+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 62
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,311
    Thanks
    2,387
    Thanked
    4,599
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BigRedV View Post
    Most of Australia was excited!

    Even better that John Howard lost his seat
    52 to 47 ... If it's the same this time will that be 'most of Australia'? Or just a redneck anomaly?

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to NancyBlackett For This Useful Post:

    kalgirl  (26-08-2013)

  3. #22
    Busy-Bee's Avatar
    Busy-Bee is offline Offending people since before Del :D
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    11,183
    Thanks
    3,664
    Thanked
    4,704
    Reviews
    2
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    Past Moderator - Thank you
    http://www.theage.com.au/federal-pol...825-2sjz8.html

    In today's SMH there is an interesting article written about former UK MP Tom Watson who helped blow the whistle on the phone hacking scam. Mr Watson describes Murdoch's election coverage as an "insult to Australians". The article goes on to say:

    A fortnight ago, the ABC's Media Watch analysed one week's political coverage in Mr Murdoch's Daily Telegraph. Of the 80 election stories it printed, the program deemed half negative to Labor but none negative to the Coalition.
    Murdoch owns circa 70% of newspapers in Australia but his influence doesn't sto there. Newspaper articles drive conversations, talk back radio, other media outlets. To think Murdoch's influence stops at the printed word on one of his newspapers is naive.

    Murdoch backs who ever is going to be in his best business interests. He then has the power and means to pretty much guarantee it happen. It's called living in a Murdochracy.



  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Busy-Bee For This Useful Post:

    Chunkydunks  (26-08-2013),NoteToSelf  (27-08-2013)

  5. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    my house
    Posts
    17,698
    Thanks
    1,391
    Thanked
    7,288
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NancyBlackett View Post
    52 to 47 ... If it's the same this time will that be 'most of Australia'? Or just a redneck anomaly?
    Does that mean I'm a redneck?

  6. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    my house
    Posts
    17,698
    Thanks
    1,391
    Thanked
    7,288
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NancyBlackett View Post
    52 to 47 ... If it's the same this time will that be 'most of Australia'? Or just a redneck anomaly?
    And if we want to get technical, then most means greatest in number? Don't think I was that far off!

  7. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,311
    Thanks
    2,387
    Thanked
    4,599
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BigRedV View Post
    Does that mean I'm a redneck?
    If the ugh boot fits

    Sorry. Couldn't resist!!

  8. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,311
    Thanks
    2,387
    Thanked
    4,599
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BigRedV View Post
    And if we want to get technical, then most means greatest in number? Don't think I was that far off!
    Those were the 2007 TPP figures.

  9. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    my house
    Posts
    17,698
    Thanks
    1,391
    Thanked
    7,288
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NancyBlackett View Post
    Those were the 2007 TPP figures.
    Yes, I know.

    Most means greater number?

  10. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    my house
    Posts
    17,698
    Thanks
    1,391
    Thanked
    7,288
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    Maybe I'm missing something?

    My brain is a bit fried today. Any who.

    Yep, news ltd. is biased!

  11. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,603
    Thanks
    126
    Thanked
    267
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Busy-Bee View Post
    Murdoch owns circa 70% of newspapers in Australia but his influence doesn't sto there.
    I can't believe how much that figure gets thrown around without question.

    Tim Blair dumbs it down quite nicely. http://blogs.news.com.au/dailytelegr...wnership_test/

    A simple two-question quiz determines your media ownership IQ:


    1:
    Jonathan buys 200 newspapers. He fills them with former Fairfax staffers and achieves zero circulation. How many newspapers does Jonathan own?


    2:
    Tracey buys 200 newspapers. She fills them with talented reporters and achieves massive circulation gains. How many newspapers does Tracey own?

    If your answer to both questions is the same number, congratulations. You’re smarter than Kevin Rudd, Lenore Taylor and Paul Barry. In case there’s any continuing dispute over the definition of newspaper ownership, let’s turn to our tax-funded academic friends at the Conversation:


    According to the Finkelstein Review of Media and Media Regulation, in 2011 News Corp Australia (then News Limited) accounted for 23% of the newspaper titles in Australia.


    In a rebuttal of Kevin Rudd’s claim, Sally Jackson from The Australian observed that News Corp Australia accounts for 33% of the newspaper titles that have sales audited by the Audit Bureau of Circulation …

    Kevin Rudd’s claim that Rupert Murdoch – or News Corp Australia – “owns 70% of the newspapers in this country” is, as a factual statement, false.
    And before you all rant and rave how much you don't like Tim Blair, here is the link to the Conversation.
    http://theconversation.com/factcheck...ustralia-16812

  12. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,603
    Thanks
    126
    Thanked
    267
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BigRedV View Post
    Maybe I'm missing something?

    My brain is a bit fried today. Any who.

    Yep, news ltd. is biased!
    As is the ABC. The big difference is: ALL taxpayers are paying for the ABC bias, whilst only those who pay for a News Ltd product is paying for their bias.

    At least you have the option not to give News Ltd any of your money. I wish I could do the same with the ABC!

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Father For This Useful Post:

    PlayNice  (02-09-2013)


 

Similar Threads

  1. Open or not open presents at kids party!
    By Happy2be3 in forum Birthdays
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 18-11-2012, 12:12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
free weekly newsletters | sign up now!
who are these people who write great posts? meet our hubbub authors!
Learn how you can contribute to the hubbub!

reviews
learn how you can become a reviewer!

competitions

forum - chatting now
christmas gift guidesee all Red Stocking
Fridge-To-Go Australasia
Xmas with a NEW Fridge-to-go Lunch Bag! Fridge-To-Go Australasia
Fridge-to-go 8 hour cooler bags are ideal under the Christmas tree! Now in modern lunch bag designs - fill them with toys and chocolate to make parents and kids happy! Stay super cool and eat healthy and fresh food all summer long!
sales & new stuffsee all
Pea Pods
Buy 2 Award Winning Pea Pods Reusable One Size Nappies for only $38 (in your choice of colours) and receive a FREE roll of Bamboo Liners. Don't miss out, we don't usually have discounts on the nappies, so grab this special offer!
Special Offer! Save $12
featured supporter
The Fix Program Sydney CBD and Broadway
Pregnancy and women's health physio, pregnancy and new mum Pilates classes taught by our physios for you and bub. Pregnancy back and pelvic pain. Also, we treat postnatal and women of all ages. Incontinence, prolapse, sexual and pelvic pain.
gotcha
X

Pregnant for the first-time?

Not sure where to start? We can help!

Our Insider Programs for pregnancy first-timers will lead you step-by-step through the 14 Pregnancy Must Dos!