Closed Thread
Page 25 of 59 FirstFirst ... 15232425262735 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 250 of 589
  1. #241
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4,786
    Thanks
    1,020
    Thanked
    2,246
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirst33 View Post
    So does that mean if you're staunchly pro-choice that there is no time during a pregnancy where you feel a baby's life and right to life should be considered? Even if it is at a gestation that is viable outside the mother?

    I am understanding everyone's argument now and very unsure where I now stand. But curious about this part. Does it never reach a point where the baby has a right to life? (I'm not talking about if the mother's life is in danger).
    Yes if you are pro choice then the choice of the mother always outweighs the right of the baby to life. So of we take the 30 week example if the mother chooses she no longer wants to be pregnant then the baby has no rights. A baby born at 30 weeks may not survive or may be born with sever health problems. While doctors may try to save the baby the mothers choice comes first even of that means the baby will survive but has health issue. She would have the right to stop the pregnancy at any stage no matter what the effects on the baby.
    So in theory the mothers choice will impact the life of the baby if it survives.

    This is one of the reasons why these laws are in place.

  2. #242
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Qld
    Posts
    26,930
    Thanks
    2,736
    Thanked
    6,743
    Reviews
    2
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 postsDiamond Star - 20,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by lambjam View Post
    I think perhaps people confuse exactly what being pro-choice entails.

    It dictates that a woman has the right to terminate a *pregnancy*, yes? To evict a foetus from her body, because it's her body and she should be able to choose what she does with it.

    It does not necessarily follow that she should be allowed to choose the fate of that foetus. So... If a woman is 30 weeks pregnant, a pro-choice stance could allow her to induce labour, but not to kill the foetus or to deny it medical assistance after birth.

    As for how this logic applies to the OP, a 19 week old foetus cannot live outside the womb, therefore if I'm to be pro-choice I have to respect that not all choices will sit well with me :/
    I do agree that once that baby is outside of her body, she has no rights to kill it. I think she has the right to induce prematurely, but if it DOESN'T die from that, then that's too bad. She had the choice about her body. That part is done. Once she's got a living being seperate from her own body, she has no right to just go, "yep, kill it." Anymore than I have with my daughter today.

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SassyMummy For This Useful Post:

    MonsterMoosMum  (29-04-2013),RobinSparkles  (29-04-2013)

  4. #243
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,290
    Thanks
    2,377
    Thanked
    903
    Reviews
    72
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SassyMummy View Post
    I believe the mother's life should ALWAYS take precedence over an unborn baby in the eyes of the law.

    You know what happens when that isn't the case? Women are imprisoned for their birth choices if someone else deems that those choices MAY be detrimental to the baby (and this is all a matter of opinion - nobody can foresee the future, so whether or not it's harmful or not can only be seen after it's already happened).

    A woman is not an incubator, and she should never ever be treated like one.

    Because a baby is INSIDE a woman, because it relies on her to continue living, then there is no way that BOTH can have equal rights. So... one has to lose some rights in order for the other to be given rights. If we take away the rights of a pregnant mother in preference of her baby, what we're saying is that women are lesser if they fall pregnant... because we are stripping them of rights they otherwise had to their own body, just because they have a baby in there. We're saying pregnant women do not deserve the same rights as anyone else has to their own bodies. That, to me, is revolting.

    It would be nice if we could grant rights to the unborn, but the only way to do that is to decide that a grown, existing woman is worth less than it is... and that's never going to be okay. It makes women little more than incubators.

    The MOMENT that baby takes its first breath, it gets all the rights in the world... but until that point, it is inside another's body, and the owner of that body deserves to decide what happens with it.

    Don't think for a second that this means I am happy when I hear of late-term abortions, "just because." I don't understand it. I don't understand why anyone would just go, "yeah, I'd rather not after all actually..." and abort at that stage. There are instances where it makes sense - medical issues with either mother or baby, severe circumstances, etc. But mostly, to me, if you're having a late term abortion, you're still having to have that baby removed from your body... so you still need to give birth to it, so why not just give birth to it and give it away to someone who wants it? If it can survive outside of the uterus and you're going to have to give birth to it anyway, I don't understand why people wouldn't do that instead... but I'm NOT someone who has ever considered a late-term abortion. I haven't experienced the things others have. I don't have their ethics and morals and values. Therefore, I acknowledge that while it makes no sense to me, and I believe there's a better alternative, not everyone is me, with my way of thinking... and expecting everyone to live according to what I deem acceptable is just as stupid as everyone living according to the way the Westborough Baptist Church deems acceptable, the way Sharia Law deems acceptable, the way oppressive China deems acceptable.

    It's not really my place to tell everyone how they should live, and what they should do with their bodies, regardless of how I feel on the matter... and likewise I don't want anyone else thinking they have the right to decide what I do with my own uterus or its contents either.

    And it is so very hard to talk about when life "begins," especially when you're talking with women who have lost babies. There's no way you can say, "life before birth doesn't matter," when you've seen women's hearts break for going through a miscarriage, or having a stillbirth. To me it's not about that... when or not life actually begins. It's about the fact that for the unborn to have all these rights, then the pregnant woman has to lose rights that she would otherwise have (the right to make decisions regarding her own body and its contents) at any other stage in her life.

