+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    21
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked
    5
    Reviews
    20

    Question Sizing Scans?

    Hi everyone,
    Today I am 34 weeks and 5 days along, and I had a sizing ultrasound done today because I have gestational diabetes.

    So I was expecting them to tell me the baby was around 2.5kg which is a little more than he should be for my gestation, but I figured having gestational diabetes would mean he would be a little bigger.

    I've done really well maintaining my blood sugars at the right levels and my long term glucose testing shows that I've had perfect glucose control, but apparently I have a baby that is 3.1kg. He shouldn't be that big until 38 weeks. Having said that his leg and arm length are at the 38 weeks size too, so maybe he's just 'heavier' than normal because he's longer than normal.

    But then I remember reading about other peoples experiences with sizing scans and sometimes they aren't always accurate, but then I had the scan at a King Edward Memorial Hospital in Perth, which is the biggest maternity hospital in WA, so you'd think if anyone was going to get it right then they would.

    Anyone have any insight or experiences they are willing to share with me?

    I shouldn't start worrying about having a >4kg baby yet, my obstetrician appointment in on Monday, so I guess I'll be told more then. But I would love some reassurance that I'm not going to die from pain in labour LOL.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    14,057
    Thanks
    1,875
    Thanked
    2,608
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    At 38 weeks I had a sizing scan at KEMH and they said DD was measuring very small, they were going to induce me because they were worried she had stopped growing. She had other plans and arrived before they got the chance to even book me in for induction and she was a perfectly normal baby, on the small side but still within average proportions and weights. Certainly nothing what the scan showed.
    Then again a similar thing happened with DD2, though this time at Bunbury Regional, and this time DD2 was deemed to be growing sufficiently and her size/weight wasn't a concern at all. She was born only 208 grams bigger than DD1. Her scan was a lot more accurate.

    Its really touch and go, hey. Sometimes they have it right, sometimes they don't.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Guest1234 For This Useful Post:

    BeginnerMummy  (09-03-2012)


 

Similar Threads

  1. Inconsistent clarks kids shoe sizing?
    By SoThisIsLove in forum General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-11-2012, 16:19
  2. Tots bots and Mother ease Sizing?
    By Happyworld in forum Cloth Nappy Discussion Area
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 25-08-2012, 23:18
  3. Scans
    By ~YoungMumof3~ in forum Parents of Multiple-Births
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 22-01-2012, 18:57

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
FEATURED SUPPORTER
Baby MonitorsLooking to buy a baby monitor? :: Read viewer reviews of baby monitors BEFORE you buy :: Buy at a local or online Baby ...
FORUMS - chatting now ...
REVIEWS
"Made bed time less anxious"
by Meld85
My Little Heart Whisbear - the Humming Bear reviews ›
"Wonderful natural Aussie made product!"
by Mrstwr
Baby U Goat Milk Moisturiser reviews ›
"Replaced good quality with cheap tight nappies"
by Kris
Coles Comfy Bots Nappies reviews ›