+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    260
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked
    69
    Reviews
    0
    Different strokes for different folks.
    As I sit typing while breast feeding my 5 month old at 42.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to really old For This Useful Post:

    SpotTheOcelot  (25-03-2012)

  3. #12
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,125
    Thanks
    1,810
    Thanked
    1,694
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    I think as PP said, people are aware of the risks of more complications, and decreased fertility after the age of 35, and even moreso, after 40, but everyone weighs up what is more important for them.

    I always wanted my children young, I was pg with my first at 22 (which was a bit younger than I planned!), a lot of the reason for this was the increased risk of problems as maternal age increases. I wanted to be done before 30 (I'm peregnant with no. 4&5 now at 32). But I have missed out on a lot of other experiences that I could've had if I'd had my kids later.

    I don't think being older or younger makes you a better parent but I PERSONALLY wouldn't want to risk leaving it late because of all the biological stuff (assuming I had the choice, which a lot of women don't, like the right man isn't anywhere in sight!).

  4. #13
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,125
    Thanks
    1,810
    Thanked
    1,694
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Thermolicious View Post
    Have a look at this http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc..._pregnancy.pdf

    Not really an issue for me so I haven't really thought about it.
    Those statistics for Downs- I have always wondered if that is the number of babies actually born with DS (as it says 'chance of liveborn'), or the number of babies diagnosed in the womb with DS, before terminations etc. Does anyone know?

  5. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    260
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked
    69
    Reviews
    0
    It's the number of DS babies who would be born, but it's not the number who are born because of the terminations, as you say.

  6. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    260
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked
    69
    Reviews
    0
    Oh, allowing for the fact that a number of DS babies will spontaneously miscarry because of problems that are incompatable with life.

  7. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    2,610
    Thanks
    1,023
    Thanked
    511
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Thanks guys, we are planning to try for #6 in March of next year so I would be due at age 36 then the next one 38 so just a subject I am thinking about.

  8. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    1,908
    Thanks
    628
    Thanked
    650
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    I feel the same at 37 (bub #3) than at 31 when I had my first son. Fit and healthy. I do, however, choose to have a cvs- by choice - as it is a diagnostic test, not an indicator test.

  9. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    2,610
    Thanks
    1,023
    Thanked
    511
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    All my births were easy and short longest labor was 45 minutes and that was my first at 18 years old, this last one at 34 was prob 7 minutes or so very fast so I think that labor part is getting easier as I go along

  10. #19
    missybubble's Avatar
    missybubble is offline I'm a strange one, but I'm good at it :)
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    939
    Thanks
    630
    Thanked
    127
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    I can't comment personally but my old boss had perfect healthy babies at 38 and 41.

  11. #20
    Eko's Avatar
    Eko is offline Acrobatic Dominatrix.
    Winner 2012 - Most Politically Correct Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    2,837
    Thanks
    1,083
    Thanked
    1,427
    Reviews
    9
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    From what I've seen, the general consensus is that there's more risks the older you get, but that if you want to have kids at that age or older it's up to you to make that choice.
    At least, that's what I thought heh.


 

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-06-2012, 14:57
  2. Who is older?
    By Niki in forum General Chat
    Replies: 85
    Last Post: 18-02-2012, 22:08

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
Baby SensoryBaby Sensory is the only baby programme that offers a complete approach to learning & development. Our classes offer ...
FORUMS - chatting now ...
IVF babies due June/July/August 2017pregnancy and babies through IVF
April/May TTC group chatConception & Fertility General Chat
3 year old with mouth ulcersGeneral Child Health Issues
Miracle March TTC and Testing ChatConception & Fertility General Chat
IVF babies due Sep/Oct/Nov 2017pregnancy and babies through IVF
Show me your child/ren's night light/lampGeneral Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
REVIEWS
"Pigeon teats rule!"
by Alex
Pigeon PP Wide Neck reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›