+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 70
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0
    Reviews
    0

    Default Why you probably shouldn't get an Ultrasound during pregnancy re: Swedish studies

    Hi everyone!

    I am posting this to see if anyone else has made a similar decisions as me ie. to by choice decide against getting an ultrasound due to the health risks it poses to the foetus/baby according to some well designed and documented Swedish studies/research papers.

    According to these kinds of studies the benefits of getting the ultrasound doesn't outweigh the risk of getting it done for the developing foetus in the vast majority of cases as it has the potential to cause the baby minor brain damage, general tissue damage and potentially damage DNA.

    This is because ultra high energy sound waves can heat and damage the tissues (much like you don't leave a mobile phone next to anything living too long due to the radiation except this stuff is higher energy- ultra high frequency) disrupt the functioning of the tissues and kill cells, cause bubbles to form in the fluid around or inside your baby etc. and other hazardous effects, especially the risk gets higher the longer its applied.

    I really wanted to see the baby and my partner really wanted to get the 20wk check for gross abnormalities. But I have held out for the sake of the baby. I have come to realise to none of these scans are necessary for most people and also a multi-million dollar industry that the doctors assist in pushing (which most people are more than happy to go along with, I know I would be if I didn't know the risks as I am dying to see the baby).

    I also have to acknowledge that children have been being developed and born (mostly healthy) for as long as humans have existed and that foetuses with gross or major defects (even sometimes those with minor problems) tend to miscarry as the per the course of nature anyway and that I should try to have a little faith that if my baby continues to grow that I hope/pray they will be healthy.

    I also pointed out to my husband that the most commonly advised 'option' if they do find an abnormality on an ultrasound is to abort, and I explained to him I would not abort anyway. I feel like as a man he can't quite perhaps at least in his case understand that I am growing this child in my body and I would not deliberately harm it for any reason and I feel like he trivialises it. I get worried enough if I eat badly for a few days or lean the wrong way on the foetus let alone considering aborting the child because a blurry scan said they were not quite the 'right shape or length' here or there within a few mm.

    For one thing half the time they "find" these abnormalities they turn out to be wrong and the baby is fine anyway. Let's face it, it's pretty obvious they can't tell a whole lot from a blurry old scan.

    Secondly they only pick up things like down-syndrome 50% of the time accurately those are really bad odds for the risk of potentially harming a foetus just to find out there is a 50% chance they are OK or not.

    Also if you have to know the sex, you can actually get a blood test that will tell you this, and as early as 7 weeks. No ultrasound required and much more accurate.

    Lastly, if anybody out there makes the same decision as me don't let anyone guilt you into changeing your mind or make you feel like you are 'odd' for not doing what most people do these days because the doctor tells them to or because everyone else is doing it.

    Think about that they also told women that X-raying the foetus was TOTALLY 100% safe, they told women this for nearly 50 YEARS. It wasn't safe, it gives the child a four times higher chance of getting childhood leakaemia and other illnesses. It took a determined (female might I add ) research scientist her whole career to have her findings that she spent most of her life dedicated to, accepted. Another research scientist paid by the industry actually spent years publishing papers to counter her claims and to the other researchers horror she watched the leakaemia rates in children and witnessed many children 'inexplicably' die for another 20-30 years after she knew the truth of the matter.

    Think about it, these ultra high frequency ultrasounds are strong enough to penetrate flesh just like x-rays. You don't need to be a research scientist to know that ultrasounds HAVE NOT BEEN PROVEN SAFE.

    If in doubt, protect your baby better than the same establishment that previously told you to have multiple x-rays of the foetus to 'check it was OK' in the very recent past.

    Not trying to guilt people who have already or will do the ultrasound, just trying to give those you are undecided some information that is rarely talked about and somewhat hard to find to give the the power to make a more informed decision.

    Good luck everyone not matter what choice you make (mother knows best I say ).

    Have a great day and thanks for taking the time to read.

    Mel
    Last edited by Mod-pegasus; 04-04-2013 at 11:45.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    10,012
    Thanks
    14,124
    Thanked
    7,612
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    You really need to post the link to the study when you put up things like this.

