44 #39
I think I could with little things but murder or sexual assault or pedophilia no
07-06-2012 22:22 #40
It is worth noting that the vast majority of criminal cases do actually resolve as guilty pleas in any case.
I personally find criminal law one of the least morally conflicting areas of the law to practice in. In saying that, it can of course be distressing at times to be confronted with the hideous things that people can do to each other.
Melbourne Natural Medicine ClinicLeading natural health practitioners in fertility, preconception, pregnancy, and children's health. We take an ...
FORUMS - chatting now ...
Would you help your kids with?General Chat
Local Infant Adoption in VictoriaAdoption / Surrogacy
IVF Babies due Sep/Oct/Nov 2017 #2pregnancy and babies through IVF
The Not So Serious Vent Thread #7General Chat
IVF/FET April & May chatConception & Fertility General Chat
Is the name Evie really that popular? (Particularly in NSW)Choosing Baby Names