+ Reply to Thread
Results 21 to 30 of 115
15-01-2012 14:14 #21Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
15-01-2012 14:16 #22
I own a home in the uk and do not allow pets, I don't think it's unreasonable either. We allowed my SIL to have a cat when she rented the place and it totally ruined the carpet, so much so that MIL paid for a replacement! I don't think it's discriminatory as pets can cause a lot of damage to properties.
15-01-2012 14:16 #23
I think it is reasonable to say no to pets ... as long as you are happy to limit your pool of applicants by doing so.
We have a cat, and have successfully rented 4 properties with her - in fact we've never been knocked back for a property (even when there are pet-less applicants applying), so I guess we must be ok
Seriously though, I know so many people who are renting 'strictly no pets' properties, and are keeping pets anyway. I definitely don't agree with it, but it happens. I'm not even talking a cat or a mouse - we're talking puppies, birds and snakes
IMO, having a tenant with a pet that you know about is a much lower risk than having a tenant with a pet that you DON'T know about.
15-01-2012 14:16 #24
We are renters who also own an ancient red heeler dog. Both the houses I have rented with Albie have had no carpet in them - polished wood and tiles only. This makes it so much easier to have him inside - it's a vacuum (I have a Dyson which is EXCELLENT for picking up dust and pet hair) and then a mop using a steam mop (disinfects without chemicals). I believe that if you didn't know I had Albie inside, you would be hard pressed to believe he was an inside dog on cold nights.
We get the yard sprayed for fleas and ticks when we move and make sure there is no evidence of him in the garden either.
I think that the right kind of tennants in a house that is pet friendly (which I spend time looking for - I don't want carpets in a house as it's too hard to remove all the dog hair, fleas, etc) can be fine, but tennants should be vetted thoroughly first (I've even had to provide references for the dog! and the landlord met him before we moved in). It must be so hard as a landlord to trust unknown tennents, especially after a bad experience though. And some properties would not be suitable for pets, inside or outside.
15-01-2012 14:22 #25
I think there would be fewer domestic pets at the shelter if pets are allowed. I know as a low income family, if I were to rent there would be very few properties to choose from in my price range, and even fewer if I wanted to have my furbabies with me. However, this is also why I only took on pets after I bought this place, not while renting. Too risky.
The Following User Says Thank You to share a book For This Useful Post:
15-01-2012 14:27 #26
Because this sort of thing is so rife, the property manager at the agency we deal with always goes to the neighbours and susses out whether the neighbours have pets. She doesn't ask are they 'hiding' any, she does it in a way where she asks if next door's pet"s) are bothering them or something like that. I am always amazed at how quickly people are to disclose to her if their neighbours are indeed 'hiding' pets and somehow she always gets the anwers she's seeking.
Last edited by Mod-Uniquey; 15-01-2012 at 14:29.
The Following User Says Thank You to Mod-Uniquey For This Useful Post:
Ali G (15-01-2012)
15-01-2012 14:32 #27
15-01-2012 14:34 #28
If they had a good rental history and papers for the animal such as it being desexed registered etc. Then I would allow it shows me they are responsible.
Properly trained and cared for animal do very little damage if any. Certainly less then some tenants with no pets.
15-01-2012 14:35 #29
We have rented to many tenants with pets, dogs are the biggest problem, I would say in my office it's 50/50 , half the tenants that have had dogs have caused damage/smell /fleas/problems with neighbors because of barking etc and the other half are perfect! So it does come down obviously to dog and owner , I would say about 25% of our landlords allow dogs, we have a dog clause in regards to fleas and damage and require dog references ( and I've written quite a few!) but yes the bonds always don't cover the damage! I do like the idea of an aded dog bond though, that would make our landlords feel a bit safer
15-01-2012 14:36 #30Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
By FunKy~Mummy in forum Conception issues & ttcReplies: 274Last Post: 18-06-2015, 20:02
By Ffrenchknickers in forum General ChatReplies: 53Last Post: 06-08-2012, 07:48
By GreenMama in forum House & GardensReplies: 4Last Post: 05-02-2012, 19:33
Hunter Women's Health CentreHunter Women’s Health Centre care for women of all ages, in the full spectrum of their gynaecologic and obstetric ...
LATESTWhat is a blessing way? How is it different to a baby shower?7 ways to break the ‘mumnotony’ at homeGuide to government family benefit payments
POPULARWhen can I start giving chores to my children?New baby nursery checklist – a guide to newborn essentialsWhat to pack for labour and hospital – a checklist
FORUMS - chatting now ...
Would you breastfeed in public?General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
A - Z of baby girl namesGames & fun stuff
How long would you leave your 8 (almost 9) year old at home alone?General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
2.5yo hitting/pushing (possible ASD)Discipline & behaviour
Show me your lunchbox 2017!!Recipes & Lunchbox Ideas
Adelaide Hubbers #2Adelaide
The Not So Serious Vent Thread #7General Chat