  3. The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to beebs For This Useful Post:

    atomicmama  (04-04-2013),Atropos  (04-04-2013),CakeyLoaf  (04-04-2013),Californication  (04-04-2013),dancingchipmunk  (04-04-2013),DarcyJ  (04-04-2013),delirium  (04-04-2013),Disbride  (25-04-2013),GM01  (04-04-2013),haveheart  (04-04-2013),αληθη  (04-04-2013),jenjenOo  (04-04-2013),LaDiDah  (04-04-2013),lambjam  (04-04-2013),MissMuppet  (04-04-2013),NancyBlackett  (04-04-2013),NurseAnni  (04-04-2013),tjewell  (04-04-2013),waitinghoping  (04-04-2013),Whimsical Mama  (04-04-2013),Wise Enough  (04-04-2013)

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    1,914
    Thanks
    364
    Thanked
    1,502
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    I decided to "minimise" the number of ultrasounds - i.e. no dating scan and no extra scans at the OB, but I still had the 12 week scan, the 20 week scan and a scan when I went into early labour at 24 weeks.

    The scan done at 24 weeks saved both mine and my babies life. It discovered a VERY large clot behind the placenta which put me at high risk of abruption and I wasn't allowed to leave the hospital. I abrupted at 25+4. Before the scan I was told I would be able to go home after a night of observation, if I was at home when the abruption happened both me and my daughter would have died. Not could have, would have.

    So, I will never refuse scans outright - the benefits outweigh any potential risks, in my opinion.

    In addition, when my DD was in the NICU she had scans of her heart (3 times), her brain (4 times), her liver and other organs, x-rays of her chest (a bunch of times). So far, she is amazingly healthy.

  5. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to GM01 For This Useful Post:

    angelini  (04-04-2013),atomicmama  (04-04-2013),Atropos  (04-04-2013),bokkie_wotwot  (04-04-2013),CakeyLoaf  (04-04-2013),dancingchipmunk  (04-04-2013),DarcyJ  (04-04-2013),αληθη  (04-04-2013),Kimnus  (04-04-2013),LifeInShadesOfGrey  (04-04-2013),MrsSS  (04-04-2013),NurseAnni  (04-04-2013),Two Sweetpeas  (04-04-2013),wannawannabe  (04-04-2013),Wise Enough  (04-04-2013)

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    5,276
    Thanks
    3,697
    Thanked
    3,090
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    There are so many inaccuracies in your post, OP.

    Your stats are, without exception, incorrect.

    Ultrasounds are important, and detect many conditions that can be treated. They are also able to detect things that may be dangerous to the mother and child if left undealt with.

    Your advice is irresponsible.

  7. The Following 25 Users Say Thank You to Guest654 For This Useful Post:

    Amiedoll  (19-12-2013),atomicmama  (04-04-2013),Atropos  (04-04-2013),beebs  (04-04-2013),CakeyLoaf  (04-04-2013),Californication  (04-04-2013),CatesBean  (04-04-2013),dancingchipmunk  (04-04-2013),DarcyJ  (04-04-2013),delirium  (04-04-2013),FiveInTheBed  (04-04-2013),FluffyDucks  (04-04-2013),GlitterFarts  (04-04-2013),jenjenOo  (04-04-2013),kezanazz  (04-04-2013),LaDiDah  (04-04-2013),lambjam  (04-04-2013),LifeInShadesOfGrey  (04-04-2013),mamoru  (04-04-2013),MissMuppet  (04-04-2013),NancyBlackett  (04-04-2013),NurseAnni  (04-04-2013),Purple Lily  (04-04-2013),SJG  (04-04-2013),waitinghoping  (04-04-2013)

  8. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    8,806
    Thanks
    7,267
    Thanked
    9,720
    Reviews
    5
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by beebs View Post
    You really need to post the link to the study when you put up things like this.
    This. You've made some pretty big claims, I'd be interested to see you back them. Also you said defects shown on US lead only to suggestions to abort- this is just plain wrong and a potentially dangerous statement. Sometimes defects show that mean immediate medical intervention will be required at birth- heart probs etc, and they allow the mother to ensure she births at the hospital with an appropriate medical team on standby to treat the baby at birth, potentially saving its life.
    ETA- I just read your other post where you say you are expecting your first, and not due til October, so doesn't that only make you about 3 months pregnant or less? I can understand not wanting a dating scan and even opting not to have the 12 week scan, but the 20 week one (that you say you have "held out" from having even though you wouldn't yet be due for it) is important and as others have said, potentially life saving. I hope you read some more research, there are numerous studies showing how safe it is to have a scan done.
    Last edited by Atropos; 04-04-2013 at 09:49.

