It's totally wrong!
It's totally wrong!
Plus I believe she wasn't blatantly sunbathing either, more changing. What's the poor girl to do, never use the toilet near a window in case someone with a long distance lens can see in?
Just because they are famous/royalty doesn't mean they are not entitled to the same rights as us!!!
I think it's wrong what the photographers did.
Of course, she lost the right to any sort of privacy (including on private property) when she signed those marriage papers. Along with giving us the right to publish half naked photos ago. Completely forgot that being a member of the royal family meant you lost of all rights to privacy.
TBH I don't think magazines should be allowed to publish photos of anyone (royal or celeb) unless they have express permission from said person. But that's a whole other debate.
Anyway I think the photos are definitely wrong but I don't really think they should be surprised by them. I would never EVER take my clothes off outside or near a window if I was in her position. It's not hard really, I don't think I've been nude outdoors since puberty!
Plus at the end of the day they're only boobs! We all have them. People sunbathe topless all the time. Glad the uk tabloids have done the honourable thing (for once) and not printed them
Yes at least she wasn't flashing them near a school
The uk tabloids didn't print them only because they love their royal family more than their trashy gossip.
If it was anyone else they would have printed them.
Can't believe the comments in the thread btw, the poor girl. Should she never have a shower naked either? Because she can pretty much expect to be photographed wherever the hell she is!
The british tabloids printed the shots of Harry in Vegas ...
Pregnant for the first-time?
Not sure where to start? We can help!
Our Insider Programs for pregnancy first-timers will lead you step-by-step through the 14 Pregnancy Must Dos!