+ Reply to Thread
Page 12 of 18 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 173
  1. #111
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    480
    Thanks
    308
    Thanked
    578
    Reviews
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by CMF View Post
    Ruin you? Really? So if he gets a promotion, CSA will take ALL of his pay rise PLUS more?
    Maybe you need help with budgeting?
    no we dont need help budgeting. we're running a fine line as it is and yes with his promotion they will take the lot as its a new tax bracket.

  2. #112
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    2,226
    Thanks
    3,792
    Thanked
    2,210
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MrsBid View Post
    No one is saying they can move on from their kids. But if you go by whats being said here. mum can move on have more kids get married and thats all fine. But dad whos paying child support absolutely cant because how dare he
    We can't be reading the same thread because I was thinking no first wife has a right to having her nails done but anyway.....

    He has as much control over her having more children as she has over him having more children and rightly so. That would be like the ex having a say in the size of family you have.

    The same rules apply to men and woman in regards to paying and receiving child support.

    When you call child support they don't ask whether you are male or female before starting a case, same rules for either sex.

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mokeybear For This Useful Post:

    atomicmama  (14-10-2014),PomPoms  (13-10-2014)

  4. #113
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    480
    Thanks
    308
    Thanked
    578
    Reviews
    0
    of course they dont ask that but the facts are its mostly the women with most of the care of the children and the men copping sh!t for having their 'new family' my posts were all without men or women being mentioned until it as quite obvious that men moving on is the issue

  5. #114
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    2,226
    Thanks
    3,792
    Thanked
    2,210
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MrsBid View Post
    of course they dont ask that but the facts are its mostly the women with most of the care of the children and the men copping sh!t for having their 'new family' my posts were all without men or women being mentioned until it as quite obvious that men moving on is the issue
    By the same token there are plenty of unemployed dads out there too.

    There is nothing wrong with having a 'new' family but the other parent has an equal right to that as well.

  6. #115
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    22,846
    Thanks
    6,200
    Thanked
    16,892
    Reviews
    10
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    Awards:
    Bubhub Blogger - Thanks100 Posts in a week
    Men cop no more sh*t for moving on than women do, as has been seen in this thread. Let's keep in mind that when the non custodial parent has more kids to someone else, his CS goes down to his 'first' children. It's been argued here why should the ex fund her lifestyle to stay at home. But why should his kids pay because he goes on to keep procreating? His other children suddenly don't eat less since Dad has had more babies to someone else, yet they get less.

    It goes both ways.

  7. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to delirium For This Useful Post:

    atomicmama  (14-10-2014),CMF  (13-10-2014),meljemillie  (14-10-2014),Mokeybear  (13-10-2014),VicPark  (14-10-2014)

  8. #116
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    3,516
    Thanks
    432
    Thanked
    3,245
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    I used to think my idea was pretty crappy but now not so much.
    1/3 rent, 1/3 gas, 1/3 power, 1/3 food.**
    1/2 school fees, PHI, extra curriculars, maybe $25-50 p/f to be put away for when kids need new clothes (so if you double it, it's $50 p/f for each child that can go into a savings account for when it's needed.

    Anyway, I think it'd be a good idea.

    I say 1/3 rent, etc, 'cause the payee also has a household to run.
    I also don't think household expenses should be shared in a 50/50 scenario but the rest should.

    Eta: I also think only debts accrued before child support started needing to be paid should be taken into an assessment and not ones after so if people opt to go and buy a $50k car in an attempt to not pay c/s well that's just too bad for them. And if someone willingly quits their job to avoid paying it then they get roughly 15-20% of their centerlink taken directly from their pay.

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using The Bub Hub mobile app
    Last edited by Jennaisme; 13-10-2014 at 22:33.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Jennaisme For This Useful Post:

    Luna Lovegood  (14-10-2014)

  10. #117
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    480
    Thanks
    308
    Thanked
    578
    Reviews
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by delirium View Post
    Men cop no more sh*t for moving on than women do, as has been seen in this thread. Let's keep in mind that when the non custodial parent has more kids to someone else, his CS goes down to his 'first' children. It's been argued here why should the ex fund her lifestyle to stay at home. But why should his kids pay because he goes on to keep procreating? His other children suddenly don't eat less since Dad has had more babies to someone else, yet they get less.

    It goes both ways.
    by the same reason that if he had more children to the first woman the kids would have to share and not receive as much. If she goes on to have more children and quits her job he has to pay more because she decided she wanted more children why should he and his new family have to pay for that? very rarely does it actually go DOWN when the child support payer has more children

  11. #118
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    2,226
    Thanks
    3,792
    Thanked
    2,210
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MrsBid View Post
    by the same reason that if he had more children to the first woman the kids would have to share and not receive as much. If she goes on to have more children and quits her job he has to pay more because she decided she wanted more children why should he and his new family have to pay for that? very rarely does it actually go DOWN when the child support payer has more children
    So what is the solution to keep everybody happy? Forced sterilisation for both of them as part of the divorce package?

    I guess it would stop the argument.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Mokeybear For This Useful Post:

    ourbradybunch  (13-10-2014)

  13. #119
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    4,222
    Thanks
    894
    Thanked
    3,218
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MrsBid View Post
    very rarely does it actually go DOWN when the child support payer has more children
    Ermm... yes it does. A 'dependent child' amount is deducted from his assessed income.

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CMF For This Useful Post:

    Mokeybear  (13-10-2014),peanutmonkey  (14-10-2014)

  15. #120
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    480
    Thanks
    308
    Thanked
    578
    Reviews
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by CMF View Post
    Ermm... yes it does. A 'dependent child' amount is deducted from his assessed income.
    oh right people in this thread must be lying then

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to MrsBid For This Useful Post:

    Ashram  (14-10-2014)


 

Similar Threads

  1. Child Support TO BE OR NOT TO BE?
    By darianiika in forum Pregnancy & Birth General Chat
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 09-04-2014, 06:17
  2. Please help re: child support
    By Mummabearto2 in forum Single Parents
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 24-11-2013, 18:00

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
free weekly newsletters | sign up now!
who are these people who write great posts? meet our hubbub authors!
Learn how you can contribute to the hubbub!

reviews
learn how you can become a reviewer!

competitions

forum - chatting now
christmas gift guidesee all Red Stocking
Nice Pak Products
Australian Made and Owned. The Baby U Goat Milk Skincare range is enriched with soothing goats milk sourced from country, Victoria. Goat's milk has a pH level close to that of our own skin and contains natural sources of amino acids and vitamins.
sales & new stuffsee all
True Fairies
True Fairies is the first interactive website where children can engage and speak with a real fairy through the unique webcam fairy portal. Each session is tailored to the child, and is filled with enchantment and magic.
Visit website to find out more!
featured supporter
Little Kickers NSW
Little Kickers was launched in 2002 in the UK and arrived Down Under in 2009. Our motto is “Play not Push” and we provide a positive fun-filled soccer program for children aged 18 months -7 years in a vibrant, group play environment.
gotcha
X

Pregnant for the first-time?

Not sure where to start? We can help!

Our Insider Programs for pregnancy first-timers will lead you step-by-step through the 14 Pregnancy Must Dos!