+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 50
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    278
    Thanks
    132
    Thanked
    89
    Reviews
    13
    I believe everyone should have better access to fertility assistance and it should be more affordable for those who need it, but I feel that there are higher risks with pregnancies of older women.

    That said it is hard to support a legislation that takes away women's choices.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    12,708
    Thanks
    9,558
    Thanked
    12,691
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 9/1/15Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 7/11/14Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 3/10/14100 Posts in a week
    I'm not sure about the cut off of 40. It's a bit harsh.

    However the thought of a 50 year old woman having a baby via IVF gives me a bad case of the heeby jeebies. At the least I don't think there should be any government assistance for IVF for a 50+ year old.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    4,953
    Thanks
    3,680
    Thanked
    1,949
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    My mum had me at 2 months off turning 40 and we are very close. I do think 40 is a bit young. Its hard to suggest an exact age but there does come a point where I think its not in the best interests of the child and parents.

    My sister had her 3rd child 2 years ago , concieved naturally at 42

    Sent from my GT-I9305T using The Bub Hub mobile app

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SoThisIsLove For This Useful Post:

    bhjules  (10-03-2014),Pusheen The Cat  (11-03-2014)

  5. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,017
    Thanks
    315
    Thanked
    584
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Loads of women conceive naturally at 40, it is definitely to young.

    I do however think there should be an age cut-off, not sure what that age should be though.

  6. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    22,848
    Thanks
    6,202
    Thanked
    16,895
    Reviews
    10
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    Awards:
    Bubhub Blogger - Thanks100 Posts in a week
    This makes me really really angry. Had IVF not been so damned expensive (we are looking at 8-10k per cycle in the country) we would have used it already and I'm not 40 but on the downward slope and DH is already in his 40's.

    Yes there is a higher likelihood of problems after 40 in both parents. But unless you have been through the absolute anguish of not being able to have a baby, you really have no basis to criticise.

    Could you imagine if they suggested banning IVF for under 25's bc they aren't 'mature' enough? or under 20's bc studies show there is also increased risk of issues as well?

  7. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to delirium For This Useful Post:

    bhjules  (11-03-2014),Busy-Bee  (15-03-2014),peanutmonkey  (11-03-2014),Rocky27  (12-03-2014),Sethysmum  (11-03-2014),Star Light  (11-03-2014)

  8. #16
    headoverfeet's Avatar
    headoverfeet is offline The truth will set you free, but first it will **** you off. -Gloria Steinem
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    18,954
    Thanks
    3,142
    Thanked
    4,892
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    Given the statistics in that article it does seem kind of wasteful of government $ to be funding ivf for the over 45's. Pretty sure using donor eggs would change that so that would have to be taken into consideration.

    Kind of sad that they fund it with such dismal statistics but don't fund surrogacy at all given it has a much higher success rate.

    Me + DF
    DS1- Sep '07
    DS2- Nov '08
    DD- July '11
    Our family is complete!

    Gestational Surrogate- FET#1 March '14

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to headoverfeet For This Useful Post:

    sky1  (11-03-2014)

  10. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    12,708
    Thanks
    9,558
    Thanked
    12,691
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 9/1/15Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 7/11/14Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 3/10/14100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by delirium View Post
    Could you imagine if they suggested banning IVF for under 25's bc they aren't 'mature' enough? or under 20's bc studies show there is also increased risk of issues as well?
    Do you really want me to answer these questions..?......

  11. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    22,848
    Thanks
    6,202
    Thanked
    16,895
    Reviews
    10
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    Awards:
    Bubhub Blogger - Thanks100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by VicPark View Post
    Do you really want me to answer these questions..?......

    lol I think I know your stance. But young'ens would be up in arms. But somehow it's ok to consider cutting funding for older women..... coz they are old!

    I also find those that are quick to jump on the bandwagon for cutting funding to older women have never had fertility issues. Come join some of the long term ttc threads I'm in people. Women that try for YEARS and just can't get pg. Oh wouldn't it be lovely to accidentally get pg over and over (that wasn't directed to you Vic, just a general whine)

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to delirium For This Useful Post:

    Sethysmum  (11-03-2014)

  13. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    8,806
    Thanks
    7,267
    Thanked
    9,720
    Reviews
    5
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    If the nhs is worried about cost, perhaps they should stop funding pseudoscientific therapies with no evidence to support their use and channel those funds to ivf instead, perhaps make it and other fertility treatments more affordable to women before they hit 40? Or make adoption more accessible?
    I don't agree with an arbitrary limit, no.

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Atropos For This Useful Post:

    Busy-Bee  (15-03-2014),CitrusRainxxx  (11-03-2014),delirium  (11-03-2014)

  15. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    22,848
    Thanks
    6,202
    Thanked
    16,895
    Reviews
    10
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    Awards:
    Bubhub Blogger - Thanks100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by Atropos View Post
    If the nhs is worried about cost, perhaps they should stop funding pseudoscientific therapies with no evidence to support their use and channel those funds to ivf instead, perhaps make it and other fertility treatments more affordable to women before they hit 40? Or make adoption more accessible?
    I don't agree with an arbitrary limit, no.
    Completely agree. Furthermore, give more funding full stop and take it back to where it was several years ago where the gap was smaller. Children should not be a right of the rich! I know it's a lot of money but the people that fall from IVF are raising future tax payers.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to delirium For This Useful Post:

    Atropos  (11-03-2014)


 

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 27-03-2014, 12:46
  2. Women needed for survey about NEW prenatal test
    By aimeeclaire in forum Research Help
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 25-02-2014, 21:12
  3. Voip.. who uses the internet to make calls etc? which app to use?
    By DesperatelySeekingSleep in forum House & Gardens
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 20-11-2013, 15:55

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
free weekly newsletters | sign up now!
who are these people who write great posts? meet our hubbub authors!
Learn how you can contribute to the hubbub!

reviews
learn how you can become a reviewer!

competitions

forum - chatting now
christmas gift guidesee all Red Stocking
Softmats
With so many amazing reversible designs, the soft and cushioned Premium Bubba Mats are the perfect space for all the family. Not only do they look fantastic; you can also enjoy the quality and comfort for years to come.
sales & new stuffsee all
True Fairies
True Fairies is the first interactive website where children can engage and speak with a real fairy through the unique webcam fairy portal. Each session is tailored to the child, and is filled with enchantment and magic.
Visit website to find out more!
featured supporter
Pea Pods Reusable Nappies
Pea Pods are the smart choice when it comes to choosing what's best for you, your baby and the environment. Affordable and simple to use, Pea Pods keep your baby dry & happy. Visit our website to find your nearest stockist or order online.
gotcha
X

Pregnant for the first-time?

Not sure where to start? We can help!

Our Insider Programs for pregnancy first-timers will lead you step-by-step through the 14 Pregnancy Must Dos!