+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 51
  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,222
    Thanks
    1,146
    Thanked
    425
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    i live in perth, have swum with sharks numerous times (diving) and studied them at university. i think they are amazing...

    i makes me feel ill to think they will suddenly be taken off the protected list and be opened up for hunting. so many sharks are already killed by commercial fishing i actually refuse to eat shark for that reason and that they are a slow growing species that takes a long time to recover.

    every time i went diving, i knew i was taking a risk. same thing when i hop in the car, i am taking a risk.
    if we are truly 'scared' why not spend money on researching shark repellant devices.
    or start accepting we are responsible for the risks we take.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to halloweendee For This Useful Post:

    Bonkers  (17-07-2012),share a book  (16-07-2012)

  3. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    8,794
    Thanks
    3,395
    Thanked
    3,081
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    They had shark nets at Alma Bay and one of the beaches between Townsville and Cairns. Funny as anything though, there were stinger nets at the beach with shark nets just a little way out, but there was a 6ft crocodile sitting just near where the stinger net was on the beach. Hmm, if we get past the crocodile, provided there are no others, we can swim safely in the stinger net. Nobody was swimming in the stinger net, but heaps of people were in the river that ran off the ocean

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to share a book For This Useful Post:

    Bonkers  (17-07-2012)

  5. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Calamvale
    Posts
    111
    Thanks
    61
    Thanked
    25
    Reviews
    0
    200% NO!!!
    As previous posters have said its their territory their home...

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Beck87 For This Useful Post:

    Bonkers  (17-07-2012)

  7. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Perth WA
    Posts
    2,068
    Thanks
    1,637
    Thanked
    544
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Definitely not! I am terrified of sharks however I don't believe they should be hunted either for revenge or commercially.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to MamaC For This Useful Post:

    Bonkers  (17-07-2012)

  9. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,481
    Thanks
    249
    Thanked
    152
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Something has to be done. Killing every shark is not going to solve the problem. We need more patrols, more tagging, and yes with proper control and limiting/sizing according to breeding and research the sharks should be taken off the endangered species list if it is validated there are the numbers to do so.

    I don't agree to the 'chance' comparison of you are more likely to die in a car crash, you are more likely to drown etc etc. Yes we might be, but we also put in effort to decrease these risks. If fatal shark attacks increase then the ratios will be reversed.

    I know this part of the coast line where this happened very well. Before longlining was banned there were few sightings of sharks in the waters close to the beaches. Now there is plenty. There are many first hand experiences of large sharks trying to attack boats not only small boats but large commercials.

    I can see the point of view of people who say we are going into their territory. Well so are we when we grow crops to feed our population. We also like to cull the kangaroo's and poison the rabbits who then eat our food. Dingo's are culled. My point being we cull animals on land, land which was previously 'their' territory.
    Last edited by patsmum; 16-07-2012 at 23:33.

  10. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,719
    Thanks
    1,042
    Thanked
    396
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    No way.....

    Sent from my GT-I9100T using BubHub

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to ShanandBoc For This Useful Post:

    Bonkers  (17-07-2012)

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    8,794
    Thanks
    3,395
    Thanked
    3,081
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by patsmum View Post
    Something has to be done. Killing every shark is not going to solve the problem. We need more patrols, more tagging, and yes with proper control and limiting/sizing according to breeding and research the sharks should be taken off the endangered species list if it is validated there are the numbers to do so.

    I don't agree to the 'chance' comparison of you are more likely to die in a car crash, you are more likely to drown etc etc. Yes we might be, but we also put in effort to decrease these risks. If fatal shark attacks increase then the ratios will be reversed.

    I know this part of the coast line where this happened very well. Before longlining was banned there were few sightings of sharks in the waters close to the beaches. Now there is plenty. There are many first hand experiences of large sharks trying to attack boats not only small boats but large commercials.

    I can see the point of view of people who say we are going into their territory. Well so are we when we grow crops to feed our population. We also like to cull the kangaroo's and poison the rabbits who then eat our food. Dingo's are culled. My point being we cull animals on land, land which was previously 'their' territory.
    I do not agree with any mass culling.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    7,668
    Thanks
    5,719
    Thanked
    3,068
    Reviews
    25
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by share a book View Post
    I do not agree with any mass culling.
    Exactley, Its not just Sharks I dont agree with any mass culling either.

