+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    7,364
    Thanks
    2,566
    Thanked
    3,781
    Reviews
    7
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts

    Default Children who get a bedtime story read to them have an unfair advantage

    I read an article about this last night and have gone on to read the original article here now:

    http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/...values/6437058

    What are your thoughts?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    572
    Thanks
    164
    Thanked
    582
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    The main culprit of classism is capitalism, not families. Families contribute to it, yes, but to say that abolishing families would be effective is ridiculous.

  3. #3
    Mod-Nomsie's Avatar
    Mod-Nomsie is offline Administrator
    Winner 2009/10/11/12/13 - Most helpful Moderator
    Winner 2011 - Naughtiest/Cheekiest Mod
    Winner - Quickest 'Thanker' on the Hub
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Vic
    Posts
    23,657
    Thanks
    6,899
    Thanked
    7,026
    Reviews
    3
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    Awards:
    200 Posts in a week100 Posts in a weekBusiest Member of the Week - week ended 15/1/15
    Sub. Only halfway through the article but dd wants to play.
    The point re private schooling vs bedtime stories is interesting though...

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mod-Nomsie For This Useful Post:

    BlissedOut  (06-05-2015),smallpotatoes  (06-05-2015)

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    my house
    Posts
    17,696
    Thanks
    1,391
    Thanked
    7,285
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    The article was too long for me. I started reading but found it boring

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to BigRedV For This Useful Post:

    VicPark  (06-05-2015)

  7. #5
    BH-KatiesMum's Avatar
    BH-KatiesMum is offline Community Manager
    Winner 2008 - The most optimistic poster
    Winner 2014 - Most Helpful Moderator
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Perth WA
    Posts
    22,393
    Thanks
    5,359
    Thanked
    5,806
    Reviews
    3
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    Awards:
    Past Moderator
    200 Posts in a week100 Posts in a week
    tl:dr - well I read half

    and found it theoretical garbage. Seriously ... a strong family bond and parenting disadvantages those who dont have it, so the solution is to disband it for all?

    really?

    not provide those benefits to the disadvantaged kids some other way ... but reduce all to the lowest common denominator.


  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to BH-KatiesMum For This Useful Post:

    HillDweller  (06-05-2015),Oblena  (06-05-2015),Rose&Aurelia&Hannah  (06-05-2015),snowqu33n  (07-05-2015)

  9. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Inner West
    Posts
    3,267
    Thanks
    1,892
    Thanked
    1,916
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the WeekBusiest Member of the Week - week ended 19/9/2014Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 17/7/2014200 Posts in a week100 Posts in a week
    It's a philosophical argument, not meant to be taken as parenting advice. It can be read to make a subtle but strong case for same sex parenting and donor IVF parenting though by arguing that it's the actions and method of the parenting that has the biggest effect - not the biological relationship or in fact the number of parents (it suggests that their theories still apply if there are three parents instead of two).

    It's a thought piece.

    Hilarious that the Daily Telegraph is making a fuss about it but not surprising, there's not a lot of philosophy in them there pages.

  10. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ScubaGal For This Useful Post:

    AdornedWithCats  (06-05-2015),Busy-Bee  (06-05-2015),deku  (06-05-2015),Rose&Aurelia&Hannah  (06-05-2015),snowqu33n  (07-05-2015)

  11. #7
    SuperGranny's Avatar
    SuperGranny is offline Worlds best grandma! Winner 2012 - Most Helpful Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    sunshine coast qld
    Posts
    6,140
    Thanks
    4,541
    Thanked
    2,720
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    I thought it was meant to be a joke. seriously, why try to make the human race a level playing field. ?? are we all going to work for 50cents a day, and live on top of rubbish tips. that is what the largest percentage of the people in the world do. ?? marie.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to SuperGranny For This Useful Post:

    VicPark  (06-05-2015)

  13. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,368
    Thanks
    498
    Thanked
    1,479
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ScubaGal View Post
    It's a philosophical argument, not meant to be taken as parenting advice. It can be read to make a subtle but strong case for same sex parenting and donor IVF parenting though by arguing that it's the actions and method of the parenting that has the biggest effect - not the biological relationship or in fact the number of parents (it suggests that their theories still apply if there are three parents instead of two).

    It's a thought piece.

    Hilarious that the Daily Telegraph is making a fuss about it but not surprising, there's not a lot of philosophy in them there pages.
    I was going to try and write a response but ScubaGal summed it up so well I have nothing more to add!

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to deku For This Useful Post:

    ScubaGal  (06-05-2015)

  15. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    930
    Thanks
    216
    Thanked
    297
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    I'm disadvantaging other kids because I read to my DD every night? I can see the philosophical point they are trying to make but I don't agree with it. I read to DD because I know it will give her an advantage developmentally. I don't see it as me personally disadvantaging other kids because I have no control over their lives. If I publically advocated for not reading to kids whilst still reading to DD then that would be different.

    Lowering the bar instead of aiming to bring those who are disadvantaged up is a terrible theory. It would have a negative impact on society. The supposed benefits of leveling the playing field wouldn't outweigh the negative in making more children disadvantaged & restricting thier development.

    The benefits of a good family unit (regardless of how it is made up) is a good point to consider though.

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using The Bub Hub mobile app

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Izzys Dragon For This Useful Post:

    Rose&Aurelia&Hannah  (06-05-2015)

  17. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    7,364
    Thanks
    2,566
    Thanked
    3,781
    Reviews
    7
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mod-Nomsie View Post
    The point re private schooling vs bedtime stories is interesting though...
    I think the link here is that parents who read to their kids are willing to invest the time and are likely to be loving, whereas just being able to financially provide private schooling doesn't mean the parent is emotionally present.

    I agree with the comments suggesting that we shouldn't be aiming to make our children equal with the lowest common denominator and rather should be trying to put systems in place to bring the LCD up to a more acceptable level.

  18. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to JR03 For This Useful Post:

    Mod-Nomsie  (06-05-2015),Rose&Aurelia&Hannah  (06-05-2015),snowqu33n  (07-05-2015)


 

Similar Threads

  1. Do you read parenting books for your toddler/older children?
    By French Pear in forum General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 11-08-2014, 19:48
  2. Share bedtime routine with 2 young children
    By 2BlueBirds in forum General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-08-2014, 16:04

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
free weekly newsletters | sign up now!
who are these people who write great posts? meet our hubbub authors!
Learn how you can contribute to the hubbub!

reviews
learn how you can become a reviewer!

competitions

forum - chatting now
christmas gift guidesee all Red Stocking
Babybee Prams
Save $50 in our pre-Christmas sale! All Comet's now only $500. Our bassinet & stroller set includes free shipping AUS wide, $75 free accessories, 18-months warranty & a 9 month free return policy. Check out our new designer range today!
sales & new stuffsee all
Wendys Music School Melbourne
Wondering about Music Lessons? FREE 30 minute ASSESSMENT. Find out if your child is ready! Piano from age 3 years & Guitar, Singing, Drums, Violin from age 5. Lessons available for all ages. 35+ years experience. Structured program.
Use referral 'bubhub' when booking
featured supporter
Einsteinz Music
Fun & interactive music classes!
Classes are taught by professional musicians! Children are taught the fundamentals of music: beat, pitch, rhythm and tempo through hands-on experience. Click for more details!!!
gotcha
X

Pregnant for the first-time?

Not sure where to start? We can help!

Our Insider Programs for pregnancy first-timers will lead you step-by-step through the 14 Pregnancy Must Dos!