I think I could take Zoo readers a litle more seriously if they said "hang on, I enjoy this magazine but this is just insensitive". If a magazine I enjoyed suddenly decided to have a campaign targeting a minority group in such a callous way I wouldn't be sending my money their way until the situation was rectified.
2. I can't think of an over 18 who volunteers photos of their hooters for men to gawk at as being vulnerable. Other words come to mind and vulnerable is not one of them.
3. I can understand how genuine refugees may be offended: this is bad taste. To be honest though ones that would be offended probably wouldn't be reading zoo.
If you want to sign the petition go ahead, I can see why you would. At the same time it's my right to not sign the petition. No amount of veiled insults will change my mind.
There was no mention of non-genuine refugees - they specifically mentioned asylum seekers escaping persecution.
Pregnant for the first-time?
Not sure where to start? We can help!
Our Insider Programs for pregnancy first-timers will lead you step-by-step through the 14 Pregnancy Must Dos!