  9. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Atropos For This Useful Post:

    beebs  (04-04-2013),dancingchipmunk  (04-04-2013),DarcyJ  (04-04-2013),Guest654  (04-04-2013),αληθη  (04-04-2013),Kirst33  (04-04-2013),lambjam  (04-04-2013),LifeInShadesOfGrey  (04-04-2013),NurseAnni  (04-04-2013),Two Sweetpeas  (04-04-2013)

  10. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Where the wild things are
    Posts
    7,022
    Thanks
    106
    Thanked
    686
    Reviews
    15
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Ultrasound quite possibly saved my daughter's life, so I will be having ultrasounds for subsequent pregnancies.

    Also, I would like to read this study

    Sent from my HTC One XL using BubHub

  11. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Pregnor For This Useful Post:

    Atropos  (04-04-2013),beebs  (04-04-2013),dancingchipmunk  (04-04-2013),Guest654  (04-04-2013),Kimnus  (04-04-2013),Kirst33  (04-04-2013),LifeInShadesOfGrey  (04-04-2013)

  12. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    55
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    9
    Reviews
    0
    Ultrasound saved both my boys lives (different pregnancies) and I think this is a load of pollywaffle otherwise why would leading obstetricians recommend them!?

  13. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to love05 For This Useful Post:

    Atropos  (04-04-2013),Guest654  (04-04-2013),Kirst33  (04-04-2013),LifeInShadesOfGrey  (04-04-2013)

  14. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    8,806
    Thanks
    7,267
    Thanked
    9,720
    Reviews
    5
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Double post.

  15. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,248
    Thanks
    489
    Thanked
    1,263
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    This post make me so angry. It's disgusting people are allowed to post such incorrect and false information on the Internet that could potentially risk others lives.


    For everyone reading, do not follow this posters advice!!!

  16. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to wannawannabe For This Useful Post:

    Amiedoll  (19-12-2013),DarcyJ  (04-04-2013),jenjenOo  (04-04-2013),Kirst33  (04-04-2013),mousky  (29-04-2014),Nmgb  (04-04-2013)

  17. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4,589
    Thanks
    1,303
    Thanked
    2,569
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Do you have anything to back up your claims? They seem rather far fetched.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Lincolns mummy For This Useful Post:

    beebs  (04-04-2013)


 

Similar Threads

  1. At how many weeks gestation can you rule out partial molar pregnancy by ultrasound?
    By Noty in forum Pregnancy Tests & Help / Support with Results
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 30-01-2013, 20:30
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 30-10-2012, 13:26
  3. Any early pregnancy ultrasound places open on a Sunday??
    By RubyRaspberry in forum Pregnancy & Birth General Chat
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 28-05-2012, 13:10

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
free weekly newsletters | sign up now!
who are these people who write great posts? meet our hubbub authors!
Learn how you can contribute to the hubbub!

reviews
learn how you can become a reviewer!

competitions

forum - chatting now
christmas gift guidesee all Red Stocking
Springfree Trampoline
Give the Ultimate Christmas Gift Springfree Trampoline
The World's Safest Trampoline™ is now also the world's first Smart Trampoline™. Sensors on the mat detect your every move and your jumps control fun, educational and active games on tablet. Secure the Ultimate Christmas Gift today!
sales & new stuffsee all
CarmelsBeautySecrets
Growing your own natural nails is easy. Years ago, I devised a simple and very effective technique which really helps boosts the nails' growth in as little as three days! And most importantly keeps them that way.
featured supporter
Ro and Co
Ro and Co kids cooking classes and parties are a fantastic way for children to experiment with food. The classes and parties are designed to be both educational and fun, giving your child the skills they need to be confident and creative in the kitchen.
gotcha
X

Pregnant for the first-time?

Not sure where to start? We can help!

Our Insider Programs for pregnancy first-timers will lead you step-by-step through the 14 Pregnancy Must Dos!