    Sent from my U8510 using BubHub

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Purple Lily For This Useful Post:

    Bonkers  (17-07-2012)

  15. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,700
    Thanks
    358
    Thanked
    503
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by patsmum View Post
    Something has to be done. Killing every shark is not going to solve the problem. We need more patrols, more tagging, and yes with proper control and limiting/sizing according to breeding and research the sharks should be taken off the endangered species list if it is validated there are the numbers to do so.

    I don't agree to the 'chance' comparison of you are more likely to die in a car crash, you are more likely to drown etc etc. Yes we might be, but we also put in effort to decrease these risks. If fatal shark attacks increase then the ratios will be reversed.

    I know this part of the coast line where this happened very well. Before longlining was banned there were few sightings of sharks in the waters close to the beaches. Now there is plenty. There are many first hand experiences of large sharks trying to attack boats not only small boats but large commercials.

    I can see the point of view of people who say we are going into their territory. Well so are we when we grow crops to feed our population. We also like to cull the kangaroo's and poison the rabbits who then eat our food. Dingo's are culled. My point being we cull animals on land, land which was previously 'their' territory.
    Rabbits and kangaroos are a pest whose numbers have FLOURISHED thanks to humans, if they are not culled they destroy vegetation and will *eventually* starve themselves.

    We 'take precautions' with cars etc yes well we can simply NOT swim in the ocean.

    A shark sees a thing waving around in the water, they think it is a fish or a seal so they try to eat it.

    I dont agree with the nets either, dolphins and other non 'killer' marine life die regularly in them.

    You go into the jungle, you *might*pay get attacked by a lion etc

    You go into the out back, you *might*pay fall victim to a snake or a spider etc.

    You go into the ocean, you *might * fall victim to a shark.

    Thats the simple facts, if you dont want to take that risk then stay on the land.

    Sent from my MB526 using BubHub

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to GuestMember For This Useful Post:

    Bonkers  (17-07-2012)

  17. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    8,806
    Thanks
    7,267
    Thanked
    9,720
    Reviews
    5
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    The day sharks begin attacking people in their homes is the day we should look at hunting them. As it is, we go into their homes, we are fair game.
    We need to look at why they are coming closer to shore. I think it will show that yet again, humans are to blame, with excessive fishing and environmental changes we have wrought.

  18. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Atropos For This Useful Post:

    Bonkers  (17-07-2012),Chocolate All Gone Now  (20-07-2012),cluckcluck  (17-07-2012)


 

Similar Threads

  1. SHARK MENACE: Licence to kill sharks close to swim beaches
    By headoverfeet in forum Social Issues
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 30-09-2012, 21:38

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
free weekly newsletters | sign up now!
who are these people who write great posts? meet our hubbub authors!
Learn how you can contribute to the hubbub!

reviews
learn how you can become a reviewer!

competitions

forum - chatting now
christmas gift guidesee all Red Stocking
Pyjamas.com.au
With so many gorgeous brands and styles for every season, our pyjamas, nighties, robes, sleepsuits and sleeping bags are lovely for lights out and perfect for lazy days. Get 10% off first order using code bubhub. Be quick offer ends 31/12/16.
sales & new stuffsee all
Wendys Music School Melbourne
Wondering about Music Lessons? FREE 30 minute ASSESSMENT. Find out if your child is ready! Piano from age 3 years & Guitar, Singing, Drums, Violin from age 5. Lessons available for all ages. 35+ years experience. Structured program.
Use referral 'bubhub' when booking
featured supporter
The Fix Program Sydney CBD and Broadway
Pregnancy and women's health physio, pregnancy and new mum Pilates classes taught by our physios for you and bub. Pregnancy back and pelvic pain. Also, we treat postnatal and women of all ages. Incontinence, prolapse, sexual and pelvic pain.
gotcha
X

Pregnant for the first-time?

Not sure where to start? We can help!

Our Insider Programs for pregnancy first-timers will lead you step-by-step through the 14 Pregnancy Must Dos!