"Use comprehension strategies to understand and discuss texts listened to, viewed or read independently"
By the end of Pre-P, even at 5y5m (youngest child in the class), I would expect a child could read an early reader which relies on knowing 1-2 high frequency words and being able to decode the other words on the page using the illustration (eg. The cat, The ball, The shoe etc). Then I would expect them to be able to recall a couple of the objects in the book. I wouldn't expect many 4y7m (the youngest child starting Pre-P) to be doing this. But by the end of the year, yes, I don't think that is unreasonable at all. If they could do that then they would also get a "tick" for meeting the expected level under that point.
I've spent (way too) many hours in moderation meetings picking apart curriculum, referring to department work samples and determining what "at level achievement" actually looks like for each child. It's never-ending!
But glancing over those things you posted and having worked in WA at every year level, plus having a child who went to school in WA until 1/4 of the way through year 1, so being familiar with how it's done over there, it all looks pretty reasonable to me.
Fwiw my ds did kindy and pre primary in wa before moving to nsw. We loved the wa school and he really thrived there.
Moving to nsw for year 1 he has really struggled and is extremely far behind. Socially as well its been hard, the play-based wa system really helped him build confidence, where as his school in nsw only really focused on academics and not so much the socially or emotional growth of the child. To me school should focus on the whole child and not just how good their naplan results are (that's what it seems like to me anyway).
We have an opportunity to move back to wa shortly (prior to the next child starting pre primary) and we are more than happy to head back there.
Quite love the WA system tbh.
Eta: for anyone who is interested, he learnt 60 sight words in pre primary as opposed to the 150 he would have known if he had completed the same year (kindy) in his nsw school. However, he did almost double the comprehension tasks in wa than they did at the same stage in nsw.
The other difference was that wa spent lots of time promoting computers, science and Italian in wa. No other languages in nsw and the computers and science are taught by the classroom teacher in nsw.
Last edited by misho; 27-08-2016 at 19:57.
My children's school has language (Arabic) and there are a few public schools around here that offer languages but it's not in every school which is a shame.
I'm not sure if you live in the area listed as your postcode but I don't live far from there and I assume vast majority of parents would have high expectations of their children and the school and expect them to do well in NAPLAN meaning that a lot of other stuff gets left behind. This is what I hate about NAPLAN and the myschool website and publishing of results.
I don't see a problem with primary school teachers teaching science. They do learn about all KLA's in university. I don't teach my own class at the moment and I have often gone in to teach primary classes science and I love it. This term I'm teaching "material world" to stage 2 and we are having heaps of fun. It's not like I need a degree in science to teach them solids and liquids.
Can you tell me what kind of comprehension tasks you're talking about?
There's a new initiative in NSW public schools and it is very successful. It teaches children to read for meaning from the beginning rather than just learning sight words by rote. The school I work at and my children's school implement it but it's not mandated by the dept yet but I assume it will be soon given its success.
I also studied my Grad Dip Ed in WA and the emphasis was 100% on supporting children to learn to read texts as a whole. Sight words are only used for really HF words that cannot be decoded in another way. I never saw M100W etc, kids being given certificates for learning the next level and so on. The focus was always on text in context.
My overall point though was that the WA dept aren't bullies making parents send their 4.5 year olds to school. A combination of a multitude of differences means that the younger kids don't struggle there the way they might in a Vic Prep classroom.
On a weekly rotational basis, one week they'd have a very very basic reader, and then the next week they'd get a book with questions that they'd have to answer eg: what did Jonny jump over to get away from the dog?
I guess, if we hadn't tried the WA system first, we would never had known any different. It has been extremely difficult to catch up to the nsw standards. It's not nice to see your kid try really hard but get the equivalent of a D in his report for literacy, simply because his last school did things differently and he's starting year 1 from under the baseline.
It would be wonderful to have the national curriculum all across the country, and in this case it doesn't seem to be followed. But I really do love that the 1st year of school is a bit more relaxed.
Funnily enough,when I've compared the naplan results for year 3 for both schools, they are very, very similar.
Last edited by misho; 28-08-2016 at 09:32.
I consider that we were very fortunate that she adjusted well but appreciate that not every parent is a trained teacher with the skills and knowledge to support such a transition.
I did hold hope that a National curriculum could help this issue vbut further experience has quashed that hope for me. See this is an issue of "how" and not what.
Last year, for example, I was using VCOP and 7 Steps to support my students as writers with great success. DD's teacher last year was using the same 2 programs but her style of implementing them put so much pressure on DD to remember so many things at once, her writing went backwards. Her teacher this year - again using the same 2 programs - has turned her writing around yet again and she is back to being above the expected level.
All 3 of us have read the same books and, technically speaking, teaching the same stuff theoretically the same way but with vastly different results for the individual.
Pregnant for the first-time?
Not sure where to start? We can help!