I have to say I agree with this opinion. Disgusting.
Seems all you have to do is say that you'll mess with the child's relationship with yourself and YOU get granted sole custody with a ban on the other parent having any contact until the child becomes an adult.
So messed up it's not funny.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 34
24-11-2011 23:31 #1
Refusal to provide access 'supported' by the Family Court
Last edited by Formerly Mick; 24-11-2011 at 23:39.
24-11-2011 23:55 #2
There HAS to be more to it?!
As it read, I honestly can't see why it's reason enough to ban visitation/shared care?...
25-11-2011 00:01 #3Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
You really cannot form an opinion based on a headline, a few comments and a short article.
Read the judgement when it is published and it may (or it may not) make more sense.
25-11-2011 00:02 #4
After a long legal battle, the court ruled it would be pointless to order shared care of the girl because the mother was determined to ignore court orders and destroy the daughter's relationship with her father.
The court said while it was not in the best interests of the child, the only solution was to ban contact between father and daughter until she turned 18.
Last edited by Formerly Mick; 25-11-2011 at 00:08.
25-11-2011 00:10 #5
I reckon there's a lot more to the story...
The Following User Says Thank You to MoonGecko For This Useful Post:
25-11-2011 00:11 #6Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
It is interesting how vastly different media outlets can be - just look at the way each article mentioned above reported this story.
I still stand by my comment that you need to read the whole judgement before you can form an opinion but based on the ABC article alone I can see why the Court made such an order. It is not in a child's best interest to see parents at each other's throats to the point of violence, to have to be dragged to child psych over and over again for applications and responses that will be brought by both parents each time they do not get what they want, and no doubt in this case to be subject to both parents denigrating the other in front of the child.
Family Court orders are fluid and so they can be varied if circumstances change.
No doubt this judgement will be appealed.
The Following User Says Thank You to MsTruth For This Useful Post:
25-11-2011 00:11 #7
that's so wrong surely there had to be more to it as much as I disagree with many of the shared care rules (mostly those that effect breastfeeding etc) this is a huge step backwards for fathers rights
25-11-2011 07:06 #8
Based on the ABC article I can see why the court may have felt that way. Although I find a total ban to be slightly ridiculous. There are other options that could've been used. Even with the violence & nastiness between me and exDP he was still given visitation; the judge ordered police station handovers and put a ban on us contacting each other directly and a denegration order on us too.
25-11-2011 07:24 #9
Got to be WAY more to the story here...
"There are a number of extremely fraught issues between the parents," Ms Ford said.
"There were allegations of violence between them; there are allegations of abuse in relation to the child; there is evidence of the father's attitude towards the mother, which is negative.
"And then there is also a lot of evidence as to the mother's attitude towards the father, which is also negative."
"The courts have been very careful not to in any way be seen to be complementing, congratulating or condoning the actions and attitudes of each of the parents, and this isn't a case where one should see that the mother has been vindicated in her actions.
Last edited by MilkingMaid; 25-11-2011 at 07:26.
The Following User Says Thank You to MilkingMaid For This Useful Post:
25-11-2011 07:27 #10Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
That poor kid.
The Following User Says Thank You to NancyBlackett For This Useful Post:
Maternity ClothesLooking to buy maternity clothes? :: Check the bubhub directory of local & online maternity clothes shops :: Find ...
LATESTWhat is a blessing way? How is it different to a baby shower?7 ways to break the ‘mumnotony’ at homeGuide to government family benefit payments
POPULARWhen can I start giving chores to my children?New baby nursery checklist – a guide to newborn essentialsWhat to pack for labour and hospital – a checklist
FORUMS - chatting now ...
Would you breastfeed in public?General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
A - Z of baby girl namesGames & fun stuff
How long would you leave your 8 (almost 9) year old at home alone?General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
2.5yo hitting/pushing (possible ASD)Discipline & behaviour
Show me your lunchbox 2017!!Recipes & Lunchbox Ideas
Adelaide Hubbers #2Adelaide
The Not So Serious Vent Thread #7General Chat