Doubletake Tandem

Product Details
Find pram and stroller retailers locally and online in the Bub Hub Australian Pregnancy & Parenting Directory.

Product Ratings
Durability
87%
Value for $
93%
Suitable from birth
0%
Collapsibility
57%
Lightweight
83%
Storage space
87%
Accessories
60%
Guest
Summary: Great shopping pram
November 28th, 2007
Pros: This pram is great for the shops as it has a huge basket and is slim enough to get through nondisabled checkouts.

I found it to be robust enough for walking around streets.

My toddler cant grab or kick the baby. Being at the front of the pram seems to be a good distraction for her too.



Cons: The toddler seat when reclined does not leave alot of space for bubs feet but as time goes by, the toddler will sleep less and walk around the shops.

It has a wide turning circle due to its length thus why I gave it a 7 for manoeuvrability. There doesnt seem to be accessories readily available but I just use a portacot net as a sun shade.
Review Ratings
Manoeuvrability
Durability
Collapsibility
Lightweight
Storage space
Value for $
Accessories
Suitable from birth
illawarramumof2boys
Summary: great, highly recommended
September 3rd, 2007
this is the best pram i have owned. i have had 4 different prams so far and this is by far the best and the cheapest i've bought. i highly recommend it. it still holds my 5 year old son's weight easily too.
Review Ratings
Manoeuvrability
Durability
Collapsibility
Lightweight
Storage space
Value for $
Accessories
Suitable from birth
Guest
Summary: 9
May 23rd, 2007
I love the Valco Doubletake, it has been a godsend when having two kids close together. The pram is as easy to manoeuvre as the single-baby pram I had previously, and it's no heavier. The only problem I've had with this pram is the breaking of one of the press-studs that hold the basket on, but this was my fault as I tugged it a bit too hard :-)
Review Ratings
Manoeuvrability
Durability
Collapsibility
Lightweight
Storage space
Value for $
Accessories
Suitable from birth




view full showcase page >