+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 21 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 203
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    3,666
    Thanks
    1,426
    Thanked
    1,432
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts

    Default $ex injury compo claim

    http://www.news.com.au/business/work...-1226333292525

    What are your thoughts??!

    Personally I think it's ridiculous that she 1) even thought she had a case and was happy for this to be made public and 2) our system actually agrees that this would be considered a work compo claim!!

    I would have thought at best she could try and sue the motel....but then her 'friend' has admitted they may have damaged it themselves anyway because they were 'going hard'....WTF??! Lmao.....

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    8,794
    Thanks
    3,395
    Thanked
    3,081
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Laugh if you like, but this was a workplace injury and she suffered from it.

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to share a book For This Useful Post:

    giggle berry  (20-04-2012),missie_mackxxxx  (21-04-2012)

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    3,325
    Thanks
    46
    Thanked
    997
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    When I first saw this I thought she was a sex worker and thought fair enough. Then I read the article. What a joke!! People who have genuine claims are getting rejected and she's winning! Dodgy :/

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to happygirl1982 For This Useful Post:

    Boobycino  (20-04-2012)

  6. #4
    lambjam's Avatar
    lambjam is offline Nitwit! Blubber! Oddment! Tweak!
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    7,177
    Thanks
    2,062
    Thanked
    4,956
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    I have no problem with it at all. As the judge said, had she injured herself playing cards in her room it would be considered a work related injury; how is this any different?

    Had she not been travelling for work, she wouldn't have been in the room and wouldn't have sustained the injury. It might be a little more unusual than the average workers' compensation case, but the logic remains the same.

  7. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to lambjam For This Useful Post:

    Ana Gram  (20-04-2012),BbBbBh  (20-04-2012),Benji  (20-04-2012),chameleon  (22-04-2012),giggle berry  (20-04-2012),Gothel  (20-04-2012),LoveHeart  (20-04-2012),Maybelline  (20-04-2012),missie_mackxxxx  (21-04-2012),Mod-biscotti  (20-04-2012),nelle7250  (20-04-2012),Pawzette  (20-04-2012),share a book  (20-04-2012),shelle65  (20-04-2012),Witwicky  (20-04-2012)

  8. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    10,611
    Thanks
    404
    Thanked
    1,918
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    I would think that workcover will seek to recover against the motel, as light fittings shouldn't fall off.

    Workcover claims are pretty broad, and include travelling to work. She was only in the motel due to work commitments, and sex can be a normal element of staying in a motel. As they said, if she was playing cards in the motel, she would be covered, so why not sex.

    I feel sorry for her. Even though there's a suppression order for her name, her colleagues would know, she's had to recount intimate details to her lawyers and the court.

  9. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to MsMummy For This Useful Post:

    FiveInTheBed  (20-04-2012),giggle berry  (20-04-2012),Mod-biscotti  (20-04-2012),share a book  (20-04-2012),The Fox  (20-04-2012)

  10. #6
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,798
    Thanks
    1,042
    Thanked
    2,261
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Love it. The best bit was "at the time going hard"..hahaha.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Janesmum123 For This Useful Post:

    LoveHeart  (20-04-2012)

  12. #7
    Mod-biscotti's Avatar
    Mod-biscotti is offline Administrator Administrator
    Winner 2012 - Naughtiest/Cheekiest Mod
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    16,313
    Thanks
    1,719
    Thanked
    3,753
    Reviews
    3
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Pesca77 View Post
    http://www.news.com.au/business/work...-1226333292525

    What are your thoughts??!

    Personally I think it's ridiculous that she 1) even thought she had a case and was happy for this to be made public .
    I'm not sure we can assume she was " happy" for it to be made public

    She sustained facial injuries from the glass, it all sounds pretty dreadful to me and she has had to retell the event who knows how many times to complete strangers, sounds stressful, embarrassing and unpleasant
    Last edited by Mod-biscotti; 20-04-2012 at 08:49.

  13. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Mod-biscotti For This Useful Post:

    chameleon  (22-04-2012),giggle berry  (20-04-2012),lambjam  (20-04-2012),share a book  (20-04-2012),shelle65  (20-04-2012)

  14. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    10,611
    Thanks
    404
    Thanked
    1,918
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    She wasn't happy for it to be public. She wasn't going to proceed unless the court suppressed her name.

  15. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MsMummy For This Useful Post:

    Mod-biscotti  (20-04-2012),share a book  (20-04-2012)

  16. #9
    lambjam's Avatar
    lambjam is offline Nitwit! Blubber! Oddment! Tweak!
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    7,177
    Thanks
    2,062
    Thanked
    4,956
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by biscotti View Post
    I'm not sure we can assume she was " happy" for it to be made public

    She sustained facial injuries from the glass, it all sounds pretty dreadful to me and she has had to retell the event who knows how many times to complete strangers, sounds stressful, embarrassing and unpleasant
    It does sound simply awful. I'm not sure how anyone could view this as money-grabbing.

  17. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lambjam For This Useful Post:

    giggle berry  (20-04-2012),Mod-biscotti  (20-04-2012),share a book  (20-04-2012)

  18. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    my house
    Posts
    18,115
    Thanks
    1,429
    Thanked
    7,702
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    What's wrong about her making the case public anyway?

    I guess she should be worrying what other people think

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to BigRedV For This Useful Post:

    share a book  (20-04-2012)


 

Similar Threads

  1. is workers compo worth it?
    By suemp in forum Family Finances
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-05-2012, 12:10
  2. has your child caused u or DH an injury?
    By RmumR in forum General Chat
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 14-02-2012, 09:25
  3. Work Injury
    By MissPoss in forum General Chat
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 22-01-2012, 20:00

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
Hunter Women's Health CentreHunter Women’s Health Centre care for women of all ages, in the full spectrum of their gynaecologic and obstetric ...
FORUMS - chatting now ...
REVIEWS
"Pigeon teats rule!"
by Alex
Pigeon PP Wide Neck reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›