Maybe read the RACP (Royal Australasian College of Physicians) policy statement on circumcision:
"After reviewing the currently available evidence, the RACP believes that the frequency of diseases modifiable by circumcision, the level of protection offered by circumcision and the complication rates of circumcision do not warrant routine infant circumcision in Australia and New Zealand".
From an ethical perspective, they discuss the role a parent has in making appropriate decisions for their children, and as a person who completely and utterly respect my sons autonomy, this part really stands out to me:
"Informed parental consent should include the possibility that the ethical principle of autonomy may be better fulfilled by deferring the circumcision to adolescence with the young man consenting on his own behalf".
These statements do not come from a biased website created by anti circ individuals. It is an *unbiased* medical perspective.
It is your son's penis. Let him choose.