+ Reply to Thread
Page 14 of 25 FirstFirst ... 4121314151624 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 248
  1. #131
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    529
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked
    20
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    The only reason this magazine cover looks "bad" is cause the child is standing making him look bigger I'm sure if she was nursing her three year old the usual way there wouldn't be such a reaction it's obviously done to provoke reaction by the advertiser namely time magazine, I personally don't see anything wrong with breast feeding a three year old.. And to those saying its disgusting.. I guess hanging a three year old off a cows udder is more natural and preferred? What ever..
    What upsets me the most is the phrase are u mom enough? Basically assuming that people who don't breast feed arnt? Yet again sick American propagander yielding advertising... Glad I don't buy time magazine
    Last edited by bimbie; 12-05-2012 at 08:41.

  2. #132
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    124
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    31
    Reviews
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by MissWinter View Post
    I am p!ssed that purely based on the cover I am NOT "mum enough" because I couldn't feed my daughter

    Sent from my GT-I9100T using BubHub
    It's bloody pitiful that there is such crap out there to make women feel like this. Society sucks! All that should matter is the way a child is loved, not the way a child is fed!

  3. #133
    BabushkaMumma's Avatar
    BabushkaMumma is offline Mothering with my whole heart as thats what my girls have given me.
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,330
    Thanks
    199
    Thanked
    355
    Reviews
    3
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    She didn't choose the front cover. Time Magazines editor would have. A million photos would've been taken that day. That cover would've been one of them.

    That persons job is to sell magazines - they are not there to promote extended BF, AP or anything else.

    It's sad that people are directing the anger towards this woman and her 'pose' and the appearance of her face and not at the media agency controlling the information!

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to BabushkaMumma For This Useful Post:

    FindMyLunch  (12-05-2012)

  5. #134
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    12,711
    Thanks
    9,559
    Thanked
    12,691
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 posts
    Awards:
    Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 9/1/15Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 7/11/14Busiest Member of the Week - week ended 3/10/14100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by BabushkaMumma View Post
    She didn't choose the front cover. Time Magazines editor would have. A million photos would've been taken that day. That cover would've been one of them.

    That persons job is to sell magazines - they are not there to promote extended BF, AP or anything else.

    It's sad that people are directing the anger towards this woman and her 'pose' and the appearance of her face and not at the media agency controlling the information!
    This woman went in front of the camera with her boob, toddler and full make up. She knew what she was getting into.

  6. #135
    BabushkaMumma's Avatar
    BabushkaMumma is offline Mothering with my whole heart as thats what my girls have given me.
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,330
    Thanks
    199
    Thanked
    355
    Reviews
    3
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    ^^ She sure did Vicpark. She still would not have had the ability to choose that (or any) particular photos for publication - so she probably didn't know the uproar it would cause.

    My point is - TIME chose the most provocative photo of the shoot - they control what you need to see.

    Believe me, if she didn't wear makeup or get dressed up she would've been vilified too.

    I've done a professional photo shoot of me breastfeeding my toddler for public use so I am aware of all that goes behind it and the fact i had no dramatic licence for choice after the fact.

    but so many of the previous comments are directing their animosity to the position she's standing in, how her face looks, they are labeling her as sexy.

    It's a shame because this is a mother doing something totally normal In a photo styled in a fashion that is appropriate to sell an international magazine.

    The photo is not designed to promote extended breastfeeding or feeding at all.
    Last edited by BabushkaMumma; 12-05-2012 at 09:29.

  7. #136
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,363
    Thanks
    467
    Thanked
    357
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    I would be interested to read the article and what is projected within.

    The image on the front was clearly chosen to spark controversy, and whilst I personally wouldn't bf until that age - they certainly didn't do any justice for those that choose to.

  8. #137
    headoverfeet's Avatar
    headoverfeet is offline The truth will set you free, but first it will **** you off. -Gloria Steinem
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    18,954
    Thanks
    3,142
    Thanked
    4,892
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    Quote Originally Posted by VicPark View Post
    Regardless of whether or not you approve of extended breastfeeding:
    What type of woman allows such a photo of her toddler to be published?

    A money Hungry attention seeking mommy with issues. That kid will have to grow up one day and I wonder if he will be pleased that the photo is out there.
    I don't get your hatred for this photo? 'what type of woman' seriously if you don't like it, put a blanket on your head.

  9. #138
    headoverfeet's Avatar
    headoverfeet is offline The truth will set you free, but first it will **** you off. -Gloria Steinem
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    18,954
    Thanks
    3,142
    Thanked
    4,892
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    Awards:
    100 Posts in a week
    Here's an interview with the woman in the photo

    http://healthland.time.com/2012/05/1...-lynne-grumet/


    MARTIN SCHOELLER FOR TIME
    Jamie Lynne Grumet, 26, is a proponent of attachment parenting
    Jamie Lynne Grumet, a 26-year-old mother of two in Los Angeles, is on the cover of TIME this week breast-feeding her son Aram, who turns 4 next month. Kate Pickert, the author of the accompanying cover story, “The Man Who Remade Motherhood,” spoke with Grumet about attachment parenting, adoption and breast-feeding, topics Grumet writes about on her blog, I Am Not the Babysitter.

    It’s clear from your blog that you’re into attachment parenting. Are you a fan of Dr. Bill Sears?
    He’s great. I’ve read all his books. He has a very gentle spirit, and I find what he’s saying to be nonjudgmental and relevant to what’s happening today and what we’re finding out about some of the issues that are popping up with our children’s health. I feel like he really is doing this because he knows this is best. And the way he does it is graceful and educating rather than condemning.

    (PHOTOS: Behind the Cover: Are You Mom Enough?)

