+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 12 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 113
  1. #51
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,976
    Thanks
    1,940
    Thanked
    1,494
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    On grandparents raising grandchildren... in most (not all) of those cases, they already have parented, so know what they are in for.

    A first time parent at "grandparent age" (I mean over 60 but my aunt became one at 40 lol) does not know. They have NO idea.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to DT75 For This Useful Post:

    Marchbundle  (03-08-2016)

  3. #52
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,976
    Thanks
    1,940
    Thanked
    1,494
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by TortoiseNotTheHare View Post
    This is a really tricky one. I'm not sure where I stand on it but for those that say she's too old... my question would be, where do you draw the line? Is when your own eggs are too old to use? If so, what about those in their late 30's or 40's that have been told their eggs are simply too old or that they no longer have enough. Does that mean their bio clock is up and that's the universe saying they don't have enough life in them to raise a child? Does that mean people travelling overseas for donor eggs when theirs are too old should be stopped? What if someone is still deemed to be young by society but their eggs are too old to conceive. Should technology jump in to save the day or should that woman be told she's missed her shot because that's what her body has decided.

    I want to be in clear in saying that's not my opinion - just all questions I'm curious about now.
    For me, when you hit menopause. It's sad, it's harsh, and it's unfair. But it's biology. Your body is saying "time is up" and we are supposed to listen to our bodies.

  4. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to DT75 For This Useful Post:

    BlondeinBrisvegas  (04-08-2016),cheeeeesecake  (03-08-2016),Marchbundle  (03-08-2016),SuperGranny  (04-08-2016)

  5. #53
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    2,963
    Thanks
    2,383
    Thanked
    2,071
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    I personally think that 63 is too old to have a baby. I'm just thinking about the baby. Someone in the thread mentioned that people can die at any age and this is true but the father is going to be in his 80s when the little girl is 5. The chance that this baby could become an orphan in the next decade is a lot greater than if the parents were younger. It's not fair on the child I reckon. Just my opinion.

  6. #54
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    4,489
    Thanks
    554
    Thanked
    1,123
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    I certainly think a healthy 63 year old is capable of caring for a newborn. Like others though, I worry for the future. My mum is 78. She has no health issues at all and takes no medication. Despite this, she has slowed down considerably these past 3 or so years. She tires more quickly, can't walk as far, has far less stamina etc. She's really ageing.

    That's what bothers me about this. Even if this lady lives a long, healthy life (and I really hope she does), she will age and I honestly think this will effect how she parents.

  7. #55
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,528
    Thanks
    844
    Thanked
    1,951
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    As a parent, one of my biggest fears is passing away and leaving my children without their mother. I can't imagine knowing that it would be a certainty within the next 20 years. One of my closest friends lost her on mother when she was 20, & it has seriously,seriously altered her life forever. Her mum will never be there for her when she gets married, or support her when she had her own children, or babysit her grandkids. All of those moments as an adult when she 'needs' her mum, & she isnt there. I know there are worse things, but it's just not a choice that I think is fair to be intentionally making for a child when you bring it in to the world.

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to cheeeeesecake For This Useful Post:

    Phony  (04-08-2016),skye76  (04-08-2016),SuperGranny  (04-08-2016)

  9. #56
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks
    774
    Thanked
    1,128
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DT75 View Post
    For me, when you hit menopause. It's sad, it's harsh, and it's unfair. But it's biology. Your body is saying "time is up" and we are supposed to listen to our bodies.
    Yep I see where you are coming from but the issue is I've just read that menopause can occur from anywhere 35 - 65 years old. So in this case that could mean she is still yet to hit menopause.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to TortoiseNotTheHare For This Useful Post:

    MsViking  (03-08-2016)

  11. #57
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    23,039
    Thanks
    6,287
    Thanked
    17,285
    Reviews
    10
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    Awards:
    Bubhub Blogger - Thanks100 Posts in a week
    I admit I would never ever have a baby at 63 for lots of reasons. But frankly I feel that a 63 year old that loves the child and provides a stable home life for 20 years is better and more healthy than a lot of much younger parents. There are young ones (and I don't mean teens, say 40 and under) that have really toxic relationships with their partners. Who hate being parents and it shows in their parenting. That frivolously spend then have no money to pay bills or buy basics. That get pregnant for the wrong reasons.

    63 is not even close to best case scenario, I won't lie. But based on being a good parent, she may well be better than those 20 and 30 years her junior.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to delirium For This Useful Post:

    MsViking  (03-08-2016)

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,976
    Thanks
    1,940
    Thanked
    1,494
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by TortoiseNotTheHare View Post
    Yep I see where you are coming from but the issue is I've just read that menopause can occur from anywhere 35 - 65 years old. So in this case that could mean she is still yet to hit menopause.
    In that case, if she had fallen naturally, I would be fine with it.
    I would be closer to ok with it in relation to IVF but still not 100% as I feel there should be an age limit. But, again, I don't know what that should be.
    But chances are, she has hit it already.
    We just don't know.

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    23,039
    Thanks
    6,287
    Thanked
    17,285
    Reviews
    10
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    Awards:
    Bubhub Blogger - Thanks100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by TortoiseNotTheHare View Post
    Yep I see where you are coming from but the issue is I've just read that menopause can occur from anywhere 35 - 65 years old. So in this case that could mean she is still yet to hit menopause.
    My mother's side start puberty early and don't hit menopause until well into the 50's. At say 52 is it ok for me to keep procreating since nature says I'm still fertile? (fat chance lol but just playing devil's advocate)

  15. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to delirium For This Useful Post:

    DT75  (03-08-2016),MsViking  (03-08-2016)

  16. #60
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,278
    Thanks
    3,136
    Thanked
    3,462
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    I read Monash cut off at 53 because that's the average age of menopause.

  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Wise Enough For This Useful Post:

    DT75  (03-08-2016),VicPark  (03-08-2016)


 

Similar Threads

  1. *trigger* Highly sexual 3 year old or curious 3 year old?
    By redfacedredhead in forum General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 07-12-2016, 12:37
  2. Experiences of pregnancy and the year after birth - research help
    By Researcher CQUni in forum Research Help
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 27-06-2016, 08:41
  3. First birth versus second birth
    By rainbow road in forum Birth & Labour Questions
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 30-05-2016, 20:49

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
free weekly newsletters | sign up now!
who are these people who write great posts? meet our hubbub authors!
Learn how you can contribute to the hubbub!

reviews
learn how you can become a reviewer!

competitions

forum - chatting now
sales & new stuffsee all
Hire For Baby Perth
New RETAIL store - Perth Hire For Baby Perth
Here at Hire for Baby, we offer a wide range of products from Child Restraints to Strollers, Stroller Accessories and Oricom Baby Monitors. Wholesale prices - till the stock ends. Buy from us and get the installation for FREE.
Like us on Facebook and get $10 OFF
featured supporter
gotcha
X

Pregnant for the first-time?

Not sure where to start? We can help!

Our Insider Programs for pregnancy first-timers will lead you step-by-step through the 14 Pregnancy Must Dos!