Once a bub is 1/has finished breastfeeding there is no reason for the woman to work part time and the man work full time. Sure perhaps it is more difficult for the man to go part time if their work wasnt as flexible. They could always change jobs and let the woman be the key breadwinner... If a couple organised their life where the woman works part time and the man works full time then perhaps its a conscious decision they made for lifestyle reasons: perhaps the mum prefers to stay home with the kids.
We're better off creating policies that encourage businesses to invest in new adventures (lower tax, less paperwork, lower interest rates etc). Sure make training, education and childcare affordable through a partial subsidy (as per the current situation). But increasing the supply of labor without encouraging businesses to invest does not equal jobs and growth. Just a heap of educated unemployed people.
Last edited by VicPark; 24-09-2013 at 16:51.
If I had to choose though I'd choose free Uni over free childcare. Free childcare just increases the labor market (educated, uneducated, in demand or not). At least free Uni may result in efficiency gains in the long run (if coupled with appropriate business policy only).
Last edited by VicPark; 24-09-2013 at 17:53.
I'm sorry to burst your bubble VP, but many countries actually do it, and are doing it, right now as well speak. And they don't have a huge amount of educated unemployed.
And we used to do it - until not that long ago in fact. Nobody implemented it? What the heck are you talking about?
Where are you getting your views from? It certainly isn't from facts? Is this just what you think "may" happen if that comes into play?
I'd pick free childcare over Uni! Otherwise too many people go just for the social aspects and also do plebby degrees that won't help them get a decent job.
But I don't think either should be free. Although I vote Green I am definitely not socialist.
All you have to do is look at Norway.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/repor...ticle11959366/Norway is ranked No. 1 in the world for productivity, measured by GDP per total hours worked, according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Canada comes 17th, behind Spain.
“However, even after controlling for the rent [profits] from natural resources, Norway has high productivity. And more importantly, our relative productivity has increased a lot from the early 1990s to 2011, even after adjusting for natural resource rents,” explains Adne Cappelen, an economist at Statistics Norway.
Mr. Cappelen attributes Norway’s high productivity to four main factors:
1. A more educated work force, largely enabled by free university tuition;
2. Outsourcing low-wage, low-productivity labour;
3.Maximizing participation in the work force for skilled workers, (providing social support and flexible work for seniors and new parents);
4. Equal distribution of income.
I think the sooner we start caring about one another instead of being so individualistic, we will see that if Australians help one another out, support each other, ensure more fairness and equity, more access for everyone, better free social services and, health and education, childcare etc. we will see an amazing difference in how far forward our country could go.
I vote Green too and I wouldn't classify myself as a socialist.
If a country does have free Uni and fee childcare then before you compare that country to Australia you need to compare a whole heap of different social and economic indicators.
How do you think the Government should pay for such measures? Any cost benefits (if at all) will be many many years away.
Pregnant for the first-time?
Not sure where to start? We can help!
Our Insider Programs for pregnancy first-timers will lead you step-by-step through the 14 Pregnancy Must Dos!