Hi everyone. My partner recently had two separate semen analyses, the second one at the advice of Repromed. The first showed his morphology to be 25% and the second (the one done by Repromed) was only 4%. They said this is more likely to be accurate as their scientists deal exclusively in sperm, so to speak, and are more expert in determining what is a normal shape. According to the world health organisation 4% is normal anyway (and we also went to Flinders Reproductive Medicine who agreed) but the doctor at Repromed said this is low and there is little chance of natural conception. She recommended ICSI.
I am confused at being given different parameters by different "experts" and am suspicious that Repromed are giving us the worst case scenario so that we buy their (most expensive) product. Not sure if I am just being cynical and this really is cause for concern. My partner would rather try less invasive treatments initially and I tend to agree. Can anyone give me any clarification around this and whether 4% morphology really is such a big concern?