Not needed??? It protects against 75% of cervical cancers! See - now this is what I personally find really weird about all the anti vaxx stuff.
"it only protects against 75% of cancers", "it only protects against 85%-59% of whooping cough" "MMR isn't 100% effective" (yeah - only 95-95% effective) What a very strange excuse not to vaccinate. I mean - by all means don't vaccinate. But to say that 75% protection is somehow bad??
Uh oh - I feel another coming on
I don't think people who get it without knowing much about it are stupid. I think from the advertising it would be fairly easy to think it is a cancer vaccine. You hear it all the time.
I personally am not anti vax anyway. We are non vaxxers at this stage but always open to hearing everything and re evaluating. I have never tried to push any anti vax agenda and I can see the benefits too
That's if you were talking to me!
Last edited by Ffrenchknickers; 16-07-2012 at 17:56.
Both up to date
In some people obviously it isn't needed (like if you are older and already sexually active etc). But if this vaccine prevents 3 out of 4 women getting cervical cancer then I can only see it as a great thing. My boys will deffo be getting it!
Pregnant for the first-time?
Not sure where to start? We can help!
Our Insider Programs for pregnancy first-timers will lead you step-by-step through the 14 Pregnancy Must Dos!