I really don't care how many kids someone has. Again, my main concern is the running out of resources.
Maybe this is a bit off topic, but another thing that saddens me is the high risk to a lot of flora and fauna ending up extinct because we humans (superior beings) keep multiplying forever and need more houses built to live in or more meat to eat.
As we believe we are superior over orangutangs, whales, tigers, lions, rhino's etc, we will just kill them to make way for us and our luxuries (ie ivory statues on the mantelpiece, bigger houses and properties, fancy mahogany and teak furniture, etc).
So its not just about human rights, what about the rights of our flora and fauna?
"It's kind of sad that partnered SAHP's seem to be free of people's judgments even if they are receiving payments. I always see the irony here of some that are so judgmental, particularly of single parents getting payments, yet they receive payments themselves to support them being at home."
I totally know what you are saying, but i don't think all partnered people are free of judgement. I know two couples who claim that they are not together so that the woman can get a full pension, and neither of the mums have had to work for years because of it. Both their parters earn a really good income, so they have plenty of money for holidays and new cars. We also know a couple who both have never worked and have 6 kids, but only the 2 older ones are with them because they are drug addicts and get every baby taken from them. I think single parents def cop a lot of flack at times if they are receiving payments, but plenty of couples abuse the system too.
Last edited by Clementine Grace; 15-04-2012 at 15:38.
I've seen parents who are both unemployed, who currently already have a child choose to have another child because they know they can fall back on welfare to help out. In my view my partner and I both work our butts off and see our taxes going towards the welfare payments of people who cant be bothered finding a job.
I'm more sympathetic towards families where there is at least one parent working, but then still baffles me why some still choose to add to their families when cash flow is tight. Maybe if there were some limits on welfare payments through capping of the payment at a certain number of children then these families can still choose to have more kids if they wish but just realise that the Government (and tax payers) will not be assisting with any further payments.
Realistically.....if you are relying on welfare payments should you really be be choosing to have 3+ kids?
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using BubHub
i'm not against it, but, if it was in place 26yrs ago in Australia i wouldn't be here
I think there needs to be restrictions on the amount of kids parents who repeatedly have their kids taken off them by DoCS can have.
My mother recieved very little monetary support from the government when she had her first 5 children,
Her last 3 there was money support available for,
We three weren't tried for we just weren't NOT tried for, mum didn't use birth control.
I've yet to meet a person who has kids for the money, most normal people realise the small amount the govt pays you gets you by and nothing else
Sent from my MB526 using BubHub
share a book (19-04-2012)
Whoops double post.
Last edited by Night Owl; 19-04-2012 at 18:44. Reason: double post
Pregnant for the first-time?
Not sure where to start? We can help!
Our Insider Programs for pregnancy first-timers will lead you step-by-step through the 14 Pregnancy Must Dos!