    It's just never going to be something I think is right or fair or just... so instead, I acknowledge that women are going to use the pro-choice sentiment to do horrific things to their bodies, to the contents of their bodies... but that this stance is still important regardless, because without it, we have condemned many women who WOULDN'T do things even staunch pro-choicers would feel sick at the thought of... there are so many more women who use abortions "properly," (for want of a better word) than there are who abuse the right by doing things most others would call heinous.
    This is what I have been trying and failing to articulate 100%.

  5. #244
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    10,012
    Thanks
    14,124
    Thanked
    7,612
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    Every single thing that Sassy said. Awesome posts!

  6. #245
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    1,272
    Thanks
    946
    Thanked
    1,022
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mama and her little bear View Post
    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_...n_of_pregnancy

    As far as I know in abortion (not induction) the baby isn't given a chance to try and survive
    Thanks. I actually think I may bow out of this thread now. I am finding the discussion interesting but all the late term discussion and a part of a post earlier in the day are putting images in my head I'm having a hard time with.

    Thanks for the great discussion though ladies.

  7. #246
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    At the beach
    Posts
    10,495
    Thanks
    1,430
    Thanked
    9,003
    Reviews
    3
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 17/10/14100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by RobinSparkles View Post
    This is what I have been trying and failing to articulate 100%.
    You've articulated it fine. I've realised I don't agree with it (after a certain point and for non medical reasons). We don't allow women currently to terminate beyond a certain point in time and the balance seems to work. I can't agree with the position stated by you and sassy and I don't believe the drastic consequences outlined occur because women aren't allowed to terminate up to birth.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Sonja For This Useful Post:


  9. #247
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    At the beach
    Posts
    10,495
    Thanks
    1,430
    Thanked
    9,003
    Reviews
    3
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 17/10/14100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirst33 View Post
    Thanks. I actually think I may bow out of this thread now. I am finding the discussion interesting but all the late term discussion and a part of a post earlier in the day are putting images in my head I'm having a hard time with.

    Thanks for the great discussion though ladies.
    Yeah I think I'm out too. I have enjoyed the education.

  10. #248
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    599
    Thanks
    362
    Thanked
    413
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirst33 View Post
    I'm just confused as to if you can even 'abort' a healthy baby that is old enough to live outside your body? Once you reach a certain gestation your only choice is to be induced or a c-section, so if the baby is healthy enough and old enough to live outside the mothers body then it would survive the birth and be born alive... And then if the mother didn't want it she would sign over her rights??? How can you abort a baby that is old enough and healthy enough to live outside you? I am sure a dr has a responsibility to protect the baby's life at that point? Am I being naive?
    the babies life is terminated before it is able to take a breath, either with partial birth, lethal cardic injection when the baby ids in utero, before labour has begun, or with a D & E (which I won't describe not to cause offence but it is awful to imagine it happening to a viable baby). Again we prefer to be ignorant to what actually goes on - but the only way for a healthy viable baby to be aborted is for its life to be artificially terminated by the doctor (as I already explained earlier).

  11. #249
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    townsville
    Posts
    2,816
    Thanks
    1,570
    Thanked
    1,277
    Reviews
    2
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    Yep said my piece and reading everyone's opinions and stances has been enlightening I'm going to bid farewell to this thread now


    Sent from a magical mobile bubhub device in a galaxy far far away

  12. #250
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    599
    Thanks
    362
    Thanked
    413
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mama and her little bear View Post
    I think people get confused because in medically required termination the common method is early induction and then allowing baby to pass on it's own
    I think you're right, and people would rather not know what actually happens to a viable baby that is terminated late term because it is too distressing to hear the truth. I find it sad that we a a society would support something we have little or no knowledge of - how can you be pro choice for a late term abortion if you have no idea of how that abortion actually occurs? Some people have no idea How the babies life is terminated when induced labour would mean that they would survive and it would be an unsuccessful abortion, so the dr needs to take measures to ensure that a healthy baby is no longer so. Google abortion procedures, even google image it, and then come back and say that you are 100% pro choice.


 

Similar Threads

  1. Curious about gender selection
    By Lozie in forum General Parenting Tips, Advice & Chat
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-01-2014, 09:21
  2. Xanax + alcohol *possibly distressing*
    By AndrewTheEmu in forum Battling addiction?
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-08-2012, 21:46

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
free weekly newsletters | sign up now!
who are these people who write great posts? meet our hubbub authors!
Learn how you can contribute to the hubbub!

reviews
learn how you can become a reviewer!

competitions

forum - chatting now
christmas gift guidesee all Red Stocking
Springfree Trampoline
Give the Ultimate Christmas Gift Springfree Trampoline
The World's Safest Trampoline™ is now also the world's first Smart Trampoline™. Sensors on the mat detect your every move and your jumps control fun, educational and active games on tablet. Secure the Ultimate Christmas Gift today!
sales & new stuffsee all
Bub Hub Sales Listing
HAVING A SALE? Let parents know about it with a Bub Hub Sales listing. Listings are featured on our well trafficked Sales Page + selected randomly to appear on EVERY page
featured supporter
ProSwim
ProSwim Rostrevor runs learn to swim classes for children and adults. Lessons are run during the Summer months (Oct-Mar). Our indoor centre at Plympton Park has lessons all year round, including school holidays.
gotcha
X

Pregnant for the first-time?

Not sure where to start? We can help!

Our Insider Programs for pregnancy first-timers will lead you step-by-step through the 14 Pregnancy Must Dos!