    How old are your children?
    My adopted son is 5, and my biological son will be 4 next month.

    Tell me about becoming a mom and breast-feeding your children.
    We were starting the process of adoption when I got pregnant. We weren’t expecting our biological son at all. He was born two months early, and preemies that age don’t have a sucking reflex. The nurses in the NICU [neonatal intensive care unit] — they kept trying to put him on formula. I couldn’t see him for three days because I was so sick. I was basically passed out from the medication they were giving me. My husband is so great — he would bring the equipment in and actually do the pumping while I was asleep. It was a full family effort. My mother breast-fed me until I was 6 years old, until I self-weaned. Her encouragement to breast-feed is why we were so successful.

    And your adopted son?
    We were able to bring our son home in November 2010. I know so many amazing women who have induced their lactation, but I had milk [from feeding my biological son]. I had one of the easier situations as far as adoptive breast-feeding is concerned, but it was considered extended breast-feeding. And it was transracial. And he was adopted. I was ready for attack as soon as I posted one of the pictures [on my blog].

    Being able to give him that [comfort] with the trauma that he faced was really, really important to me. But I didn’t realize how much it would help my attachment to him. When his English improved, because the connection was there, he didn’t do it as much. So now he’ll do it maybe once a month.

    Why did your mom breast-feed you for so long?
    She wasn’t a hippie. Everyone thinks she must have been because we lived in Northern California. My dad did go to Berkeley, but he was a nutritional scientist. He got his master’s there and his Ph.D. My parents were really into nutrition, that’s why.

    Do you remember breast-feeding?
    Yes.

    What’s that memory like?
    It’s really warm. It’s like embracing your mother, like a hug. You feel comforted, nurtured and really, really loved. I had so much self-confidence as a child, and I know it’s from that. I never felt like she would ever leave me. I felt that security.

    Extended breast-feeding is one of those attachment-parenting things that can be really challenging for moms who work. Are you a stay-at-home mom?
    I stay at home. I blog from home. And I homeschool. I think if [attachment parenting] is working for a family, that’s what should matter. If it’s too hard on the parents, it’s in vain if there’s an emptiness about how they’re living their life.

    What do you say to people who say breast-feeding a 3-year-old is disturbing or wrong?
    They are people who tell me they’re going to call social services on me or that it’s child molestation. I really don’t think I can reason with those people. But as far as someone who says they’re uncomfortable with this, I don’t think it’s wrong to admit this. But people have to realize this is biologically normal. It’s not socially normal. The more people see it, the more it’ll become normal in our culture. That’s what I’m hoping. I want people to see it.

    There seems to be a war going on between conventional parenting and attachment parenting, and that’s what I want to avoid. I want everyone to be encouraging. We’re not on opposing teams. We all need to be encouraging to each other, and I don’t think we’re doing a very good job at that.


    Here is another photo for the shoot https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...&type=1&ref=nf

  10. #139
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,363
    Thanks
    467
    Thanked
    357
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    In the way this image was intended by the photographer, it led me to associate with David Walliams character on little Britain ... 'bitty?'

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to squirrelex For This Useful Post:

    Guest654  (12-05-2012),SeymourTheBear  (12-05-2012)

  12. #140
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    19,776
    Thanks
    5,212
    Thanked
    7,063
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 postsEmerald Star - 10,000 postsRuby Star - 15,000 posts
    I don't understand why this woman is being vilified. She breastfed on the cover of a magazine whilst wearing make up? I see more boobs on the cover of zoo.

    This whole thing has done me a massive favour. I deleted a few friends from facebook and from my life and I feel much better today. If people think mothers like me are
    - freaks
    - weird
    - creepy
    - can't let go

    Then they can p!ss off. They probably wouldn't want me in their life anyway

    I asked DP what he thought of the photo and he shrugged and said he felt indifferent *phew*

  13. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Benji For This Useful Post:

    BabushkaMumma  (12-05-2012),Etienne  (12-05-2012),Hootenanny  (12-05-2012),Littlemissmetal  (12-05-2012),SpecialPatrolGroup  (12-05-2012)


 

Similar Threads

  1. Breastfeeding cover and pillow?
    By Piffle in forum Breastfeeding Support
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 20-05-2012, 08:45
  2. "Provactive" breastfeeding image on TIME cover stirs up storm
    By Lilahh in forum Pregnancy & Parenting In The News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-05-2012, 10:39
  3. Breastfeeding number 2: how different to first time around?
    By Smooshy in forum Breastfeeding Support
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 24-03-2012, 20:46

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
free weekly newsletters | sign up now!
who are these people who write great posts? meet our hubbub authors!
Learn how you can contribute to the hubbub!

reviews
learn how you can become a reviewer!

competitions

forum - chatting now
christmas gift guidesee all Red Stocking
Riverton Leisureplex
An Extreme Family Pass at Riverton Leisureplex is the ultimate way to cool off during the summer school holidays. The $30 Pass allows pool and waterslide access for 2 adults and 2 children, as well as a drink, popcorn and an icy pole for each person.
sales & new stuffsee all
True Fairies
True Fairies is the first interactive website where children can engage and speak with a real fairy through the unique webcam fairy portal. Each session is tailored to the child, and is filled with enchantment and magic.
Visit website to find out more!
featured supporter
Sarah Tooke Childbirth & Parenting Education
Providing private, personalised antenatal childbirth & parenting education to expectant parents in the comfort of their own home. Sessions are flexible, including everything that hospital based programs cover. Click to find out more!
gotcha
X

Pregnant for the first-time?

Not sure where to start? We can help!

Our Insider Programs for pregnancy first-timers will lead you step-by-step through the 14 Pregnancy Must Dos!