No. I wouldn't. I haven't read the article, but no.
What I don't get about this is it's so easy to explain/fob off/trick 4 yr olds - why go through the hassle of actually dyeing their hair?
She could have used food colouring & just said that's how it's done for little kids or just said that kids can't have hair dye as it's bad for them. 4 yr olds take what we say as gospel.
I reckon this is more about the mum than the kid tbh - trying to prove she is fostering individuality and/or enjoying the drama it has created.
I haven't read all of the comments, but no way.
Whatever happened to just saying no? It seems so many parents are afraid to say the 'n' word.
I don't see anything wrong with allowing my kids to colour their hair. I just wouldn't use actual hair dye; those chemicals can burn adult scalps, I can only imagine what they'd do to the more sensitive skin of a kid.
Chalks, food dye, clips, hair spray, etc I wouldn't have a problem with.
Why does everyone assume just because she said yes to this the child gets everything she wants? We all have our boundaries. My girls can ask til the moon lands in my backyard for me to have their ears pierced and the answer will still be no. But I say yes to other things.
This is a small snapshot of someone's life. No doubt she'd never make the mistake of sharing again.
Pregnant for the first-time?
Not sure where to start? We can help!
Our Insider Programs for pregnancy first-timers will lead you step-by-step through the 14 Pregnancy Must Dos!