+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 71
  1. #41
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    14,057
    Thanks
    1,875
    Thanked
    2,608
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Thermolicious View Post
    Probably testing for whatever is in your urine for diabetes??
    I still don't agree with that

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,700
    Thanks
    358
    Thanked
    503
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Bell & Bug View Post
    I still don't agree with that
    Why?

    The main purpose of this mandatory test is a result of the discovery that alot of low / no income children enter school with undetected medical problems (hearing and sight specifically)

    If a child has problems when learning the early building blocks of main****** education they often fall behind for a long time after,

    The main concern is SOME of the childrens parents dont notice the problems and dont get the problems assessed by a gp.

    The govt realises that the 'threat' of loosing money nay be enough to sway the parents who do not bother and thus lower the chancebof undetected medical problems going undetected while a child is trying to learn

    Sent from my MB526 using BubHub

  3. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GuestMember For This Useful Post:

    PurpleButterfly4  (01-06-2012),tea&toast  (01-06-2012),trishalishous  (01-06-2012)

  4. #43
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    14,057
    Thanks
    1,875
    Thanked
    2,608
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    For one I was told by a nurse that it was purely for statistics.
    I don't see the point in testing a child's urine for no reason. Yes if they suspected an illness or issue, but just because? I think that's unnecessary and invasive and a waste of money and resources.

  5. #44
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    21,860
    Thanks
    15,254
    Thanked
    11,459
    Reviews
    14
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the WeekBusiest Member of the Week - week ended 5/2/14Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 31/10/14Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 24/10/14Busiest Member of the Week
    There was NO urine test when we did 2 weeks ago. I would think that they suspected something. I can think of a few things that it maybe for based on the questions we were asked.

  6. #45
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,080
    Thanks
    119
    Thanked
    474
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    I work in this field and it's definitely not done for "statistics" (whatever the heck that means)!! All information is confidential and not submitted to public health. As a PP said it's to pick up health problems including vision troubles, hearing difficulties, learning difficulties, physical issues such as weight problems etc. before the child starts school. The urine test is not standard but may be done by a practice if they have particular concerns about a child.

    In QLD it is also linked with the 3.5-4 year vaccination and you will get the second part of the maternity immunisation allowance.

    It's a great and valuable service and I can't imagine a single valid reason not to do it!

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Piffle For This Useful Post:

    smallpotatoes  (01-06-2012),tea&toast  (01-06-2012)

  8. #46
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,130
    Thanks
    5,115
    Thanked
    1,220
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    If they are going to do these checks, they should be for ALL four year olds. Not just those under certain income limits.

  9. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Stiflers Mom For This Useful Post:

    CMF  (01-06-2012),FearlessLeader  (02-06-2012),Ffrenchknickers  (01-06-2012),TinyLittleTootsies  (01-06-2012)

  10. #47
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,033
    Thanks
    325
    Thanked
    464
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    so we dont recieve any cl at all does that mean dd cant be tested??.what if she does have issues?

    Sent from my GT-I9100T using BubHub

  11. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Qld
    Posts
    26,930
    Thanks
    2,736
    Thanked
    6,744
    Reviews
    2
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    I agree with Stiflers Mum... ALL kids should be checked if they're going to make it essential. I guess there's no way to police that though, and it'd be costly to go and check up on parents who didn't do it... so saying, "Well take your money if you don't," is probably the easiest way to go about it for now... most people will go just for fear of that happening if they don't.

    This wasn't around when DD was 4 though... but generally most kids will get their needles at that age anyway... so hopefully kids are getting a quick once-over at least.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to SassyMummy For This Useful Post:

    TinyLittleTootsies  (01-06-2012)

  13. #49
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    14,057
    Thanks
    1,875
    Thanked
    2,608
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Stiflers Mom View Post
    If they are going to do these checks, they should be for ALL four year olds. Not just those under certain income limits.
    I agree, and integrated into the enrollment process of schools.

    Not sure what the nurse I spoke to is on about then, coz she said to was to get overall statistics. Of course it will help those who need it, I doubt doctors would overlook any issues found during the check, but I don't really see the benefit to it. I just said I wasn't doing it and there were no questions asked and clearly centrelink won't be following it up me coz I'm not in the 'affected group'. I just don't see it working the way they would like for it to.

  14. #50
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,080
    Thanks
    119
    Thanked
    474
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    These checks ARE for all kids. :s The vast majority of practices will bulk bill for it. But the withholding of benefits only applies to those who are eligible for benefits in the first place. It's just another strategy to try and motivate families to do it.

    We don't qualify for the payments but I sure as heck am getting my son's development, growth, hearing and vision checked before he goes to school.

  15. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Piffle For This Useful Post:

    tea&toast  (01-06-2012),trishalishous  (01-06-2012)


 
+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 6 weeks post partum check for mums, what do they check?
    By del79 in forum Pregnancy & Birth General Chat
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-12-2012, 16:06
  2. ~pre-primary health check~
    By Huni&Coco in forum Preschools and Schools
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 19-06-2012, 19:51
  3. 3 1/2 yr maternal health check (Vic)
    By 2girls1boyplus1 in forum General Child Health Issues
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 24-04-2012, 06:35

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
Maternity ClothesLooking to buy maternity clothes? :: Check the bubhub directory of local & online maternity clothes shops :: Find ...
FORUMS - chatting now ...
Implantation sickness?Conception & Fertility General Chat
Trying from monthsNon-IVF fertility assistance
Married At First Sight 2017Movies / Music / Books / TV Chat
IVF babies due March/April/May 2017#2pregnancy and babies through IVF
@Nattie84General Chat
April/May TTC group chatConception & Fertility General Chat
REVIEWS
"Pigeon teats rule!"
by Alex
Pigeon PP Wide Neck reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›